A filtering approach based on Gaussian–powerlaw convolutions for local PET verification of proton radiotherapy

Because proton beams activate positron emitters in patients, positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to play a unique role in the in vivo verification of proton radiotherapy. Unfortunately, the PET image is not directly proportional to the delivered radiation dose distribution. Current treatment verification strategies using PET therefore compare the actual PET image with full-blown Monte Carlo simulations of the PET signal. In this paper, we describe a simpler and more direct way to reconstruct the expected PET signal from the local radiation dose distribution near the distal fall-off region, which is calculated by the treatment planning programme. Under reasonable assumptions, the PET image can be described as a convolution of the dose distribution with a filter function. We develop a formalism to derive the filter function analytically. The main concept is the introduction of 'Q' functions defined as the convolution of a Gaussian with a powerlaw function. Special Q functions are the Gaussian itself and the error function. The convolution of two Q functions is another Q function. By fitting elementary dose distributions and their corresponding PET signals with Q functions, we derive the Q function approximation of the filter. The new filtering method has been validated through comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations and, in one case, with measured data. While the basic concept is developed under idealized conditions assuming that the absorbing medium is homogeneous near the distal fall-off region, a generalization to inhomogeneous situations is also described. As a result, the method can determine the distal fall-off region of the PET signal, and consequently the range of the proton beam, with millimetre accuracy. Quantification of the produced activity is possible. In conclusion, the PET activity resulting from a proton beam treatment can be determined by locally filtering the dose distribution as obtained from the treatment planning system. The filter function can be calculated analytically using convolutions of Gaussians and powerlaw functions.

[1]  Proton therapy in combination with PET as monitor: a feasibility study , 1992 .

[2]  Koji Murakami,et al.  Distributions of beta+ decayed nuclei generated in the CH2 and H2O targets by the target nuclear fragment reaction using therapeutic MONO and SOBP proton beam. , 2005, Medical physics.

[3]  M. Gusakow,et al.  Spallation de l'oxygene par des protons de 20 A 150 MeV , 1962 .

[4]  U Oelfke,et al.  Proton dose monitoring with PET: quantitative studies in Lucite. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  R. Bracewell The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[6]  Katia Parodi,et al.  The modelling of positron emitter production and PET imaging during carbon ion therapy , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  T. Tomitani,et al.  Quantitative comparison of suitability of various beams for range monitoring with induced β+ activity in hadron therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  D W Litzenberg,et al.  On-line monitoring of radiotherapy beams: experimental results with proton beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[9]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Electron-Photon Transport in FLUKA: Status , 2001 .

[10]  J. Archambeau,et al.  Visualization and Transport of Positron Emission from Proton Activation in vivo , 1978, Science.

[11]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Charged hadron tumour therapy monitoring by means of PET , 2004 .

[12]  K. Parodi,et al.  Experimental study on the feasibility of in-beam PET for accurate monitoring of proton therapy , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  T Bortfeld,et al.  An analytical approximation of the Bragg curve for therapeutic proton beams. , 1997, Medical physics.

[14]  H Paganetti,et al.  Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility. , 2004, Medical physics.

[15]  K Parodi,et al.  Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Mitsuyuki Abe,et al.  Usefulness of positron-emission tomographic images after proton therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Katia Parodi,et al.  In-beam PET measurements of β+ radioactivity induced by proton beams , 2002 .

[18]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Dual-energy tissue cancellation in mammography with quasi-monochromatic x-rays. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Oliver Jäkel,et al.  Positron emission tomography for quality assurance of cancer therapy with light ion beams , 1999 .

[20]  H Paganetti,et al.  Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  S Derreumaux,et al.  Is it possible to verify directly a proton-treatment plan using positron emission tomography? , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  M Goitein,et al.  A pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.