Analysis of Activator and Repressor Functions Reveals the Requirements for Transcriptional Control by LuxR, the Master Regulator of Quorum Sensing in Vibrio harveyi

ABSTRACT LuxR-type transcription factors are the master regulators of quorum sensing in vibrios. LuxR proteins are unique members of the TetR superfamily of transcription factors because they activate and repress large regulons of genes. Here, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation and nucleotide sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify LuxR binding sites in the Vibrio harveyi genome. Bioinformatics analyses showed that the LuxR consensus binding site at repressed promoters is a symmetric palindrome, whereas at activated promoters it is asymmetric and contains only half of the palindrome. Using a genetic screen, we isolated LuxR mutants that separated activation and repression functions at representative promoters. These LuxR mutants exhibit sequence-specific DNA binding defects that restrict activation or repression activity to subsets of target promoters. Altering the LuxR DNA binding site sequence to one more closely resembling the ideal LuxR consensus motif can restore in vivo function to a LuxR mutant. This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how a single protein can recognize a variety of binding sites to differentially regulate gene expression. IMPORTANCE Bacteria use the cell-cell communication process called quorum sensing to regulate collective behaviors. In vibrios, LuxR-type transcription factors control the quorum-sensing gene expression cascade. LuxR-type proteins are structural homologs of TetR-type transcription factors. LuxR proteins were assumed to function analogously to TetR proteins, which typically bind to a single conserved binding site to repress transcription of one or two genes. We find here that unlike TetR proteins, LuxR acts a global regulator, directly binding upstream of and controlling more than 100 genes. Again unlike TetR, LuxR functions as both an activator and a repressor, and these two activities can be separated by mutagenesis. Finally, the consensus binding motifs driving LuxR-activated and -repressed genes are distinct. This work shows that LuxR, although structurally similar to TetR, has evolved unique features enabling it to differentially control a large regulon of genes in response to quorum-sensing cues. Bacteria use the cell-cell communication process called quorum sensing to regulate collective behaviors. In vibrios, LuxR-type transcription factors control the quorum-sensing gene expression cascade. LuxR-type proteins are structural homologs of TetR-type transcription factors. LuxR proteins were assumed to function analogously to TetR proteins, which typically bind to a single conserved binding site to repress transcription of one or two genes. We find here that unlike TetR proteins, LuxR acts a global regulator, directly binding upstream of and controlling more than 100 genes. Again unlike TetR, LuxR functions as both an activator and a repressor, and these two activities can be separated by mutagenesis. Finally, the consensus binding motifs driving LuxR-activated and -repressed genes are distinct. This work shows that LuxR, although structurally similar to TetR, has evolved unique features enabling it to differentially control a large regulon of genes in response to quorum-sensing cues.

[1]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0 , 2007, Bioinform..

[2]  B. Bassler,et al.  Individual and Combined Roles of the Master Regulators AphA and LuxR in Control of the Vibrio harveyi Quorum-Sensing Regulon , 2012, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  R. Knight,et al.  Accurate taxonomy assignments from 16S rRNA sequences produced by highly parallel pyrosequencers , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  R. Ebright,et al.  Molecular basis of DNA sequence recognition by the catabolite gene activator protein: detailed inferences from three mutations that alter DNA sequence specificity. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Jolyon Holdstock,et al.  Studies of the distribution of Escherichia coli cAMP-receptor protein and RNA polymerase along the E. coli chromosome. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  T. Oh,et al.  Crystal Structure of SmcR, a Quorum-sensing Master Regulator of Vibrio vulnificus, Provides Insight into Its Regulation of Transcription* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  F. Kull,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Vibrio cholerae Quorum-Sensing Regulatory Protein HapR , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum-sensing non-coding small RNAs use unique pairing regions to differentially control mRNA targets , 2012, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  Rahul V. Kulkarni,et al.  Regulatory targets of quorum sensing in Vibrio cholerae: evidence for two distinct HapR-binding motifs , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Ruifu Yang,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation of opaR, qrr2–4 and aphA by the Master Quorum-Sensing Regulator OpaR in Vibrio parahaemolyticus , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Genomic Studies with Escherichia coli MelR Protein: Applications of , 2004 .

[12]  N. Fujita,et al.  Novel Roles of cAMP Receptor Protein (CRP) in Regulation of Transport and Metabolism of Carbon Sources , 2011, PloS one.

[13]  B. Bassler,et al.  AphA and LuxR/HapR reciprocally control quorum sensing in vibrios. , 2011, Genes & development.

