The Vicksburg Formation of Texas: Depositional Systems Distribution, Sequence Stratigraphy, and Petroleum Geology

The lower Oligocene Vicksburg Formation of the Gulf Coastal plain contains major petroleum reservoirs in the Rio Grande embayment and is an economically viable target in other areas of Texas. Knowledge of the distribution of Vicksburg depositional systems is essential to understanding sandstone concentrations and, therefore, is fundamental to effective exploration and production of the Vicksburg section. The depositional setting of the Vicksburg reservoirs, their position in a sequence stratigraphic framework, and the influence these factors have on the petroleum geology of the Vicksburg are the focus of this paper. Surface and subsurface geological and geophysical data provided the framework for an analysis of the depositional systems and the petroleum geology of the Vic sburg. The two primary Texas Vicksburg depocenters, the Rio Grande embayment and the Houston embayment, are separated by the San Marcos arch, a deep-rooted structural nose. Within the embayments, sand-rich deltaic complexes merged along strike with barrier/strand plains. Contemporaneous growth faulting controlled depositional patterns of shelf-edge deltas in the Rio Grande embayment, but had only a minor effect on the configuration of the shelfal deltas in the Houston embayment. Smaller wave-dominated shelf delta complexes interspersed with barrier/strand plains extended across the San Marcos arch. Updip of these sandy paralic depocenters, fluvial systems traversed mud-rich coastal plain units. Seaward of the paralic systems, sand and mud deposits prograded across and built up over the r lict Jackson shelf and shelf-margin shales. These depositional complexes are contained in the systems tracts of one eustatic (Exxon) sequence. Vicksburg production from each of the three structural regions of Texas is characterized by reservoirs from different systems tracts and of distinct, different depositional origins.

[1]  J. H. McGowen,et al.  Depositional systems in the Wilcox Group of Texas and their relationship to occurrence of oil and gas , 1967 .

[2]  William E. Galloway,et al.  Atlas of Major Texas Oil Reservoirs , 1984 .

[3]  R. Fairbanks,et al.  Tertiary oxygen isotope synthesis, sea level history, and continental margin erosion , 1987 .

[4]  William L. Fisher,et al.  Facies Characterization of Gulf Coast Basin Delta Systems, with Some Holocene Analogues , 1969 .

[5]  J. Coleman,et al.  Petroleum Geology of the Vicksburg Formation, Texas , 1990 .

[6]  T. Ashford GEOSEISMIC HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF RINCON FIELD, SOUTH TEXAS , 1972 .

[7]  C. Handford,et al.  Depositional and Tectonic Evolution of a Basement-Bounded, Intracratonic Basin, Palo Duro Basin, Texas: ABSTRACT , 1980 .

[8]  William E. Galloway,et al.  Growth Faults and Fault-Related Structures of Prograding Terrigenous Clastic Continental Margins , 1986 .

[9]  R. L. Freed Shale Mineralogy and Burial Diagenesis of Frio and Vicksburg Formations in Two Geopressured Wells, Mcallen Ranch Area, Hidalgo County, Texas , 1981 .

[10]  R. Loucks Sandstone distribution and potential for geopressured geothermal energy production in the Vicksburg Formation along the Texas Gulf Coast. , 1978 .

[11]  C. Winker Cenozoic Shelf Margins, Northwestern Gulf of Mexico(*) , 1982 .

[12]  R. R. Berg,et al.  Abnormal Pressures in the Lower Vicksburg, McAllen Ranch Field, South Texas , 1982 .

[13]  W. E. Galloway,et al.  Frio Formation of Texas Gulf Coastal Plain: Depositional Systems, Structural Framework, and Hydrocarbon Distribution , 1982 .

[14]  Louis A. Dramis Structural Control of Lower Vicksburg (Oligocene) Turbidite Channel Sandstones, McAllen Ranch Field, Texas: ABSTRACT , 1981 .

[15]  R. S. Bishop Shale Diapir Emplacement in South Texas: Laward and Sherriff Examples , 1977 .

[16]  J. H. McGowen,et al.  Delta systems in the exploration for oil and gas. , 1969 .

[17]  O. Serra,et al.  Fundamentals of well-log interpretation , 1984 .