Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element.

Axial compression on the spine could reach large values especially in lifting tasks which also involve large rotations. Experimental and numerical investigations on the spinal multi motion segments in presence of physiological compression loads cannot adequately be carried out due to the structural instability and artefact loads. To circumvent these problems, a novel wrapping cable element is used in a nonlinear finite element model of the lumbosacral spine (L1-S1) to investigate the role of moderate to large compression loads on the lumbar stiffness in flexion and axial moments/rotations. The compression loads up to 2,700 N was applied with no instability or artefact loads. The lumbar stiffness substantially increased under compression force, flexion moment, and axial torque when applied alone. The presence of compression preloads significantly stiffened the load-displacement response under flexion and axial moments/rotations. This stiffening effect was much more pronounced under larger preloads and smaller moments/rotations. Compression preloads also increased intradiscal pressure, facet contact forces, and maximum disc fibre strain at different levels. Forces in posterior ligaments were, however, diminished with compression preload. The significant increase in spinal stiffness, hence, should be considered in biomechanical studies for accurate investigation of the load partitioning, system stability, and fixation systems/disc prostheses.

[1]  J. Kelsey,et al.  An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Dynamics of Human Lumbar Intervertebral Joints: Experimental and Finite‐Element Investigations , 1992, Spine.

[3]  T R Oxland,et al.  In vitro axial preload application during spine flexibility testing: towards reduced apparatus-related artefacts. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Avinash G Patwardhan,et al.  Effect of compressive follower preload on the flexion–extension response of the human lumbar spine , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  Adams Ma,et al.  Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc: A Hyperflexion Injury , 1982 .

[6]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Analysis of role of bone compliance on mechanics of a lumbar motion segment. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Nonlinear Response Analysis of the Human Ligamentous Lumbar Spine in Compression: On Mechanisms Affecting the Postural Stability , 1993, Spine.

[8]  A B Schultz,et al.  Large compressive preloads decrease lumbar motion segment flexibility , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Strain in Fibers of a Lumbar Disc: Analysis of the Role of Lifting in Producing Disc Prolapse , 1989, Spine.

[10]  M Parnianpour,et al.  Stabilizing role of moments and pelvic rotation on the human spine in compression. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  A. Shirazi-Adl Nonlinear stress analysis of the whole lumbar spine in torsion--mechanics of facet articulation. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  M. Adams,et al.  Gradual Disc Prolapse , 1985, Spine.

[13]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. , 1989, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  M Parnianpour,et al.  Load-bearing and stress analysis of the human spine under a novel wrapping compression loading. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Robert Roaf,et al.  A STUDY OF THE MECHANICS OF SPINAL INJURIES , 1960 .

[16]  Rolander Sd,et al.  Deformation and fracture of the lumbar vertebral end plate. , 1975 .

[17]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Biomechanics of the Lumbar Spine in Sagittal/Lateral Moments , 1994, Spine.

[18]  J D Troup,et al.  Back Pain in Industry: A Prospective Survey , 1981, Spine.

[19]  A. Shirazi-Adl Nonlinear finite element analysis of wrapping uniaxial elements , 1989 .

[20]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Mechanical Response of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Axial Torque Alone and Combined with Compression , 1986, Spine.

[21]  I. Stokes,et al.  Physiological axial compressive preloads increase motion segment stiffness, linearity and hysteresis in all six degrees of freedom for small displacements about the neutral posture , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  A. M. Ahmed,et al.  Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study. , 1984, Spine.

[23]  M. Adams,et al.  A technique for quantifying the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine in vivo. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  L Claes,et al.  Influence of a Follower Load on Intradiscal Pressure and Intersegmental Rotation of the Lumbar Spine , 2001, Spine.

[25]  G. Andersson,et al.  Low‐Back Pain in 40− to 47‐Year-Old Men: Work History and Work Environment Factors , 1983, Spine.

[26]  Y. K. Liu,et al.  Mechanical response of the lumbar intervertebral joint under physiological (complex) loading. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  M. Panjabi,et al.  The Intersegmental and Multisegmental Muscles of the Lumbar Spine: A Biomechanical Model Comparing Lateral Stabilizing Potential , 1991, Spine.

[28]  W. Tawackoli,et al.  The Effect of Compressive Axial Preload on the Flexibility of the Thoracolumbar Spine , 2004, Spine.

[29]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. , 1999, Spine.