Risk assessment of hydrogen generation unit considering dependencies using integrated DEMATEL and TOPSIS approach

Abstract Hydrogen generation is with highly operational risk, and the catastrophic consequence may be caused as hydrogen is easily inflammable and explosive. It is of great importance to perform an effective risk assessment to ensure the operational safety of hydrogen generation unit. This paper presents a novel framework comprising of fuzzy DEMATEL implemented with TOPSIS to assess the comprehensive risk of hydrogen generation unit. This methodology is capable of capturing the interdependencies among different hazards, and prioritize the hazards in the decision-making process. An index-based risk assessment system is built by identifying hazards related to hydrogen generation. Subsequently, fuzzy DEMATEL is used to extract the interrelationships among risk indices and determine their weights, and TOPSIS model is utilized to prioritize hazards and calculate their risk values. Eventually, the risk of hydrogen generation unit is assessed by integrating the initial risk values with the weights of evaluation indices. The safety strategies based on assessment outcomes are developed to reduce the risk of hydrogen generation. A case study is used to test the practicability of the methodology, and it is observed that it can be a useful tool to risk assessment and management of hydrogen generation unit.

[1]  Shuxin Wang,et al.  Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for the motion performance of autonomous underwater vehicles , 2014 .

[2]  Guoming Chen,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian network based approach for risk analysis of hydrogen generation unit leakage , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[3]  Xinhong Li,et al.  An integrated methodology to manage risk factors of aging urban oil and gas pipelines , 2020 .

[4]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Multiattribute decision making based on novel score function of intuitionistic fuzzy values and modified VIKOR method , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Mohammad Yazdi,et al.  Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach , 2018, Safety Science.

[6]  Jihao Shi,et al.  Stochastic explosion risk analysis of hydrogen production facilities , 2020 .

[7]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  Best practice guidelines in numerical simulations and CFD benchmarking for hydrogen safety applications , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[8]  Doraid M. Dalalah A hybrid DEMATEL-TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Making model , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration.

[9]  Il Moon,et al.  Simulation of hydrogen leak and explosion for the safety design of hydrogen fueling station in Korea , 2013 .

[10]  J. Sakamoto,et al.  Simulation-based safety investigation of a hydrogen fueling station with an on-site hydrogen production system involving methylcyclohexane , 2017 .

[11]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk assessment of process system considering dependencies , 2018, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[12]  R. Sadiq,et al.  Analyzing system safety and risks under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: An innovative approach , 2013 .

[13]  Liu We Research on comprehensive evaluation model for chemical equipment operation reliability , 2015 .

[14]  Guowei Ma,et al.  A grid-based risk screening method for fire and explosion events of hydrogen refuelling stations , 2018 .

[16]  Rouzbeh Abbassi,et al.  Improved DEMATEL methodology for effective safety management decision-making , 2020 .

[17]  Maryam Ahmadi,et al.  Identifying critical success factors in Heart Failure Self-Care using fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[18]  Pengyu Chen,et al.  Effects of normalization on the entropy-based TOPSIS method , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Lee D. Han,et al.  A proposed semi-quantitative framework for comprehensive risk assessment of urban hazard installations considering rescue accessibility and evacuation vulnerability , 2018, Safety Science.

[20]  Belkhir Negrou,et al.  Preliminary hazard identification for risk assessment on a complex system for hydrogen production , 2020 .

[21]  Liangbin Xu,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian networks based approach for risk analysis of subsea wellhead fatigue failure during service life , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Ming Yang,et al.  An integrated framework for subsea pipelines safety analysis considering causation dependencies , 2019, Ocean Engineering.

[23]  Quang-Vu Bach,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment of an urban hydrogen refueling station , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[24]  Jiafu Su,et al.  A combined fuzzy DEMATEL and TOPSIS approach for estimating participants in knowledge-intensive crowdsourcing , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[25]  Zhiyong Li,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis of life safety and financial loss for road accident of fuel cell vehicle , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.