SPIDER surgical system for urologic procedures with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: from initial laboratory experience to first clinical application.

This case study describes our initial laboratory experience using the SPIDER surgical system (TransEnterix, Morrisville, NC, USA) for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) urologic procedures and reports its first clinical application. The SPIDER system was tested in a laboratory setting and used for a clinical case of renal cyst decortication. Three tasks were performed during the dry lab session, and different urologic procedures were conducted in a porcine model. The time to complete the tasks and penalties were registered during the dry lab session. Perioperative outcomes and subjective assessment by the surgeons were registered. The surgeons had a positive experience with the SPIDER system, with a mean overall score of 3.6 (on a scale of 1-5). The surgeons were able to gain proficiency in performing tasks regardless of their level of expertise. The highest scores recorded were for ease of device insertion, instrument insertion and exchange, and triangulation. The lowest scores were for retraction. During the clinical case, the platform provided good triangulation without instrument clashing. However, retraction was challenging because of the lack of strength and precise maneuverability with the tip of the instruments fully deployed. The SPIDER system offers intuitive instrument maneuverability and restored triangulation without external instrument clashing. Further refinements are awaited to define its role in the urologic LESS armamentarium.

[1]  A. Pryor,et al.  Single-port cholecystectomy with the TransEnterix SPIDER: simple and safe , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  G. Haber,et al.  Robotic laparoendoscopic single‐site surgery , 2010, BJU international.

[3]  J. Cadeddu,et al.  Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. , 2009, European urology.

[4]  Georges-Pascal Haber,et al.  Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. , 2010, Urology.

[5]  G. Bianchi,et al.  Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: preliminary experience in kidney and ureteral indications. , 2011, European urology.

[6]  Jihad H Kaouk,et al.  Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. , 2010, European urology.

[7]  P. Durani,et al.  The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: A Reliable and Valid Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure for Linear Scars , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  Daniel J Scott,et al.  Design of a Proficiency-Based Skills Training Curriculum for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery , 2007, Surgical innovation.

[9]  Georges-Pascal Haber,et al.  Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: technique and early outcomes. , 2010, European urology.

[10]  Estevão Lima,et al.  Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. , 2011, European urology.

[11]  P. Fornara,et al.  Single-portal access laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in transplant patients: the first experience. , 2011, European urology.

[12]  S. Bhayani,et al.  Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. , 2009, European urology.

[13]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Laparoendoscopic single-site repair of retrocaval ureter: first case report. , 2010, Urology.

[14]  J. Cadeddu Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: Matched-pair comparison , 2010 .

[15]  J. Stolzenburg,et al.  Technique of laparoscopic-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. , 2009, European urology.