Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics.

Decision making can be facilitated by observing other individuals faced with the same or similar problem, and recent research suggests that this social information use is a widespread phenomenon. Implications of this are diverse and profound: for example, social information use may trigger cultural evolution, affect distribution and dispersal of populations, and involve intriguing cognitive traits. We emphasize here that social information use is a process consisting of the scenes of (1) event, (2) observation, (3) decision, and (4) consequence, where the initial event is a scene in such a process of another individual. This helps to construct a sound conceptual framework for measuring and studying social information use. Importantly, the potential value of social information is affected by the distance in time, space, and ecology between the initial observation and eventual consequence of a decision. Because negative interactions between individuals (such as direct and apparent competition) also depend on the distance between individuals along these dimensions, the potential value of information and the negative interactions may form a trade-off situation. Optimal solutions to this trade-off can result in adaptively extended social information use, where using information gathered some time ago, some distance away, and from ecologically different individuals is preferred. Conceivably, using information gathered from a heterospecific individual might often be optimal. Many recent studies demonstrate that social information use does occur between species, and the first review of published cases is provided here. Such interaction between species, especially in habitat selection, has important consequences for community ecology and conservation. Adaptively extended social information use may also be an important evolutionary force in guild formation. Complex coevolutionary patterns may result depending on the effect of information use on the provider of information.

[1]  P. Slater,et al.  Hornbills can distinguish between primate alarm calls , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  J. P. Gould.  Risk, stochastic preference, and the value of information , 1974 .

[3]  Sasha R. X. Dall.  Defining the Concept of Public Information , 2005, Science.

[4]  M. Koops.  Reliability and the value of information , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  H. Buchanan-Smith,et al.  The behavioural ecology of mixed‐species troops of callitrichine primates , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  T. Valone,et al.  Response: Defining the Concept of Public Information , 2005 .

[8]  J. Elmberg,et al.  Interspecific interactions and co-existence in dabbling ducks: observations and an experiment , 1997, Oecologia.

[9]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Responses by breeding birds to heterospecific song and mobbing call playbacks under varying predation risk , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  G. Uetz,et al.  Foraging advantages of mixed-species association between solitary and colonial orb-weaving spiders , 1996, Oecologia.

[11]  F. J. Diego-Rasilla,et al.  Heterospecific call recognition and phonotaxis in the orientation behavior of the marbled newt, Triturus marmoratus , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  H. Pöysä.  Public information and conspecific nest parasitism in goldeneyes: targeting safe nests by parasites , 2006 .

[13]  M. Whiting,et al.  Use of heterospecific cues by the lizard Platysaurus broadleyi for food location , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  Thomas R. Zentall,et al.  Imitation: definitions, evidence, and mechanisms , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[15]  A. Hattori.  Small and large anemonefishes can coexist using the same patchy resources on a coral reef, before habitat destruction , 2002 .

[16]  C. Fitzgibbon.  Mixed-species grouping in Thomson's and Grant's gazelles: the antipredator benefits , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  E. Heymann.  The relationship between body size and mixed-species troops of tamarins (Saguinus spp.). , 1997, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[18]  Mikko Mönkkönen,et al.  Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communites? , 1990, Oecologia.

[19]  M. Norconk.  Introductory remarks: Ecological and behavioral correlates of polyspecific primate troops , 1990, American journal of primatology.

[20]  T. Slagsvold.  Habitat Selection in Birds: On the Presence of Other Bird Species with Special Regard to Turdus pilaris , 1980 .

[21]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  The use of field–based social information in eusocial foragers: local enhancement among nestmates and heterospecifics in stingless bees , 2003 .

[22]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Mixed-species foraging aggregations and heterospecific attraction in boreal bird communities , 1996 .

[23]  M. Groom,et al.  How do frugivores track resources? Insights from spatial analyses of bird foraging in a tropical forest , 2004, Oecologia.

[24]  A. Lotem,et al.  The overlooked signaling component of nonsignaling behavior , 1999 .

[25]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  R. Bshary,et al.  Red colobus and Diana monkeys provide mutual protection against predators , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Arnon Lotem,et al.  Defining the concept of public information. , 2005, Science.

[28]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis , 2003, Oecologia.

[29]  K. Witte,et al.  Female sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna, remember males and copy the choice of others after 1 day , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  P. White,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology , 1999 .

[31]  Janne-Tuomas Seppänen,et al.  Mechanisms and fitness effects of interspecific information use between migrant and resident birds , 2007 .

[32]  I. Coolen,et al.  Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  D. Chivers,et al.  Fathead Minnows, Pimephales promelas, Learn to Recognize Chemical Alarm Cues of Introduced Brook Stickleback, Culaea inconstans , 2003, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[34]  L. Chittka,et al.  Social Learning: Public Information in Insects , 2005, Current Biology.

