Gricean Expectations in Online Sentence Comprehension: An ERP Study on the Processing of Scalar Inferences
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Baron-Cohen,et al. The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Malesand Females, Scientists and Mathematicians , 2001, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.
[2] Xiaoming Jiang,et al. Distinct neural correlates for pragmatic and semantic meaning processing: An event-related potential investigation of scalar implicature processing using picture-sentence verification , 2013, Brain Research.
[3] Utako Minai,et al. Pragmatic inferences modulate N400 during sentence comprehension: Evidence from picture–sentence verification , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.
[4] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Processing Scalar Implicature: A Constraint-Based Approach , 2015, Cogn. Sci..
[5] Markus Werning,et al. The Interaction of Bayesian Pragmatics and Lexical Semantics in Linguistic Interpretation: Using Event-related Potentials to Investigate Hearers' Probabilistic Predictions , 2017, CogSci.
[6] P. Hagoort. The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[7] Nathaniel J. Smith,et al. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic , 2013, Cognition.
[8] Xiaolin Zhou,et al. Neural correlates of fine‐grained meaning distinctions: An fMRI investigation of scalar quantifiers , 2017, Human brain mapping.
[9] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.
[10] Bob van Tiel,et al. Quantity matters: implicatures, typicality, and truth , 2009 .
[11] Natalie M. Klein,et al. “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment , 2010, Cognition.
[12] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials , 2016 .
[13] Petra B. Schumacher,et al. Definiteness Marking Shows Late Effects during Discourse Processing: Evidence from ERPs , 2009, DAARC.
[14] C. Van Petten,et al. Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[15] I. Noveck,et al. Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study , 2003, Brain and Language.
[16] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.
[17] Katherine A. DeLong,et al. Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.
[18] Marta Kutas,et al. Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.
[19] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Quantification, Prediction, and the Online Impact of Sentence Truth-Value: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[20] Feiyan Chen,et al. Are scalar implicatures automatically processed and different for each individual? A mismatch negativity (MMN) study , 2015, Brain Research.
[21] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[22] Andrea E. Martin,et al. Why the A/AN prediction effect may be hard to replicate: a rebuttal to Delong, Urbach, and Kutas (2017) , 2017 .
[23] M. Kutas,et al. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.
[24] Michael Franke,et al. Probabilistic pragmatics, or why Bayes’ rule is probably important for pragmatics , 2016 .
[25] Marta Kutas,et al. Is there a replication crisis? Perhaps. Is this an example? No: a commentary on Ito, Martin, and Nieuwland (2016) , 2017 .
[26] Yi Ting Huang,et al. Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[27] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Incremental comprehension of spoken quantifier sentences: Evidence from brain potentials , 2016, Brain Research.
[28] Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al. Are all the triangles blue? – ERP evidence for the incremental processing of German quantifier restriction* , 2016, Language and Cognition.
[29] John M. Tomlinson,et al. Possibly All of that and Then Some: Scalar Implicatures Are Understood in Two Steps. , 2013 .
[30] Siobhan Chapman. Logic and Conversation , 2005 .
[31] Michael C. Frank,et al. Review Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference , 2022 .
[32] Gina R. Kuperberg,et al. Prediction (or not) during language processing. A commentary on Nieuwland et al. (2017) and DeLong et al. (2005) , 2017, bioRxiv.
[33] H. Huynh,et al. Conditions under Which Mean Square Ratios in Repeated Measurements Designs Have Exact F-Distributions , 1970 .
[34] G. Thierry,et al. Some Alternatives? Event-Related Potential Investigation of Literal and Pragmatic Interpretations of Some Presented in Isolation , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[35] Susana Ruiz Fernández,et al. Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[36] Katherine A. DeLong,et al. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[37] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[38] Jarmo Kontinen,et al. Investigating scalar implicatures in a truth-value judgement task: evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2016 .
[39] R. Ulrich,et al. Incremental generation of answers during the comprehension of questions with quantifiers , 2017, Cognition.
[40] Albert Kim,et al. The neural computation of scalar implicature , 2015, CogSci.
[41] Marianna D. Eddy,et al. Processing temporal presuppositions: an event-related potential study , 2016 .
[42] Herbert Schriefers,et al. The N400 as an index of lexical preactivation and its implications for prediction in language comprehension , 2018 .
[43] 木村 和夫. Pragmatics , 1997, Language Teaching.
[44] Lewis Bott,et al. Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences , 2004 .
[45] Stephen Politzer-Ahles,et al. Involvement of prefrontal cortex in scalar implicatures: evidence from magnetoencephalography , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.
[46] M. Schlesewsky,et al. The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned , 2014, Brain and Language.
[47] E. Donchin,et al. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.