Use of Web 2.0 and Mobile Technologies for Developing Argumentative Skills

Web 2.0 and mobile technologies have the potential to support learning outside formal learning spaces. In this paper, we examine the extent to which the use of Web 2.0 and mobile technologies has an impact on the argumentative skills of Grade 11 students in a Singapore high school. Using a quasi-experimental and mixed method research design, we looked at the quality of students’ writing at the end of a six-week intervention that involved students using Schoology to read assigned materials, share new materials, post arguments, and respond to their classmates’ arguments. We also examined both student and teacher interview transcripts to gain an understanding of how students and teachers viewed Schoology as an e-learning tool. Students in the experimental group showed higher levels of argumentation skills compared to students in the control group. Findings from student and teacher interviews concerning the use of Web 2.0 and mobile technologies to help them develop argumentative skills were mixed. The analysis of the interviews revealed that some students felt that it was distracting because they tended to veer into social media sites and preferred to use them in the classroom, while others felt that Schoology provided a great platform for them to develop argumentative skills as peer feedback gave them multiple perspectives. It developed a community of learners, and provided an interesting and interactive experience. The participation rate was higher on the online platform compared to classroom discussion. The teacher reported that students’ essays became more coherent and their content more relevant.

[1]  Saovapa Wichadee,et al.  Using Wikis To Develop Summary Writing Abilities Of Students In An EFL Class , 2011 .

[2]  Antonia Chandrasegaran,et al.  Stance-taking and stance-support in students’ online forum discussion , 2006 .

[3]  Shiang-Kwei Wang,et al.  The Impact of Using Blogs on College Students' Reading Comprehension and Learning Motivation , 2010 .

[4]  Thomas Donald Cochrane,et al.  Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0 , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines , 2010 .

[6]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[8]  Jue-Kyoung Pae,et al.  Wiki-Based English Writing : Its Effect on English Writing Proficiency and Anxiety and Korean Learners' Perceptions , 2007 .

[9]  K. Hew,et al.  Use of Web 2.0 Technologies in K-12 and Higher Education: The Search for Evidence-Based Practice. , 2013 .

[10]  S. Erduran,et al.  TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .

[11]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Collaborative learning at low cost: CoWeb use in English composition , 2002, CSCL.

[12]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument , 2001 .

[13]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels , 1996 .

[14]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[15]  Recep S. Arslan,et al.  How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? , 2010 .

[16]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  The Impact of Blogging and Scaffolding on Primary School Pupils' Narrative Writing: A Case Study , 2010, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[17]  D. Kuhn THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[18]  David Lester Neumann,et al.  The Effects of Using a Wiki on Student Engagement and Learning of Report Writing Skills in a University Statistics Course. , 2009 .