Multicollinearity and missing constraints: A comparison of three approaches for the analysis of latent nonlinear effects.

Multicollinearity complicates the simultaneous estimation of interaction and quadratic effects in structural equation modeling (SEM). So far, approaches developed within the Kenny-Judd (1984) tradition have failed to specify additional and necessary constraints on the measurement error covariances of the nonlinear indicators. Given that the constraints comprise, in part, latent linear predictor correlations, multicollinearity poses a problem for such approaches. Klein and Moosbrugger’s (2000) latent moderated structural equations approach (LMS) approach does not utilize nonlinear indicators and should therefore not be affected by this problem. In the context of a simulation study, we varied predictor correlation and the number of nonlinear effects in order to compare the performance of three approaches developed for the estimation of simultaneous nonlinear effects: Ping’s (1996) two-step approach, a correctly extended Joreskog-Yang (1996) approach, and LMS. Results show that in contrast to the Joreskog-Ya...

[1]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[2]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[3]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[4]  Yasuo Amemiya,et al.  Generalized Appended Product Indicator Procedure for Nonlinear Structural Equation Analysis , 2001 .

[5]  L. Hayduk,et al.  Latent Variable Interaction and Quadratic Effect Estimation: A Two-Step Technique Using Structural Equation Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  James Algina,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Estimating and Testing Latent Variable Interactions , 2002 .

[7]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology , 1987 .

[8]  A. Goldberger,et al.  On the Exact Covariance of Products of Random Variables , 1969 .

[9]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. , 1995 .

[10]  L. E. Jones,et al.  Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. , 1983 .

[11]  John Fox,et al.  TEACHER'S CORNER: Structural Equation Modeling With the sem Package in R , 2006 .

[12]  James Jaccard,et al.  Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. , 1995 .

[13]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Monte Carlo Experiments: Design and Implementation , 2001 .

[14]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Advanced structural equation modeling : issues and techniques , 1996 .

[15]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. , 1984 .

[16]  Helfried Moosbrugger,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method , 2000 .

[17]  E. Tanke,et al.  Behavior and attitude: Some people are more consistent than others. , 1976 .

[18]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[19]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[20]  Yasuo Amemiya,et al.  Estimation for Polynomial Structural Equation Models , 2000 .

[21]  Yoav Ganzach,et al.  Misleading Interaction and Curvilinear Terms , 1997 .

[22]  B. Muthén,et al.  A Bayesian approach to nonlinear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the metropolis-hastings algorithm , 1998 .

[23]  R. Fildes Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B): Gary K. Grunwald, Adrian E. Raftery and Peter Guttorp, 1993, “Time series of continuous proportions”, 55, 103–116.☆ , 1993 .

[24]  Fan Yang,et al.  Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with Interaction effects , 1996 .

[25]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Multicollinearity and Measurement Error in Structural Equation Models: Implications for Theory Testing , 2004 .

[26]  James Algina,et al.  A Note on Estimating the Jöreskog-Yang Model for Latent Variable Interaction Using LISREL 8.3 , 2001 .

[27]  Sik-Yum Lee,et al.  Comparison of Approaches in Estimating Interaction and Quadratic Effects of Latent Variables , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[28]  Helfried Moosbrugger,et al.  Challenges in Nonlinear Structural Equation Modeling , 2007 .

[29]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[30]  R. Ping A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables , 1995 .

[31]  H. Marsh,et al.  Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[32]  James A. Bovaird,et al.  On the Merits of Orthogonalizing Powered and Product Terms: Implications for Modeling Interactions Among Latent Variables , 2006 .

[33]  James R. Brown,et al.  Interdependency, Contracting, and Relational Behavior in Marketing Channels: , 1996 .

[34]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS THAT ARE NONLINEAR IN LATENT VARIABLES: A LEAST- SQUARES ESTIMATOR , 1995 .