EVALUATION OF LOAD TRANSFER IN THE CELLULOSIC-FIBER/ POLYMER INTERPHASE USING A MICRO-RAMAN TENSILE TEST*

The objectives of this research were (1) to use a Raman micro-spectroscopic technique to determine the tensile stress distributions of a cellulosic-fiber/polymer droplet interphase, and (2) to examine if the stress profile could be used to evaluate load transfer in fiber/polymer adhesion. Cellulosic fibers were treated with various silanes (amino, phenylamino, phenyl, and octadecyl functionalities) and a styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer to create different interphases upon bonding with polystyrene. A single fiber, bonded with a micro-droplet of polystyrene in the mid-span region of its gage length, was strained in tension. Raman spectra were collected at five-micrometer intervals along the embedded region of the fiber. The stress-dependent peak of cellulose (895 cm -1 ) was analyzed for frequency shift so that the local tensile stress in the interface region could be determined. Results showed that the local tensile stresses of the strained fiber were lower in the embedded region compared to the exposed region, suggesting a transfer of load from the fiber to the matrix polymer. A deeper and sharper decline of the stress profile was observed when the fiber/droplet interaction was enhanced. Further analyses, involving conversion of tensile stress profiles to shear stress distributions in the interphase, confirmed that the micro-Raman/tensile test can be employed to evaluate fiber/matrix interfacial bonding in composites. This success signifies the possibility of evaluating adhesion between cellulosic fibers and brittle polymers, which is difficult to study using common micromechanical tests. Use of the micro-Raman technique can improve our understanding of wood/polymer adhesion.

[1]  Stephen J. Eichhorn,et al.  Composite micromechanics of hemp fibres and epoxy resin microdroplets , 2004 .

[2]  S. Eichhorn,et al.  Deformation micromechanics of natural cellulose fibre networks and composites , 2003 .

[3]  W. T. Tze Effects of Fiberimatiux Interactions on the Interfacial Deformation Micromechanics of Cellulose-Fiberipolymer Composites , 2003 .

[4]  K. Seavey,et al.  Continuous cellulose fiber-reinforced cellulose ester composites III. Commercial matrix and fiber options , 2001 .

[5]  Stephen J. Eichhorn,et al.  Deformation Processes in Regenerated Cellulose Fibers , 2001 .

[6]  S. Eichhorn,et al.  Strain induced shifts in the Raman spectra of natural cellulose fibers , 2000 .

[7]  A. Gandini,et al.  Interfacial Properties of Regenerated Cellulose Fiber/Polystyrene Composite Materials. Effect of the Coupling Agent's Structure on the Micromechanical Behavior , 2000 .

[8]  M. Defosse Processors focus on differentiation in window profiles , 1999 .

[9]  R. Young,et al.  Deformation Micromechanics in Model Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites Part II: The Microbond Test , 1997 .

[10]  J. Karger‐Kocsis,et al.  Surface energetics of carbon fibers and its effects on the mechanical performance of CF/EP composites , 1996 .

[11]  Leslie H. Groom,et al.  A technique to measure strain distributions in single wood pulp fibers , 1996 .

[12]  R. Young,et al.  Deformation micromechanics in model carbon fibre-reinforced composites , 1995, Journal of Materials Science.

[13]  Lawrence T. Drzal,et al.  Comparison of methods for the measurement of fibre/matrix adhesion in composites , 1992 .

[14]  D. Waldman,et al.  INTERFACIAL EFFECTS ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN MODEL COMPOSITES , 1991 .

[15]  B. Miller,et al.  Microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber/resin interface: Evaluation of experimental parameters , 1989 .