[14]  H. Aiba Transcription of the Escherichia coli adenylate cyclase gene is negatively regulated by cAMP-cAMP receptor protein. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  H. Buc,et al.  Comparison of the binding sites for the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein at the lactose and galactose promoters. , 1983, The EMBO journal.

[16]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Structural basis for cooperative DNA binding by two dimers of the multidrug‐binding protein QacR , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[17]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. II. The binding specificity of cyclic AMP receptor protein to recognition sites. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  F. M. De La Vega,et al.  The Transcriptomes of Two Heritable Cell Types Illuminate the Circuit Governing Their Differentiation , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[19]  Bonnie L Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[20]  B. Tuch,et al.  Interlocking Transcriptional Feedback Loops Control White-Opaque Switching in Candida albicans , 2007, PLoS biology.

[21]  W. Reznikoff,et al.  Downstream deletion analysis of the lac promoter , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  Patrice Gouet,et al.  ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript , 1999, Bioinform..

[23]  R. Ebright,et al.  Transcription activation by catabolite activator protein (CAP). , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  Mikael Bodén,et al.  MEME Suite: tools for motif discovery and searching , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  W. Reznikoff,et al.  Escherichia coli catabolite gene activator protein mutants defective in positive control of lac operon transcription , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  Kyung Mo Kim,et al.  A Consensus Sequence for Binding of SmcR, a Vibrio vulnificus LuxR Homologue, and Genome-wide Identification of the SmcR Regulon* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Chrystala Constantinidou,et al.  Identification of the CRP regulon using in vitro and in vivo transcriptional profiling. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  A. F. Graham,et al.  Proximal and distal sites bind LuxR independently and activate expression of the Vibrio harveyi lux operon , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Mutants of the catabolite activator protein of Escherichia coli that are specifically deficient in the gene-activation function. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  D. W. Knowles,et al.  Transcription Factors Bind Thousands of Active and Inactive Regions in the Drosophila Blastoderm , 2008, PLoS biology.

[31]  B. Lang,et al.  MetR and CRP bind to the Vibrio harveyi lux promoters and regulate luminescence , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[32]  W. Hillen,et al.  Contacts between Tet repressor and tet operator revealed by new recognition specificities of single amino acid replacement mutants. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Michael Gribskov,et al.  Combining evidence using p-values: application to sequence homology searches , 1998, Bioinform..

[34]  Terry Speed,et al.  Genomic profiling and expression studies reveal both positive and negative activities for the Drosophila Myb MuvB/dREAM complex in proliferating cells. , 2007, Genes & development.

[35]  Bonnie L Bassler,et al.  Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[36]  Pascale Cossart,et al.  Mutations that alter the DNA sequence specificity of the catabolite gene activator protein of E. coli , 1984, Nature.

[37]  Seung Min Kim,et al.  Direct Interaction between Quorum-sensing Regulator SmcR and RNA Polymerase Is Mediated by Integration Host Factor to Activate vvpE Encoding Elastase in Vibrio vulnificus* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  Julio Collado-Vides,et al.  RegulonDB (version 6.0): gene regulation model of Escherichia coli K-12 beyond transcription, active (experimental) annotated promoters and Textpresso navigation , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  Christopher M Waters,et al.  The Vibrio harveyi quorum-sensing system uses shared regulatory components to discriminate between multiple autoinducers. , 2006, Genes & development.

[40]  Raquel Tobes,et al.  The TetR Family of Transcriptional Repressors , 2005, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[41]  R. Lauro,et al.  Dual control for transcription of the galactose operon by cyclic AMP and its receptor protein at two interspersed promoters , 1977, Cell.

[42]  H. Buc,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by cAMP and its receptor protein. , 1993, Annual review of biochemistry.

[43]  M. Berger,et al.  The Vibrio harveyi master quorum-sensing regulator, LuxR, a TetR-type protein is both an activator and a repressor: DNA recognition and binding specificity at target promoters , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[44]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. Statistical-mechanical theory and application to operators and promoters. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  Charles Elkan,et al.  Fitting a Mixture Model By Expectation Maximization To Discover Motifs In Biopolymer , 1994, ISMB.

[46]  B. Bassler,et al.  A negative feedback loop involving small RNAs accelerates Vibrio cholerae's transition out of quorum-sensing mode. , 2008, Genes & development.

[47]  H. Aiba,et al.  Autoregulation of the Escherichia coli crp gene: CRP is a transcriptional repressor for its own gene , 1983, Cell.