A statistical analysis of consumer perceptions towards automated vehicles and their intended adoption

ABSTRACT While automated vehicle (AV) development continues to progress rapidly, how the public will accept and adopt automated vehicles remains an open question. Using extensive survey data, we apply cluster analysis to better understand consumer perceptions toward potential benefits and concerns related to AVs with regard to factors influencing their AV adoption likelihood. Four market segments are identified – ‘benefits-dominated,’ ‘concerns-dominated,’ ‘uncertain,’ and ‘well-informed.’ A random parameters multinomial logit model is then estimated to identify factors influencing the probability of respondents belonging to one of these four market segments. Among other influences (such as socio-economic and current travel characteristics), it is found that ‘Millennials’ have a higher probability of belonging to the well-informed market segment, ‘Gen-Xers’ with a lower probability to the uncertain market segment, and ‘Baby Boomers’ with a higher probability to the concerns-dominated market (relative to the ‘Great Generation’). We also study the individuals’ expressed likelihood of AV adoption using separate random parameters ordered probit estimations for each of the four market segments. The substantial and statistically significant differences across each AV consumer market segment underscore the potentially large impact that different consumer demographics may have on AV adoption and the need for targeted marketing to achieve better market-penetration outcomes.

[1]  E. Hildebrand Dimensions in elderly travel behaviour: A simplified activity-based model using lifestyle clusters , 2003 .

[2]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Occupant injury severities in hybrid-vehicle involved crashes: A random parameters approach with heterogeneity in means and variances , 2017 .

[3]  Bryce Stout,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of the Effects of Cohort Training and Follow-Up on the Outcomes of Short-Term Missions , 2017 .

[4]  Fred L Mannering,et al.  A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Ali Shamshiripour,et al.  Eliciting preferences for adoption of fully automated vehicles using best-worst analysis , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[6]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Joint Model of Choice of Residential Neighborhood and Bicycle Ownership , 2008 .

[7]  F. Mannering,et al.  The effect of passengers on driver-injury severities in single-vehicle crashes: A random parameters heterogeneity-in-means approach , 2017 .

[8]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Forecasting Americans' Long-Term Adoption of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2016 .

[9]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Analysis of Private Drivers’ Commuting and Commercial Drivers’ Work-Related Travel Behavior , 1998 .

[10]  Gang-Len Chang,et al.  Understanding suburban commuting characteristics: an empirical study in suburban Dallas , 1992 .

[11]  Nikhil Menon,et al.  Consumer Perception and Intended Adoption of Autonomous-Vehicle Technology: Findings from a University Population Survey , 2016 .

[12]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data , 2016 .

[13]  Simon Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2010 .

[14]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2004, Technometrics.

[15]  Parvathy Vinod Sheela,et al.  The effect of information on changing opinions toward autonomous vehicle adoption: An exploratory analysis , 2019, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation.

[16]  Srinivas Peeta,et al.  Rail-truck multimodal freight collaboration: a statistical analysis of freight-shipper perspectives , 2016 .

[17]  C. Bhat Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences , 2003 .

[18]  J. Halton On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals , 1960 .

[19]  Yao Wang,et al.  A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment , 2001, KDD '01.

[20]  Michael R. Anderberg,et al.  Cluster Analysis for Applications , 1973 .

[21]  F. Mannering,et al.  A DYNAMIC EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND UTILIZATION , 1985 .

[22]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles , 2017 .

[23]  A. Mohammadian,et al.  Modeling adoption timing of autonomous vehicles: innovation diffusion approach , 2018, Transportation.

[24]  Geoffrey A. Moore Crossing the chasm : marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers , 1999 .

[25]  F. Mannering,et al.  Determinants of bicyclist injury severities in bicycle-vehicle crashes: A random parameters approach with heterogeneity in means and variances , 2017 .

[26]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  An empirical assessment of the effects of economic recessions on pedestrian-injury crashes using mixed and latent-class models , 2016 .

[27]  Steve W. Edison,et al.  Measuring attitudes towards general technology: Antecedents, hypotheses and scale development , 2003 .

[28]  Sabyasachee Mishra,et al.  Predicting the adoption of connected autonomous vehicles: A new approach based on the theory of diffusion of innovations , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[29]  Reid R. Heffner,et al.  Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .