Song and brain development in canaries raised under different conditions of acoustic and social isolation over two years

Early isolation experiments indicate that male songbirds learn their songs during an early sensitive period, although later work has shown that some open‐ended learners modify songs in later years. Recent isolation experiments suggest that in some species song has a stronger genetic basis than previously thought. This study raised domestic canaries under different combinations of acoustic and social isolation and followed song development into the second year. Males raised alone in acoustic isolation developed songs with normal syllables, but larger repertoires and also produced syllables with lower repetition rates when compared to controls. The smallest repertoire occurred in males raised in a peer group. Isolate males had a smaller song control nucleus HVC than controls, but there was no effect on nucleus RA or on brain weight in general. In the second year, after introduction into a large normal colony, isolate and peer group males adjusted their syllable repertoire to normal size. In particular, the isolates reduced their repertoire even though the size of HVC showed a significant increase in volume. However, songs of isolate and peer group males still differ in repetition rate and number of single syllables in the common aviary. In contrast, control males showed low syllable turnover and no significant change in repertoire size. Nor did they show any significant change in the volumes of song control nuclei. It seems that complete isolation affects only some aspects of song and brain development, and later socialization corrects some but not all of these in the second year. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol, 2007

[1]  R. Griffiths,et al.  A DNA test to sex most birds , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[2]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  Social context affects testosterone-induced singing and the volume of song control nuclei in male canaries (Serinus canaria). , 2006, Journal of neurobiology.

[3]  W. H. Thorpe,et al.  THE LEARNING OF SONG PATTERNS BY BIRDS, WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE SONG OF THE CHAFFINCH FRINGILLA COELEBS , 2008 .

[4]  N. Clayton Song tutor choice in zebra finches , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  C. Catchpole,et al.  Syllable repertoire and the size of the song control system in captive canaries (Serinus canaria). , 2004, Journal of neurobiology.

[6]  P. Slater,et al.  SONG DEVELOPMENT IN CHFFINCHES: WHAT IS LEARNT AND WHEN? , 2008 .

[7]  M. Gahr,et al.  Effects of unilateral lesions of HVC on song patterns of male domesticated canaries. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[8]  L. Baptista,et al.  Social interaction, sensitive phases and the song template hypothesis in the white-crowned sparrow , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  M. Kreutzer,et al.  Two-note syllables in canary songs elicit high levels of sexual display , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  A. Bass Dimorphic male brains and alternative reproductive tactics in a vocalizing fish , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  P. Marler,et al.  Song learning in canaries. , 1977 .

[12]  Felix Naef,et al.  Freedom and Rules: The Acquisition and Reprogramming of a Bird's Learned Song , 2005, Science.

[13]  C. Catchpole,et al.  Female canaries that respond and discriminate more between male songs of different quality have a larger song control nucleus (HVC) in the brain. , 2002, Journal of neurobiology.

[14]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[15]  A. C. Yu,et al.  Temporal Hierarchical Control of Singing in Birds , 1996, Science.

[16]  Manfred Gahr,et al.  Seasonal changes in the song pattern of the non-domesticated island canary (Serinus canaria), a field study , 2001 .

[17]  M. Metfessel ROLLER CANARY SONG PRODUCED WITHOUT LEARNING FROM EXTERNAL SOURCES. , 1935, Science.

[18]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Developmental and seasonal changes in canary song and their relation to changes in the anatomy of song-control nuclei. , 1986, Behavioral and neural biology.

[19]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Song development by Black-capped Chickadees (Parus atricapillus) and Carolina Chickadees (P. carolinensis) , 1995 .

[20]  P. Marler,et al.  Role of auditory feedback in canary song development. , 1977, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[21]  C. Poirier,et al.  Direct social contacts override auditory information in the song-learning process in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  László Zsolt Garamszegi,et al.  Brain space for a learned task: strong intraspecific evidence for neural correlates of singing behavior in songbirds , 2004, Brain Research Reviews.

[23]  K. Lehongre,et al.  Long-term effect of isolation rearing conditions on songs of an ‘open-ended’ song learner species, the canary , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  L. Baptista,et al.  Social influences on vocal development: Social interaction and vocal development in birds , 1997 .

[25]  L. A. Eales Song learning in zebra finches: some effects of song model availability on what is learnt and when , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  C. Catchpole,et al.  Song and the song control pathway in the brain can develop independently of exposure to song in the sedge warbler , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .

[28]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Song development by grey catbirds , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  P. Marler,et al.  Innate differences in singing behaviour of sparrows reared in isolation from adult conspecific song , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  Peter Marler,et al.  Song acquisition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris: a comparison of the songs of live-tutored, tape-tutored, untutored, and wild-caught males , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  M. Kreutzer,et al.  Female canaries are sexually responsive to special song phrases , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  F. Nottebohm AUDITORY EXPERIENCE AND SONG DEVELOPMENT IN THE CHAFFINCH FRINGILLA COELEBS , 2008 .