Protein Interactions with Microballoons: Consequences for Biocompatibility and Application as Contrast Agents

The role of proteins as the mediators of the interaction between engineered materials (biomaterials) and living systems has long been appreciated, but the subtleties and complexities introduced by changing surface curvature are only beginning to be understood. Thus, in implant devices, where the biomaterial is presented as a flat surface, a very limited range of proteins bind to the material, these being mainly albumin and fibrinogen. However, as the surface curvature increases (as we move towards micro and nano scale particles) novel effects are observed, and the materials begin to bind rarer specialized proteins with very high affinity, which has significant consequences for their biocompatibility and for their impacts on the biological system with which they interact. In the present work we present some findings from the EU project SIGHT in which the interactions of polymeric microballoons (gas-filled polymer-shelled devices that are being developed as contrast agents for theranostic applications) with plasma proteins are investigated, and the potential consequences for long term biocompatibility are discussed.

[1]  Sara Linse,et al.  Understanding the nanoparticle–protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  P. Serruys,et al.  Thirty-day incidence and six-month clinical outcome of thrombotic stent occlusion after bare-metal, sirolimus, or paclitaxel stent implantation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  N G Anderson,et al.  High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of human plasma proteins. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J. Yates,et al.  Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. , 1995, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  S. Kim,et al.  Effect of polymer surface modification on polymer-protein interaction via hydrophilic polymer grafting. , 2008, Journal of food science.

[6]  C. Doillon,et al.  New Approaches for Biocompatibility Testing Using Cell Culture , 1990, The International journal of artificial organs.

[7]  Timothy D Veenstra,et al.  Serum and plasma proteomics. , 2007, Chemical reviews.

[8]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  C. Galbraith,et al.  Cell-matrix adhesions on poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[10]  K. Dawson,et al.  Systematic investigation of the thermodynamics of HSA adsorption to N-iso-propylacrylamide/N-tert-butylacrylamide copolymer nanoparticles. Effects of particle size and hydrophobicity. , 2007, Nano letters.

[11]  Gaio Paradossi,et al.  Poly(vinyl alcohol) as versatile biomaterial for potential biomedical applications , 2003, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[12]  Cameron J Wilson,et al.  Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[13]  Akhilesh Pandey,et al.  Plasma Proteome Database as a resource for proteomics research , 2005, Proteomics.

[14]  Sara Linse,et al.  Detailed identification of plasma proteins adsorbed on copolymer nanoparticles. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  J. Klein Probing the interactions of proteins and nanoparticles , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Biological Responses to Materials , 2001 .

[17]  N. Zaffaroni,et al.  Tethering functional ligands onto shell of ultrasound active polymeric microbubbles. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[18]  D R Critchley,et al.  Focal adhesions - the cytoskeletal connection. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.