[35]  Louis Lefebvre,et al.  Carib Grackles Imitate Conspecific and Zenaida Dove Tutors , 1997 .

[36]  Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al.  Vicarious sampling: the use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  A. Whiten,et al.  On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom: Reappraisal of a Century of Research , 1992 .

[38]  K. Sullivan.  Information Exploitation By Downy Woodpeckers in Mixed-Species Flocks , 1984 .

[39]  A. Hattori.  Social and mating systems of the protandrous anemonefish Amphiprion perideraion under the influence of a larger congener , 2000 .

[40]  T. Sherry,et al.  Behavioral feeding specialization in Pinaroloxias inornata, the "Darwin's Finch" of Cocos Island, Costa Rica. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Interspecies semantic communication in two forest primates , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  E. D. Weinberger,et al.  A theory of pragmatic information and its application to the quasi-species model of biological evolution. , 2001, Bio Systems.

[43]  I. Owens,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL SHIFTS IN ISLAND‐DWELLING BIRDS: THE ROLES OF GENERALIST FORAGING AND NICHE EXPANSION , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  Claire Doutrelant,et al.  Timing of prospecting and the value of information in a colonial breeding bird , 1996 .

[45]  Robert J Fletcher,et al.  Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. , 2006, The American naturalist.

[46]  C. Randler.  Red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) respond to alarm calls of Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius) , 2006 .

[47]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  R. Veit,et al.  Nearest neighbors as foraging cues: information transfer in a patchy environment , 2004 .

[49]  David J. White,et al.  Differences between the sexes in direction and duration of response to seeing a potential sex partner mate with another , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[51]  G. Tavecchia,et al.  Woodpigeons nesting in association with hobby falcons: advantages and choice rules , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  L. Dugatkin.  Mistakes and the evolution of copying , 2005 .

[53]  Erick Greene,et al.  Allometry of Alarm Calls: Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size , 2005, Science.

[54]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  Heterospecific attraction affects community structure and migrant abundances in northern breeding bird communities , 1997 .

[55]  E. Goodale,et al.  Testing the roles of species in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rain forest , 2005, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[56]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  J. Mann,et al.  Cultural transmission of tool use in bottlenose dolphins. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[59]  Wladimir J Alonso,et al.  Deciding where to settle: conspecific attraction and web site selection in the orb-web spider Nephilengys cruentata , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Priming of plant defense responses in nature by airborne signaling between Artemisia tridentata and Nicotiana attenuata , 2006, Oecologia.

[61]  J. Nieh,et al.  Olfactory eavesdropping by a competitively foraging stingless bee, Trigona spinipes , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[63]  W. Piper,et al.  Prospecting in a solitary breeder: chick production elicits territorial intrusions in common loons , 2006 .

[64]  B. Doligez,et al.  Prospecting in the collared flycatcher: gathering public information for future breeding habitat selection? , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  J. Krebs,et al.  Arms races between and within species , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[66]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory , 1996 .

[67]  M. Ryan,et al.  The mixed-species chorus as public information: túngara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific , 2007 .

[68]  D. Parejo,et al.  Do avian brood parasites eavesdrop on heterospecific sexual signals revealing host quality? A review of the evidence , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[69]  J. Stamps.  Conspecific Attraction and Aggregation in Territorial Species , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[70]  B. Doligez,et al.  When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  A Houston,et al.  The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[72]  J. Franklin,et al.  Adaptive information and animal behaviour: Why motorists stop at red traffic lights , 1992 .

[73]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Paying for information: partial loads in central place foragers , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[74]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Mechanisms of heterospecific recognition in avian mobbing calls , 2003 .

[75]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  NONINTUITIVE CUE USE IN HABITAT SELECTION , 2005 .

[76]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest , 1998, Oecologia.

[77]  Presence of other species may counter seasonal decline in breeding success: a field experiment with pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca , 2005 .

[78]  E. Danchin,et al.  The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? , 2005 .

[79]  E. Jablonka.  Information: Its Interpretation, Its Inheritance, and Its Sharing , 2002, Philosophia Scientiæ.

[80]  A. Whiten,et al.  Cultures in chimpanzees , 1999, Nature.

[81]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Inadvertent social information in breeding site selection of natal dispersing birds , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[82]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Fear factor: prey habitat selection and its consequences in a predation risk landscape , 2006 .

[83]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Public Information and Breeding Habitat Selection in a Wild Bird Population , 2002, Science.

[84]  D. Madison,et al.  Behavioural responses by red-backed salamanders to conspecific and heterospecific cues , 2003 .

[85]  K. Laland.  Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[86]  D. Stephens.  Variance and the Value of Information , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[87]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation Can Enhance the Persistence and Abundance of Metapopulations Comprised of Coupled Sinks , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[88]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[89]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.