Emergent elasticity in the neural code for space

Significance We develop a theoretical model, grounded in known properties of neural dynamics and synaptic plasticity, that can fuse information gathered from the past history of velocity and sequence of encountered landmarks during exploratory behavior, to construct a self-consistent internal representation of space. Moreover, through model reduction techniques, we obtain conceptual insights into how consistent internal spatial representations naturally emerge through an elastic relaxation process in an effective spring–particle system. We verify several experimentally testable predictions of our model involving the spatial behavior of grid cells in the medial entorhinal cortex, as well as suggest additional experiments. Upon encountering a novel environment, an animal must construct a consistent environmental map, as well as an internal estimate of its position within that map, by combining information from two distinct sources: self-motion cues and sensory landmark cues. How do known aspects of neural circuit dynamics and synaptic plasticity conspire to accomplish this feat? Here we show analytically how a neural attractor model that combines path integration of self-motion cues with Hebbian plasticity in synaptic weights from landmark cells can self-organize a consistent map of space as the animal explores an environment. Intriguingly, the emergence of this map can be understood as an elastic relaxation process between landmark cells mediated by the attractor network. Moreover, our model makes several experimentally testable predictions, including (i) systematic path-dependent shifts in the firing fields of grid cells toward the most recently encountered landmark, even in a fully learned environment; (ii) systematic deformations in the firing fields of grid cells in irregular environments, akin to elastic deformations of solids forced into irregular containers; and (iii) the creation of topological defects in grid cell firing patterns through specific environmental manipulations. Taken together, our results conceptually link known aspects of neurons and synapses to an emergent solution of a fundamental computational problem in navigation, while providing a unified account of disparate experimental observations.

[1]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Environmental deformations dynamically shift the grid cell spatial metric , 2017 .

[2]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  A Multiplexed, Heterogeneous, and Adaptive Code for Navigation in Medial Entorhinal Cortex , 2017, Neuron.

[3]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Grid Cells Form a Global Representation of Connected Environments , 2015, Current Biology.

[4]  Edvard I. Moser,et al.  Speed cells in the medial entorhinal cortex , 2015, Nature.

[5]  Julija Krupic Brain crystals , 2015, Science.

[6]  Jeremiah Y. Cohen Dopamine and serotonin signals for reward across time scales , 2015, Science.

[7]  John O'Keefe,et al.  Local transformations of the hippocampal cognitive map , 2018, Science.

[8]  Yoram Burakyy,et al.  Accurate Path Integration in Continuous Attractor Network Models of Grid Cells , 2009 .

[9]  Edvard I. Moser,et al.  Shearing-induced asymmetry in entorhinal grid cells , 2015, Nature.

[10]  Thomas J. Wills,et al.  Absence of Visual Input Results in the Disruption of Grid Cell Firing in the Mouse , 2016, Current Biology.

[11]  Neil Burgess,et al.  How environment and self‐motion combine in neural representations of space , 2016, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Xue-Xin Wei,et al.  Dynamic self-organized error-correction of grid cells by border cells , 2018, bioRxiv.

[13]  A. Treves,et al.  Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex , 2007, Nature.

[14]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Environmental Boundaries as an Error Correction Mechanism for Grid Cells , 2015, Neuron.

[15]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: A Molecular Model for Robust Precise Adaptation , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Jörg Conradt,et al.  Hebbian Plasticity Realigns Grid Cell Activity with External Sensory Cues in Continuous Attractor Models , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[17]  Michael E Hasselmo,et al.  Modelling effects on grid cells of sensory input during self‐motion , 2016, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  M. Moser,et al.  Representation of Geometric Borders in the Entorhinal Cortex , 2008, Science.

[19]  T. Hafting,et al.  Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex , 2005, Nature.

[20]  T. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Grid cells and cortical representation , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Gordon Wyeth,et al.  RatSLAM: a hippocampal model for simultaneous localization and mapping , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[22]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Grid cell firing patterns signal environmental novelty by expansion , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  K M Gothard,et al.  Dynamics of Mismatch Correction in the Hippocampal Ensemble Code for Space: Interaction between Path Integration and Environmental Cues , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping in a Continuous Attractor Neural Network Model , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map' , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  How environment geometry affects grid cell symmetry and what we can learn from it , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Torkel Hafting,et al.  Conjunctive Representation of Position, Direction, and Velocity in Entorhinal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[28]  Caswell Barry,et al.  Grid cell symmetry is shaped by environmental geometry , 2015, Nature.

[29]  Lisa M Giocomo,et al.  Environmental boundaries as a mechanism for correcting and anchoring spatial maps , 2016, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Probabilistic robotics , 2002, CACM.

[32]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Principles governing the integration of landmark and self-motion cues in entorhinal cortical codes for navigation , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  John O'Keefe,et al.  Framing the grid: effect of boundaries on grid cells and navigation , 2016, The Journal of physiology.