Development and evaluation of a field-based high-throughput phenotyping platform.

Physiological and developmental traits that vary over time are difficult to phenotype under relevant growing conditions. In this light, we developed a novel system for phenotyping dynamic traits in the field. System performance was evaluated on 25 Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) cultivars grown in 2011 at Maricopa, Arizona. Field-grown plants were irrigated under well watered and water-limited conditions, with measurements taken at different times on 3 days in July and August. The system carried four sets of sensors to measure canopy height, reflectance and temperature simultaneously on four adjacent rows, enabling the collection of phenotypic data at a rate of 0.84ha h-1. Measurements of canopy height, normalised difference vegetation index and temperature all showed large differences among cultivars and expected interactions of cultivars with water regime and time of day. Broad-sense heritabilities (H2)were highest for canopy height (H2=0.86-0.96), followed by the more environmentally sensitive normalised difference vegetation index (H2=0.28-0.90) and temperature (H2=0.01-0.90) traits. We also found a strong agreement (r2=0.35-0.82) between values obtained by the system, and values from aerial imagery and manual phenotyping approaches. Taken together, these results confirmed the ability of the phenotyping system to measure multiple traits rapidly and accurately.

[1]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  A Flexible, Low‐Cost Cart for Proximal Sensing , 2013 .

[2]  A. French,et al.  Decreased CO2 availability and inactivation of Rubisco limit photosynthesis in cotton plants under heat and drought stress in the field , 2012 .

[3]  F. Baret,et al.  A semi-automatic system for high throughput phenotyping wheat cultivars in-field conditions: description and first results. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[4]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research , 2012 .

[5]  M. Tester,et al.  Phenomics--technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[6]  Nigel Hancock,et al.  ENGINEERING AND GINNING Apparatus and Infield Evaluations of a Prototype Machine Vision System for Cotton Plant Internode Length Measurement , 2010 .

[7]  S. Omholt,et al.  Phenomics: the next challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  J. Holland,et al.  Estimating and Interpreting Heritability for Plant Breeding: An Update , 2010 .

[9]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  Glossary of terms on animal housing: interconnecting engineering, physical and physiological definitions. , 2009 .

[10]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Development of an Integration Sensor and Instrumentation System for Measuring Crop Conditions , 2009 .

[11]  H. Piepho,et al.  Computing Heritability and Selection Response From Unbalanced Plant Breeding Trials , 2007, Genetics.

[12]  Jochen C Reif,et al.  Novel throughput phenotyping platforms in plant genetic studies. , 2007, Trends in plant science.

[13]  I. M. Scotford,et al.  Estimating Tiller Density and Leaf Area Index of Winter Wheat using Spectral Reflectance and Ultrasonic Sensing Techniques , 2004 .

[14]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Collecting Spectral Data over Cropland Vegetation Using Machine-Positioning versus Hand-Positioning of the Sensor , 2004 .

[15]  Frank-M. Göttsche,et al.  Modelling of diurnal cycles of brightness temperature extracted from METEOSAT data , 2001 .

[16]  A. Worland,et al.  Time-related mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying tiller number in rice. , 1999, Genetics.

[17]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[18]  A. Water Diagnostic Assessments of Plant Condition Using Multiangular Remote Sensing Measurements and BRDF Models , 1997 .

[19]  F. D. Tompkins,et al.  A microcomputer-based morphometer for bush-type plants , 1989 .

[20]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Review Article Principles of field spectroscopy , 1987 .

[21]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Principles of field spectroscopy , 1987 .

[22]  John A. Harrington,et al.  On defining remote sensing , 1986 .

[23]  Daniel S. Kimes,et al.  Remote Sensing of Temperature Profiles in Vegetation Canopies Using Multiple View Angles And Inversion Techniques , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Plant Growth Analysis: The Rationale Behind the Use of the Fitted Mathematical Function , 1979 .

[25]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[26]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .