Characterization of mec1Kinase-Deficient Mutants and of New Hypomorphic mec1Alleles Impairing Subsets of the DNA Damage Response Pathway

ABSTRACT DNA damage checkpoints lead to the inhibition of cell cycle progression following DNA damage. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1 checkpoint protein, a phosphatidylinositol kinase-related protein, is required for transient cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage or DNA replication defects. We show thatmec1 kinase-deficient (mec1kd) mutants are indistinguishable from mec1Δ cells, indicating that the Mec1 conserved kinase domain is required for all known Mec1 functions, including cell viability and proper DNA damage response. Mec1kd variants maintain the ability to physically interact with both Ddc2 and wild-type Mec1 and cause dominant checkpoint defects when overproduced in MEC1 cells, impairing the ability of cells to slow down S phase entry and progression after DNA damage in G1 or during S phase. Conversely, an excess of Mec1kd inMEC1 cells does not abrogate the G2/M checkpoint, suggesting that Mec1 functions required for response to aberrant DNA structures during specific cell cycle stages can be separable. In agreement with this hypothesis, we describe two new hypomorphic mec1 mutants that are completely defective in the G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints but properly delay nuclear division after UV irradiation in G2. The finding that these mutants, although indistinguishable frommec1Δ cells with respect to the ability to replicate a damaged DNA template, do not lose viability after UV light and methyl methanesulfonate treatment suggests that checkpoint impairments do not necessarily result in hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents.

[1]  T. Petes,et al.  Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Jackson,et al.  LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signalling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[3]  P. Plevani,et al.  Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1‐dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[4]  G. Lucchini,et al.  The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. , 2000, Genes & development.

[5]  G. Lucchini,et al.  Checkpoint proteins influence telomeric silencing and length maintenance in budding yeast. , 2000, Genetics.

[6]  Y. Shiloh,et al.  Functional link of BRCA1 and ataxia telangiectasia gene product in DNA damage response , 2000, Nature.

[7]  W. Heyer,et al.  DNA Repair Protein Rad55 Is a Terminal Substrate of the DNA Damage Checkpoints , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[8]  D. Livingston,et al.  ATM phosphorylation of Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is required in a DNA damage response , 2000, Nature.

[9]  Y. Shiloh,et al.  Functional link between ataxia-telangiectasia and Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene products , 2000, Nature.

[10]  M. Gatei,et al.  ATM-dependent phosphorylation of nibrin in response to radiation exposure , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Bo Xu,et al.  ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway , 2000, Nature.

[12]  J. Murguía,et al.  Sensing and responding to DNA damage. , 2000, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[13]  A. Shinohara,et al.  The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[14]  A. Chabes,et al.  Yeast Sml1, a Protein Inhibitor of Ribonucleotide Reductase* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  H. Wang,et al.  Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. , 1999, Science.

[16]  S. Elledge,et al.  Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks. , 1999, Science.

[17]  T. Halazonetis,et al.  Many faces of ATM: eighth international workshop on ataxia-telangiectasia. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  D. Thompson,et al.  Genetic control of recombination partner preference in yeast meiosis. Isolation and characterization of mutants elevated for meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination. , 1999, Genetics.

[19]  T. Weinert,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice. , 1999, Genetics.

[20]  K. Siegers,et al.  Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR‐based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines , 1999, Yeast.

[21]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Radiation-induced Assembly of Rad51 and Rad52 Recombination Complex Requires ATM and c-Abl* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  Č. Venclovas,et al.  A Sliding Clamp Model for the Rad1 Family of Cell Cycle Checkpoint Proteins , 1999, Cell.

[23]  Kunihiro Matsumoto,et al.  Role of a Complex Containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint Pathway , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[24]  J. Vialard,et al.  The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1‐dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[25]  S. Jackson,et al.  DNA end-joining: from yeast to man. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[26]  G. Lucchini,et al.  DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[27]  S. Elledge,et al.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. , 1998, Genes & development.

[28]  T. Weinert DNA Damage and Checkpoint Pathways Molecular Anatomy and Interactions with Repair , 1998, Cell.

[29]  R Rothstein,et al.  A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[30]  A. Emili,et al.  MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[31]  G. Lucchini,et al.  Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[32]  D. Stern,et al.  Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. , 1998, Science.

[33]  J. Haber,et al.  Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. , 1998, Genetics.

[34]  B. Stillman,et al.  The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[35]  G. Giordano,et al.  A novel Sec‐independent periplasmic protein translocation pathway in Escherichia coli , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[36]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Overexpression of a kinase‐inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA‐damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[37]  D. Koshland,et al.  The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  J. Haber,et al.  Two pathways for removal of nonhomologous DNA ends during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[39]  G. Lucchini,et al.  The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[40]  Y. Shiloh,et al.  Interaction between ATM protein and c-Abl in response to DNA damage , 1997, Nature.

[41]  Amanda G Paulovich,et al.  When Checkpoints Fail , 1997, Cell.

[42]  A. Carr Control of cell cycle arrest by the Mec1sc/Rad3sp DNA structure checkpoint pathway. , 1997, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[43]  T. Weinert Yeast checkpoint controls and relevance to cancer. , 1997, Cancer surveys.

[44]  P. Hieter,et al.  The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  A. Carr,et al.  The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[46]  José Alberola-lla,et al.  The use of dominant-negative mutations to elucidate signal transduction pathways in lymphocytes. , 1996, Current opinion in immunology.

[47]  D. Stern,et al.  Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. , 1996, Genes & development.

[48]  S. Elledge,et al.  Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-Like Kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in Yeast Cell Cycle Checkpoint Pathways , 1996, Science.

[49]  S. Schreiber,et al.  PIK-Related Kinases: DNA Repair, Recombination, and Cell Cycle Checkpoints , 1995, Science.

[50]  F. Collins,et al.  TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1 , 1995, Cell.

[51]  V. Zakian ATM-related genes: What do they tell us about functions of the human gene? , 1995, Cell.

[52]  L. Hartwell,et al.  A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in Response to DNA damage , 1995, Cell.

[53]  J. Sekelsky,et al.  The mei-41 gene of D. melanogaster is a structural and functional homolog of the human ataxia telangiectasia gene , 1995, Cell.

[54]  J. Gassenhuber,et al.  TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telomere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telangiectasia gene , 1995, Cell.

[55]  M. Lovett,et al.  A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. , 1995, Science.

[56]  P. Philippsen,et al.  New heterologous modules for classical or PCR‐based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Yeast.

[57]  T. Baker,et al.  Complete transposition requires four active monomers in the mu transposase tetramer. , 1994, Genes & development.

[58]  S. Elledge,et al.  The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. , 1994, Genes & development.

[59]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. , 1994, Genes & development.

[60]  E. Friedberg,et al.  RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  M. Meyn High spontaneous intrachromosomal recombination rates in ataxia-telangiectasia. , 1993, Science.

[62]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint. , 1993, Genetics.

[63]  R. Chanet,et al.  RADH, a gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding a putative DNA helicase involved in DNA repair. Characteristics of radH mutants and sequence of the gene. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[64]  R. D. Gietz,et al.  New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. , 1988, Gene.

[65]  L. Hartwell,et al.  The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1988, Science.

[66]  G. Fink,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics , 1979 .