A comparison of two methods of scaling on form perception via a haptic interface

In this fundamental study, we compare two scaling methods by focusing on the subjects' strategies which are using a sensory substitution device. Method 1 consists in a reduction of the sensor size and its displacement speed. Here, speed reduction is obtained by a "human" movement reduction (hand speed reduction). Method 2 consists in a classical increase of the image dimension. The experimental device couples the pen on a graphics tablet with tactile sensory stimulators. These latter are activated when the sensor crosses the figure on the computer screen. This virtual sensor (square matrix composed of 16 elementary fields) is displaced when the pen, guided by a human hand displacements, moves on the graphics tablet. Even if it seems that there is no difference between the two methods, the results show that the recognition rate is closely dependent on the figure size and the strategies used by the subjects are more suitable for method 2 than the method 1. In fact, half of the subjects found that method 1 inhibits their movements and the majority of them don't feel the scaling effect, whereas this is clearly felt in method 2.

[1]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Jazz: an extensible zoomable user interface graphics toolkit in Java , 2000, UIST '00.

[2]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  Context and interaction in zoomable user interfaces , 2000, AVI '00.

[3]  Michel Beaudouin-Lafon,et al.  Instrumental interaction: an interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces , 2000, CHI.

[4]  James D. Hollan,et al.  PadPrints: graphical multiscale Web histories , 1998, UIST '98.

[5]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Critical zones in desert fog: aids to multiscale navigation , 1998, UIST '98.

[6]  Kwang Bok Lee,et al.  The embedded zooming applications for personal digital assistants , 2003, IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings..

[7]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  DateLens: A fisheye calendar interface for PDAs , 2004, TCHI.

[8]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices , 2002, UIST '02.

[9]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[10]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces , 1995, CHI '95.

[11]  P. Bach-y-Rita Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution , 1972 .

[12]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Target acquisition in multiscale electronic worlds , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  PhotoMesa: a zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps , 2001, UIST '01.

[14]  Mikael Jern,et al.  Visual user interface for PDAs , 2003, Proceedings on Seventh International Conference on Information Visualization, 2003. IV 2003..

[15]  Charles Lenay,et al.  Acuité perceptive via une interface pseudo-haptique , 2004, IHM '04.

[16]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Anisotropies of touch in haptic icon exploration , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[17]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Universal access in HCI : inclusive design in the information society , 2003 .

[18]  C. Lenay,et al.  SENSORY SUBSTITUTION: LIMITS AND PERSPECTIVES , 2003 .