Adaptive planning in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancers: single-institution experience and clinical implications.

PURPOSE Anatomic changes and positional variability during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer can lead to clinically significant dosimetric changes. We report our single-institution experience using an adaptive protocol and correlate these changes with anatomic and positional changes during treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-three sequential head and neck IMRT patients underwent serial computed tomography (CT) scans during their radiation course. After undergoing the planning CT scan, patients underwent planned rescans at 11, 22, and 33 fractions; a total of 89 scans with 129 unique CT plan combinations were thus analyzed. Positional variability and anatomic changes during treatment were correlated with changes in dosimetric parameters to target and avoidance structures between planning CT and subsequent scans. RESULTS A total of 15/23 patients (65%) benefited from adaptive planning, either due to inadequate dose to gross disease or to increased dose to organs at risk. Significant differences in primary and nodal targets (planning target volume, gross tumor volume, and clinical tumor volume), parotid, and spinal cord dosimetric parameters were noted throughout the treatment. Correlations were established between these dosimetric changes and weight loss, fraction number, multiple skin separations, and change in position of the skull, mandible, and cervical spine. CONCLUSIONS Variations in patient positioning and anatomy changes during IMRT for head and neck cancer can affect dosimetric parameters and have wide-ranging clinical implications. The interplay between random positional variability and gradual anatomic changes requires careful clinical monitoring and frequent use of CT- based image-guided radiation therapy, which should determine variations necessitating new plans.

[1]  J. Deasy,et al.  A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: initial results. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  M. Yewondwossen,et al.  Spatial and dosimetric variability of organs at risk in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  David D. Smith,et al.  Pitch, roll, and yaw variations in patient positioning. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Prakash Chinnaiyan,et al.  The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  L. Mell,et al.  Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy use in the U.S., 2004 , 2005, Cancer.

[7]  A. Eisbruch,et al.  Future issues in highly conformal radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Avraham Eisbruch,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced paranasal sinus tumors: incorporating clinical decisions in the optimization process. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Alex Lukaj,et al.  Random positional variation among the skull, mandible, and cervical spine with treatment progression during head-and-neck radiotherapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  T. Vuong,et al.  Impact of geometric uncertainties on dose distribution during intensity modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer: the need for a planning target volume and a planning organ-at-risk volume , 2006, Current oncology.

[11]  K. Vineberg,et al.  Dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: which anatomic structures are affected and can they be spared by IMRT? , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Parotid gland dose in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: is what you plan what you get? , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Sadek Nehmeh,et al.  Fluorine-18-labeled fluoromisonidazole positron emission and computed tomography-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a feasibility study. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.