Adherence to clinical practice guidelines in the management of children, youth, and young adults with type 1 diabetes--a prospective population cohort study.

OBJECTIVE To describe adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of childhood type 1 diabetes and identify associated patient and system level factors. STUDY DESIGN This prospective cohort study used population-based administrative data to describe individuals aged 1-24 years who had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at <20 years of age (1472 unique individuals and 5883 person-years over a 7-year period) living in British Columbia, Canada. The outcome measure was proportion 'at goal,' which was defined as having optimal adherence (3 diabetes-related physician visits/year, 3 hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) tests/year, 1 glucagon prescription dispensed/year, and appropriate screening for diabetes-related comorbidity [ie, hypothyroidism] and complications [ie, retinopathy and nephropathy]), or good adherence to guidelines (2 diabetes-related physician visits/year, 2 HbA1c tests/year, and appropriate screening for diabetes-related comorbidity and complications). Statistical methods included descriptive statistics and logistic regression modeling. RESULTS Fifty-four percent person-years had poor adherence to guidelines (<2 diabetes-related physician visits and HbA1c tests/year) and 7.4% had optimal adherence. The proportion of person-years at goal was higher in females vs males (41.0% vs 37.6%; P = .007). Individuals 4-years post-diagnosis of diabetes were 78% less likely to be at goal compared with the year of diagnosis (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS The treatment of pediatric type 1 diabetes likely does not meet national and international standards. Future studies should explore facilitators and barriers to adherence to guidelines among health care providers, patients, and families, and whether adherence to guidelines is associated with glycemic control.

[1]  W. Abdullah Arch Dis Childhood , 1994 .

[2]  P A Cleary,et al.  Beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). , 2001, The Journal of pediatrics.

[3]  D. Christakis,et al.  Continuity and quality of care for children with diabetes who are covered by medicaid. , 2001, Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association.

[4]  Elizabeth A McGlynn,et al.  The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  G. Divine,et al.  Provider Type and the Receipt of General and Diabetes-Related Preventive Health Services Among Patients With Diabetes , 2001, Medical care.

[6]  J. Shield,et al.  Audit of diabetes care by caseload , 1997, Archives of disease in childhood.

[7]  J. Willett,et al.  Consequences of irregular versus continuous medical follow-up in children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1997, The Journal of pediatrics.

[8]  R. Hamman,et al.  The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study: Rationale, Findings, and Future Directions , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[9]  E. Danielson,et al.  Glycaemic control and diabetes care utilization in young adults with Type 1 diabetes 1 , 2008, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[10]  F. Kaufman,et al.  Association Between Diabetes Control and Visits to a Multidisciplinary Pediatric Diabetes Clinic , 1999, Pediatrics.

[11]  B. Waitzfelder,et al.  Adherence to Guidelines for Youths With Diabetes Mellitus , 2011, Pediatrics.

[12]  Korey K. Hood,et al.  Changes in Treatment Adherence and Glycemic Control During the Transition to Adolescence in Type 1 Diabetes , 2012, Diabetes Care.

[13]  A. Green,et al.  Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989–2003 and predicted new cases 2005–20: a multicentre prospective registration study , 2009, The Lancet.

[14]  J. A. Johnson,et al.  Validation of diabetes case definitions using administrative claims data , 2011, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[15]  Hans Krueger,et al.  Validation of classification algorithms for childhood diabetes identified from administrative data , 2012, Pediatric diabetes.

[16]  Dana Dabelea,et al.  Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. , 2007, JAMA.

[17]  V. Basevi,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2012 , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[18]  Petra Denig,et al.  Review: Relation Between Quality-of-Care Indicators for Diabetes and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review , 2011, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[19]  K. Dahl-Jørgensen,et al.  The establishment of a new national network leads to quality improvement in childhood diabetes: Implementation of the ISPAD Guidelines , 2010, Pediatric diabetes.