Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea

The cochlea is normally driven with "forward" stimulation, in which sound is introduced to the ear canal. Alternatively, the cochlea can be stimulated at the round window (RW) using an actuator. During RW "reverse" stimulation, the acoustic flow starting at the RW does not necessarily take the same path as during forward stimulation. To understand the differences between forward and reverse stimulation, we measured ear-canal pressure, stapes velocity, RW velocity, and intracochlear pressures in scala vestibuli (SV) and scala tympani (ST) of fresh human temporal bones. During forward stimulation, the cochlear drive (differential pressure across the partition) results from the large difference in magnitude between the pressures of SV and ST, which occurs due to the high compliance of the RW. During reverse stimulation, the relatively high impedance of the middle ear causes the pressures of SV and ST to have similar magnitudes, and the differential pressure results primarily from the difference in phase of the pressures. Furthermore, the sound path differs between forward and reverse stimulation, such that motion through a third window is more significant during reverse stimulation. Additionally, we determined that although stapes velocity is a good estimate of cochlear drive during forward stimulation, it is not a good measure during reverse stimulation. This article is part of a special issue entitled "MEMRO 2012".

[1]  V. Colletti,et al.  Treatment of the Atretic Ear With Round Window Vibrant Soundbridge Implantation in Infants and Children: Electrocochleography and Audiologic Outcomes , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  Ernst Dalhoff,et al.  Controlled round-window stimulation in human temporal bones yielding reproducible and functionally relevant stapedial responses , 2011, Hearing Research.

[3]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Input impedance of the cochlea in cat. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  V. Nedzelnitsky,et al.  Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation , 2010, Hearing Research.

[7]  Daniel J. Tollin,et al.  Round Window Membrane Implantation with an Active Middle Ear Implant: A Study of the Effects on the Performance of Round Window Exposure and Transducer Tip Diameter in Human Cadaveric Temporal Bones , 2010, Audiology and Neurotology.

[8]  Hans-Peter Zenner,et al.  Conditions for Highly Efficient and Reproducible Round-Window Stimulation in Humans , 2011, Audiology and Neurotology.

[9]  A. B. Grayeli,et al.  Functional Results of Vibrant Soundbridge Middle Ear Implants in Conductive and Mixed Hearing Losses , 2011, Audiology and Neurotology.

[10]  Martin Kompis,et al.  Factors Improving the Vibration Transfer of the Floating Mass Transducer at the Round Window , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  Sigfrid D. Soli,et al.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[12]  G Zweig,et al.  An empirical bound on the compressibility of the cochlea. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge RW-Coupler for round window Vibroplasty with tympanosclerosis , 2012, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  E. Olson,et al.  Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  M. Carner,et al.  The Floating Mass Transducer for External Auditory Canal and Middle Ear Malformations , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  T Lenarz,et al.  The vibrant soundbridge for conductive and mixed hearing losses: European multicenter study results. , 2010, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[17]  Rudolf Häusler,et al.  The floating mass transducer at the round window: Direct transmission or bone conduction? , 2010, Hearing Research.

[18]  E. Wever,et al.  LII The Functions of the round Window , 1948, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[19]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance , 2001, Hearing Research.

[20]  A. Dancer,et al.  Intracochlear sound pressure measurements in guinea pigs , 1980, Hearing Research.

[21]  M. Kringlebotn,et al.  The equality of volume displacements in the inner ear windows. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  E. Truy,et al.  European Results With Totally Implantable Carina Placed on the Round Window: 2-Year Follow-Up , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[23]  R A Ruth,et al.  The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach. , 1995, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[24]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Differential Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Normal Human Temporal Bones , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[25]  M. Lawrence,et al.  The Acoustic Pathways to the Cochlea , 1950 .

[26]  Manohar Bance,et al.  Analysis of Vibrant Soundbridge Placement Against the Round Window Membrane in a Human Cadaveric Temporal Bone Model , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[27]  A. Snik,et al.  Application of Active Middle Ear Implants in Patients With Severe Mixed Hearing Loss , 2012, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[28]  Saumil N Merchant,et al.  Evaluation of Round Window Stimulation Using the Floating Mass Transducer by Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Human Temporal Bones , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[29]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Jae Hoon Sim,et al.  Objective Assessment of Stapedotomy Surgery From Round Window Motion Measurement , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[32]  Roberta Marino,et al.  Impact of Floating Mass Transducer Coupling and Positioning in Round Window Vibroplasty , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.