Perfluorinated Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Durability

Durability is a critical issue in all fuel cell systems, certainly so for PEM membrane polymers. Perfluorinated ionomers are generally favored in PEM systems at the present time; the useful lifetimes of such systems can be limited by damage including membrane thinning, weight loss, and redistribution of catalyst materials during fuel cell operation. Hydrogen peroxide remains the most likely culprit for membrane degradation, being readily produced as a by‐product under fuel cell catalysis conditions. Once generated, hydrogen peroxide can be readily homolysed into peroxide radicals capable of breaking of polymer constituent bonds. The leading mechanism for degradation of commercially‐available PEM membranes is initiated by abstraction of a hydrogen atom from residual carboxylic acid ends on PTFE backbones. Such atom abstraction initiates a systematic chain oxidation to carbon dioxide and hydrogen fluoride, which is detected in the effluent water. Reduction of the carboxylic acid ends by fluorination substantially reduces degradation and increases durability. Under these conditions, polymer degradation appears to proceed by peroxide attack at less active positions as well, perhaps 2–3 orders of magnitude slower to react than at carboxylic acid groups; this lower reactivity can be balanced by the considerably higher concentration of non‐carboxylate positions on the polymer. In the years to come, critical questions to be answered include determination of actual peroxide radical concentrations within operating fuel cells under steady state, start up/shut down and upset conditions, a better understanding of specific sites of attack beyond carboxylic acid end groups, and the methods for reducing the extent and the impact of polymer degradation in order to prolong PEM fuel cell lives.

[1]  Shulamith Schlick,et al.  Membrane-derived fluorinated radicals detected by electron spin resonance in UV-irradiated Nafion and Dow ionomers: effect of counterions and H2O2. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  R. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of Deep Temperature Cycling on Nafion® 112 Membranes and Membrane Electrode Assemblies , 2004 .

[3]  D. Curtin,et al.  Advanced materials for improved PEMFC performance and life , 2004 .

[4]  Hubert A. Gasteiger,et al.  The oxygen reduction reaction on a Pt/carbon fuel cell catalyst in the presence of chloride anions , 2001 .

[5]  A. Laconti,et al.  Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Degradation Mechanisms in Fuel Cells - Findings Over the Past 30 Years and Comparison with Electrolyzers , 2006 .

[6]  E. Endoh,et al.  Development of Highly Durable MEA for PEMFC under High Temperature Operations (2) , 2006 .

[7]  A. Panchenko,et al.  Comparative DFT study of non-fluorinated and perfluorinated alkyl and alkyl-peroxy radicals , 2005 .

[8]  Rodney L. Borup,et al.  Durability of PEFCs at High Humidity Conditions , 2005 .

[9]  Bernd Bauer,et al.  Polymeric proton conducting membranes for medium temperature fuel cells (110–160°C) , 2001 .

[10]  Y. Kawano,et al.  TGA and Time-Dependent FTIR Study of Dehydrating Nafion−Na Membrane , 2003 .

[11]  F. C. Wilson,et al.  The morphology in nafion† perfluorinated membrane products, as determined by wide- and small-angle x-ray studies , 1981 .

[12]  H.-G. Haubold,et al.  Nano structure of NAFION: a SAXS study , 2001 .

[13]  S. Radice,et al.  End groups in fluoropolymers , 1999 .

[14]  Robert B. Moore,et al.  State of understanding of nafion. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[15]  O. Antoine,et al.  RRDE study of oxygen reduction on Pt nanoparticles inside Nafion®: H2O2 production in PEMFC cathode conditions , 2000 .

[16]  Mathias Schulze,et al.  Dry layer preparation and characterisation of polymer electrolyte fuel cell components , 2000 .

[17]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  Determination of water diffusion coefficients in perfluorosulfonate ionomeric membranes , 1991 .

[18]  C. Walling Fenton's reagent revisited , 1975 .

[19]  Thomas J. Schmidt,et al.  Performance and Durability of Membrane Electrode Assemblies Based on Radiation‐Grafted FEP‐g‐Polystyrene Membranes , 2004 .

[20]  Robert M. Darling,et al.  Kinetic Model of Platinum Dissolution in PEMFCs , 2003 .

[21]  T. Zawodzinski,et al.  Multiblock sulfonated–fluorinated poly(arylene ether)s for a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2006 .

[22]  S. Cleghorn,et al.  Effect of Relative Humidity on Membrane Durability in PEM Fuel Cells , 2006 .

[23]  B. B. Sauer,et al.  High-Resolution Imaging of Ionic Domains and Crystal Morphology in Ionomers Using AFM Techniques , 2000 .

[24]  M. Hein,et al.  In-situ spin trap electron paramagnetic resonance study of fuel cell processes , 2004 .

[25]  Ernest Yeager,et al.  KINETIC STUDIES OF THE OXYGEN-PEROXIDE COUPLE ON PYROLYTIC GRAPHITE , 1970 .

[26]  Wen Liu,et al.  In Situ Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide in PEM Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[27]  Gérard Gebel,et al.  Evidence of elongated polymeric aggregates in Nafion , 2002 .

[28]  Felix Bauer,et al.  Influence of Temperature and Humidity on the Mechanical Properties of Nafion® 117 Polymer Electrolyte Membrane , 2005 .

[29]  U. Scheler,et al.  Number-average molecular weight of radiation-degraded poly(tetrafluoroethylene). An end group analysis based on solid-state NMR and IR spectroscopy , 2002 .

[30]  M. Hickner,et al.  Alternative polymer systems for proton exchange membranes (PEMs). , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[31]  Fuqiang Liu,et al.  Degradation mechanism of polystyrene sulfonic acid membrane and application of its composite membranes in fuel cells , 2003 .

[32]  S. A. Gürsel,et al.  Radiation Grafted Membranes for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 2005 .