Swarming transitions in hierarchical societies.

Social hierarchy is central to decision-making in the coordinated movement of many swarming species. Here we propose a hierarchical swarm model in the spirit of the Vicsek model of self-propelled particles. We show that, as the hierarchy becomes important, the swarming transition changes from the weak first-order transition observed for egalitarian populations, to a stronger first-order transition for intermediately strong hierarchies, and finally the discontinuity reduces till vanish, where the order-disorder transition appears to be absent in the extremely despotic societies. Associated to this we observe that the spatial structure of the swarm, as measured by the correlation between the density and velocity fields, is strongly mediated by the hierarchy. A two-group model and vectorial noise are also studied for verification. Our results point out the particular relevance of the hierarchical structures to swarming transitions when doing specific case studies.

[1]  H Larralde,et al.  Phase transitions in systems of self-propelled agents and related network models. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[2]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Democracy in animals: the evolution of shared group decisions , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Identifying influential neighbors in animal flocking , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  H. Chaté,et al.  Onset of collective and cohesive motion. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[5]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  T. Ihle Kinetic theory of flocking: derivation of hydrodynamic equations. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  E. Bertin,et al.  Boltzmann and hydrodynamic description for self-propelled particles. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  T. Seeley,et al.  Honeybee Ecology: A Study of Adaptation in Social Life , 1985 .

[9]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[10]  O. Petit,et al.  Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques? , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  Romualdo Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Effects of Heterogeneous Social Interactions on Flocking Dynamics. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[12]  I. Couzin,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015, Science.

[13]  Yilin Wu,et al.  Weak synchronization and large-scale collective oscillation in dense bacterial suspensions , 2017, Nature.

[14]  H. Chaté,et al.  Modeling collective motion: variations on the Vicsek model , 2008 .

[15]  Michel Droz,et al.  Hydrodynamic equations for self-propelled particles: microscopic derivation and stability analysis , 2009, 0907.4688.

[16]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[17]  Gerd Zschaler,et al.  Adaptive-network models of swarm dynamics , 2010, 1009.2349.

[18]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[19]  Maximino Aldana,et al.  Phase Transitions in Self-Driven Many-Particle Systems and Related Non-Equilibrium Models: A Network Approach , 2003 .

[20]  S. Ramaswamy,et al.  Hydrodynamics of soft active matter , 2013 .

[21]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  From local collective behavior to global migratory patterns in white storks , 2018, Science.

[22]  G. Baglietto,et al.  Gregarious versus individualistic behavior in Vicsek swarms and the onset of first-order phase transitions , 2013, 1303.6315.

[23]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Adaptive network models of collective decision making in swarming systems. , 2015, Physical review. E.

[24]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[25]  L. Mech,et al.  Leadership behavior in relation to dominance and reproductive status in gray wolves, Canis lupus , 2002 .

[26]  S. Durant,et al.  Matriarchs As Repositories of Social Knowledge in African Elephants , 2001, Science.

[27]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Dominance and Affiliation Mediate Despotism in a Social Primate , 2008, Current Biology.

[28]  G. Ariel,et al.  Heterogeneous populations in a network model of collective motion , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[29]  H. Chaté,et al.  Collective motion of self-propelled particles interacting without cohesion. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.