Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in neutral populations

Cooperation is a difficult proposition in the face of Darwinian selection. Those that defect have an evolutionary advantage over cooperators who should therefore die out. However, spatial structure enables cooperators to survive through the formation of homogeneous clusters, which is the hallmark of network reciprocity. Here we go beyond this traditional setup and study the spatiotemporal dynamics of cooperation in a population of populations. We use the prisoner's dilemma game as the mathematical model and show that considering several populations simultaneously give rise to fascinating spatiotemporal dynamics and pattern formation. Even the simplest assumption that strategies between different populations are payoff-neutral with one another results in the spontaneous emergence of cyclic dominance, where defectors of one population become prey of cooperators in the other population, and vice versa. Moreover, if social interactions within different populations are characterized by significantly different temptations to defect, we observe that defectors in the population with the largest temptation counterintuitively vanish the fastest, while cooperators that hang on eventually take over the whole available space. Our results reveal that considering the simultaneous presence of different populations significantly expands the complexity of evolutionary dynamics in structured populations, and it allow us to understand the stability of cooperation under adverse conditions that could never be bridged by network reciprocity alone.

[1]  M. Nowak,et al.  SuperCooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed , 2011 .

[2]  H. Hinrichsen.  Non-equilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states , 2000, cond-mat/0001070.

[3]  Víctor M Eguíluz,et al.  Cooperation, social networks, and the emergence of leadership in a prisoner's dilemma with adaptive local interactions. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  N. Masuda.  Participation costs dismiss the advantage of heterogeneous networks in evolution of cooperation , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Statistical physics of crime: A review , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[6]  Marcus Frean,et al.  Rock–scissors–paper and the survival of the weakest , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Phase transitions induced by variation of invasion rates in spatial cyclic predator-prey models with four or six species. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[9]  J Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Social network reciprocity as a phase transition in evolutionary cooperation. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Statistical Physics of Human Cooperation , 2017, ArXiv.

[11]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[12]  H. Hinrichsen,et al.  Critical coarsening without surface tension: the universality class of the voter model. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[13]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Determinants of public cooperation in multiplex networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[14]  Mauro Mobilia,et al.  Reply to "Comment on 'Stochastic dynamics of the prisoner's dilemma with cooperation facilitators' ". , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Network reciprocity by coexisting learning and teaching strategies. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Lin Wang,et al.  Evolutionary games on multilayer networks: a colloquium , 2015, The European Physical Journal B.

[17]  D. Thouless.  Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 1972 .

[18]  David G. Rand,et al.  Static network structure can stabilize human cooperation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Sungmin Lee,et al.  Emergent hierarchical structures in multiadaptive games. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[20]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics , 2009, Physics of life reviews.

[21]  M. Nowak.  Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[22]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Multilayer networks , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[24]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[25]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[26]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Alison R Hwong,et al.  Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding , 2010 .

[28]  H. Stanley,et al.  Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 1972 .

[29]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Collective influence in evolutionary social dilemmas , 2016, ArXiv.

[30]  J Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[31]  R. Dickman,et al.  Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Lattice Models , 1999 .

[32]  Long Wang,et al.  Partner switching stabilizes cooperation in coevolutionary prisoner's dilemma. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[34]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Epidemic processes in complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[35]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems can Contribute , 2014, Journal of statistical physics.

[36]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Coevolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[37]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[38]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Second-order freeriding on antisocial punishment restores the effectiveness of prosocial punishment , 2017, bioRxiv.

[39]  Z. Wang,et al.  The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks , 2014, Physics Reports.

[40]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[41]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Cyclic dominance in evolutionary games: a review , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[42]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[43]  G. Szabó,et al.  Phase diagrams for an evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on two-dimensional lattices. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.