Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored anti-EGFR therapy selection in patients with colorectal cancer in daily clinical practice

For a nationwide real-word data study on the application of predictive mutation testing of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy stratification, pathology data were collected from the Dutch Pathology Registry from October 2017 until June 2019 (N=4060) and linked with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Mutation testing rates increased from 24% at diagnosis of stage IV disease to 60% after 20–23 months of follow-up (p<0.001). Application of anti-EGFR therapy in KRAS/NRAS wild-type patients was mainly observed from the third treatment line onwards (65% vs 17% in first/second treatment line (p<0.001)). The national average KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation rate was 63.9%, being similar for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approaches and single gene tests (64.4% vs 61.2%, p=ns). NGS-based approaches detected more additional potential biomarkers, for example, ERBB2 amplifications (p<0.05). Therefore, single gene tests are suitable to stratify patients with mCRC for anti-EGFR therapy, but NGS is superior enabling upfront identification of therapy resistance or facilitate enrolment into clinical trials.

[1]  J. Desai,et al.  Encorafenib Plus Cetuximab as a New Standard of Care for Previously Treated BRAF V600E–Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated Survival Results and Subgroup Analyses from the BEACON Study , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  J. Desai,et al.  CodeBreak 100: Activity of AMG 510, a novel small molecule inhibitor of KRASG12C, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. , 2020 .

[3]  A. Norden,et al.  Genomic Profiling for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, Microsatellite Instability, and Mismatch Repair Deficiency Among Patients With Metastatic Colon Cancer , 2019, JCO precision oncology.

[4]  J. Desai,et al.  Binimetinib, Encorafenib, and Cetuximab Triplet Therapy for Patients With BRAF V600E–Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Safety Lead-In Results From the Phase III BEACON Colorectal Cancer Study , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Chi Lin,et al.  KRAS Testing, Tumor Location, and Survival in Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: SEER 2010-2013. , 2017, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[6]  J Ricke,et al.  ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  P. Juneau,et al.  KRAS testing of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in a community-based oncology setting: a retrospective database analysis , 2015, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[8]  Y. Yatabe,et al.  Japanese Society of Medical Oncology Clinical Guidelines: RAS (KRAS/NRAS) mutation testing in colorectal cancer patients11 , 2015, Cancer science.

[9]  Jennifer S. Lin,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Gwen L. Alexander,et al.  KRAS Testing and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Treatment for Colorectal Cancer in Community Settings , 2012, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[11]  N. Normanno,et al.  Uptake of KRAS mutation testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Europe, Latin America and Asia , 2011, Targeted Oncology.

[12]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  Linda Mol,et al.  Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  M. Choti,et al.  NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: colon cancer. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[16]  J. Meyerhardt,et al.  Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  F. Siannis,et al.  Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  KRAS status and efficacy of first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience , 2008 .

[19]  M. Casparie,et al.  Pathology Databanking and Biobanking in The Netherlands, a Central Role for PALGA, the Nationwide Histopathology and Cytopathology Data Network and Archive , 2007, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.

[20]  David J Spiegelhalter,et al.  Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  E. Kuipers,et al.  Colorectal cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[22]  Medical Advisory Secretariat KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis. , 2010, Ontario health technology assessment series.