Autonomous Assistance-as-Needed Control of a Lower Limb Exoskeleton With Guaranteed Stability

The use of exoskeletons for clinical lower-limb stroke rehabilitation offers the potential of improved and customized rehabilitation that reduces the requirements and demands placed on multiple staff members. Initial research with lower-limb exoskeletons show potential to alleviate this problem. Conventional assistance-based exoskeleton devices simply enforce the desired gait trajectory for the patient in order to ensure safety and stability. Unfortunately, if the end-user does not have to work to contribute to successful motion, rehabilitation often does not occur. Recent evidence has suggested that assistance-as-needed control prevents users from slacking, facilitating functional motor recovery. Assistance-as-needed control turns off assistive torques during periods when the patient is able to execute a desired gait pattern but if the patients gait deviates sufficiently from a desired trajectory then assistive torques are generated to compensate for the patients loss of strength. This strategy encourages the patient to contribute effort while still enabling the exoskeleton to guide movements. Assistance-as-needed control inherently leads to aperiodic gait patterns and has accordingly been difficult to employ in lower-limb exoskeletons due to the need to ensure stability. This work demonstrates how virtual constraint control—a method with robust stability properties used in prostheses and assistive exoskeletons control—can be combined with a velocity-modulated deadzone to ensure stability. Simulations suggest that the method can accommodate a large deadzone while remaining stable across a range of unanticipated gait pathologies, as demonstrated using Lorenz mappings that can accommodate the aperiodic nature of the resulting gait.

[1]  H. Hemami,et al.  The inverted pendulum and biped stability , 1977 .

[2]  R. Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  H J Grootenboer,et al.  An inverse dynamics model for the analysis, reconstruction and prediction of bipedal walking. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Yeng Chai Soh,et al.  Planning and control of a biped robot , 1999 .

[5]  Mukul Talaty,et al.  Differentiating ability in users of the ReWalkTM powered exoskeleton: An analysis of walking kinematics , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[6]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  An alternative approach to synthesizing bipedal walking , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Andy Ruina,et al.  Energetic Consequences of Walking Like an Inverted Pendulum: Step-to-Step Transitions , 2005, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[8]  Y. Hurmuzlu,et al.  On the measurement of dynamic stability of human locomotion. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  The development and testing of a human machine interface for a mobile medical exoskeleton , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  An Assistive Control Approach for a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton to Facilitate Recovery of Walking Following Stroke , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Spyros G. Tzafestas,et al.  Robust sliding-mode control applied to a 5-link biped robot , 1996, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[12]  S.K. Agrawal,et al.  Active Leg Exoskeleton (ALEX) for Gait Rehabilitation of Motor-Impaired Patients , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[13]  Guangming Xie,et al.  Modeling and gait selection of passivity-based seven-link bipeds with dynamic series of walking phases , 2012, Robotica.

[14]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective. , 2007, Human movement science.

[15]  M. Burns,et al.  Application of Neuroscience to Technology in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2008, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[16]  Xiuping Mu Dynamics and motion regulation of a five-link biped robot walking in the sagittal plane , 2005 .

[17]  S. Kajita,et al.  Study of dynamic biped locomotion on rugged terrain-theory and basic experiment , 1991, Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics 'Robots in Unstructured Environments.

[18]  K. Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  Optimal biped walking with a complete dynamical model , 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).

[19]  Q. Wu,et al.  Design of energy efficient joint profiles for a planar five-link biped robot , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01EX515).

[20]  M. Coleman,et al.  The simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Michael J Rainbow,et al.  Performance of an inverted pendulum model directly applied to normal human gait. , 2006, Clinical Biomechanics.

[22]  E. Westervelt,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Bipedal Robot Locomotion , 2007 .

[23]  M G Pandy,et al.  A numerical method for simulating the dynamics of human walking. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Hooshang Hemami,et al.  Some aspects of the inverted pendulum problem for modeling of locomotion systems , 1973 .

[25]  D A Winter,et al.  A mathematical model for the dynamics of human locomotion. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  J. Moreno,et al.  The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[27]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A Preliminary Assessment of Legged Mobility Provided by a Lower Limb Exoskeleton for Persons With Paraplegia , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  Hooshang Hemami,et al.  Postural and gait stability of a planar five link biped by simulation , 1977 .

[29]  Christine Chevallereau,et al.  Low energy cost reference trajectories for a biped robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[30]  Thomas S. Buchanan,et al.  BIOMECHANICS OF HUMAN MOVEMENT , 2005 .

[31]  M. Pandy,et al.  Synthesis of human walking: a planar model for single support. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Virtual Constraint Control of a Powered Prosthetic Leg: From Simulation to Experiments With Transfemoral Amputees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[33]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  An assistive controller for a lower-limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation after stroke, and preliminary assessment thereof , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  T McGeer,et al.  Dynamics and control of bipedal locomotion. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  Christine Chevallereau,et al.  RABBIT: a testbed for advanced control theory , 2003 .

[36]  J. Furusho,et al.  Control of a Dynamical Biped Locomotion System for Steady Walking , 1986 .

[37]  Guy Bessonnet,et al.  Generating globally optimised sagittal gait cycles of a biped robot , 2003, Robotica.

[38]  Ching-Long Shih Inverted pendulum-like walking pattern of a 5-link biped robot , 1997, 1997 8th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Proceedings. ICAR'97.

[39]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[40]  G. Cavagna,et al.  The sources of external work in level walking and running. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  Luca Consolini,et al.  Dynamic virtual holonomic constraints for stabilization of closed orbits in underactuated mechanical systems , 2017, Autom..

[42]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[43]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[44]  Tingfang Yan,et al.  Review of assistive strategies in powered lower-limb orthoses and exoskeletons , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[45]  Richard Baker,et al.  Appropriately complex modelling of healthy human walking , 2014 .

[46]  Robert Teasell,et al.  Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015 , 2016, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[47]  J. Grizzle,et al.  A Restricted Poincaré Map for Determining Exponentially Stable Periodic Orbits in Systems with Impulse Effects: Application to Bipedal Robots , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[48]  Ayush Agrawal,et al.  First Steps Towards Translating HZD Control of Bipedal Robots to Decentralized Control of Exoskeletons , 2017, IEEE Access.

[49]  Elliott J. Rouse,et al.  Evidence for a Time-Invariant Phase Variable in Human Ankle Control , 2014, PloS one.

[50]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[51]  P. Celnik,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation. , 2015, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.