Expected Outcomes of a Construction Career: Gender Identity and Engineers Without Borders-USA

This qualitative study will analyze the motivations and expected outcomes and identities of a construction career as seen by a unique cohort of engineering students—volunteers of Engineers Without Borders-USA (EWB-USA). These volunteers are a diverse group who defy the stereotypes and statistics of the construction profession by displaying near balanced ratio of males to females. EWBUSA is a service organization comprised of student and professional volunteers. Unlike most engineering and construction organizations, it experiences 30-40% female membership. As such, it has been chosen as a strategic research site to investigate the motivations and expected outcomes of EWB-USA volunteers. This research project held focus groups with female and male students attending the 2011 EWB-USA conference. Qualitative analysis of the discussion supported the hypothesis that EWB-USA volunteers report altruistic motivations for entering engineering than do their non-volunteer peers. In addition, it highlights different motivations amongst males and females, with females citing mentorship and a sense of community frequently, whereas the male groups cited patriotism and travel. The implications of these findings may offer suggestions to help attract and retain women in engineering, including emphasizing humanitarian aspects of engineering and developing mentorship programs.

[1]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  Ellen L. Usher,et al.  Sources of Self-Efficacy in School: Critical Review of the Literature and Future Directions , 2008 .

[3]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  The Relationship of Career-Related Self-Efficacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College Women and Men. , 1981 .

[4]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses , 2001 .

[5]  Shannon K. Gilmartin,et al.  Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) , 2010 .

[6]  Antonio M. Lopez,et al.  Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines , 2008 .

[7]  R. Burke,et al.  Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics : upping the numbers , 2007 .

[8]  D. Shen,et al.  Women Engineering Students and Self‐Efficacy: A Multi‐Year, Multi‐Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self‐Efficacy , 2009 .

[9]  Matthew J. Miller,et al.  Testing the choice model of social cognitive career theory across Holland themes: A meta-analytic path analysis. , 2010 .

[10]  Collecting, analyzing, and interpreting focus group data. , 2000, AORN journal.

[11]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[12]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[13]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .