Validation methods for population models of gene expression dynamics

The advent of experimental techniques for the time-course monitoring of gene expression at the single-cell level has paved the way to the model-based study of gene expression variability within- and across-cells. A number of approaches to the inference of models accounting for variability of gene expression over isogenic cell populations have been developed and applied to real-world scenarios. The development of a systematic approach for the validation of population models is however lagging behind, and accuracy of the models obtained is often assessed on a semi-empirical basis. In this paper we study the problem of validation of models of gene network dynamics for cell populations, providing statistical tools for qualitative and quantitative model validation and comparison, and guidelines for their application and interpretation based on a real biological case study.

[1]  David B. Searls A View from the Dark Side , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  É. Moulines,et al.  Convergence of a stochastic approximation version of the EM algorithm , 1999 .

[3]  F. Fages,et al.  Long-term model predictive control of gene expression at the population and single-cell levels , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  M. Peter,et al.  Scalable inference of heterogeneous reaction kinetics from pooled single-cell recordings , 2013, Nature Methods.

[5]  D. Bernardo,et al.  A Yeast Synthetic Network for In Vivo Assessment of Reverse-Engineering and Modeling Approaches , 2009, Cell.

[6]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[7]  M. Khammash,et al.  Systematic Identification of Signal-Activated Stochastic Gene Regulation , 2013, Science.

[8]  D. Gillespie A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation , 1992 .

[9]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  L. H. Miller Table of Percentage Points of Kolmogorov Statistics , 1956 .

[11]  Guido Sanguinetti,et al.  Comparison of different moment-closure approximations for stochastic chemical kinetics. , 2015, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  J. Lygeros,et al.  Moment-based inference predicts bimodality in transient gene expression , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Eugenio Cinquemani,et al.  What Population Reveals about Individual Cell Identity: Single-Cell Parameter Estimation of Models of Gene Expression in Yeast , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  Emmanuelle Comets,et al.  Model evaluation in nonlinear mixed effect models, with applications to pharmacokinetics , 2010 .

[15]  Brian Munsky,et al.  Listening to the noise: random fluctuations reveal gene network parameters , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[16]  Robert J. Bauer,et al.  A survey of population analysis methods and software for complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models with examples , 2007, The AAPS Journal.

[17]  Toru Yanagawa,et al.  Measuring Integrated Information from the Decoding Perspective , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Eugenio Cinquemani,et al.  Identification of biological models from single-cell data: A comparison between mixed-effects and moment-based inference , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[19]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Stochastic modelling of gene regulatory networks , 2005 .