Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) is one of the most debated topics in the field of education. The polemic on MOOCs was sparked by the emergence of extension MOOCs (xMOOCs) in late 2011. Highly disputed issues about MOOCs range from their quality to the potential impact of the courses on higher education in both developed and developing countries. This paper discusses, from the learner’s perspective, the quality of MOOCs and their potential contribution to widening participation and improving quality in Rwandan higher education. To gain first-hand experience as a learner, I enrolled in one cMOOC and three xMOOCs. I compared and contrasted the four MOOCs with my previous radio, online and face-to-face courses and learning with institutions across five continents. I conducted a crosscase analysis of the four MOOCs and six categories under which my previous courses fall. Through this analysis, I identified the recurring patterns and organised them into five themes: openness, availability, diversity, delivery and interactivity. I argue that MOOCs are currently among the most open courses and can lead to meaningful learning. Face-to-face and other kinds of online courses provide more interaction with the tutor than MOOCs do. Face-to-face course also provide the campus experience with peers which is absent in online courses. However, MOOCs and other online courses are superior to face-to-face courses in terms of flexible delivery and the 24 hour per day availability. Some MOOCs are also more diverse in terms of participants, activities and assessment. Despite various constraints, xMOOCs can mitigate financial difficulties and the shortage of higher education teachers in Rwanda. They can also trigger the empowerment among Rwandan students and learners. Both xMOOCs and cMOOCs can enable network creation and maintenance, multicultural educational experience and lifelong learning in that country. The paper closes with an argument that MOOCs can contribute to widening access and improving quality in higher education globally, and specifically in Rwanda.
[1]
Roy Williams,et al.
The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC
,
2010
.
[2]
James G. Mazoué,et al.
The MOOC Model: Challenging Traditional Education
,
2014
.
[3]
T. Anderson.
Getting the Mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for Interaction
,
2003
.
[4]
C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.
MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses.
,
2012
.
[5]
J. Daniel,et al.
Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author :
,
2013
.
[6]
Andrew Lane,et al.
OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES AND WIDENING PARTICIPATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: INNOVATIONS AND LESSONS FROM OPEN UNIVERSITIES
,
2011
.
[7]
Andrew Lane,et al.
The Impact of Openness on Bridging Educational Digital Divides
,
2009
.
[8]
Antonio Fini,et al.
The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools
,
2009
.
[9]
D. Keegan,et al.
Three Types of Interaction
,
2013
.