Statistical Considerations in the Creation of Realistic Synthetic Power Grids for Geomagnetic Disturbance Studies

Studies to evaluate the power system impacts of geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) can benefit from geographically realistic public test cases to validate methodologies and analysis tools. Presently very few GMD test cases exist that are not restricted by data confidentiality. In this paper, we outline a method to generate completely synthetic transmission system networks suitable for GMD studies. Public energy and census data form the basis for generation, load, and geographic substation placement. The transmission line topology of the synthetic network is designed to match statistical characteristics observed on the Eastern Interconnect in North America: average nodal degree, average shortest path length, and average clustering coefficient. We apply the Delaunay triangulation to transmission network synthesis, showing it provides an excellent starting place for generating realistic topologies. A 150-bus case is developed and released with benchmark GMD results, for using in testing GMD models and methods.

[1]  Risto Pirjola,et al.  Properties of matrices included in the calculation of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in power systems and introduction of a test model for GIC computation algorithms , 2009 .

[2]  T. J. Overbye,et al.  Integration of geomagnetic disturbance modeling into the power flow: A methodology for large-scale system studies , 2012, 2012 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[3]  Michael Ian Shamos,et al.  Computational geometry: an introduction , 1985 .

[4]  Seth Blumsack,et al.  Comparing the Topological and Electrical Structure of the North American Electric Power Infrastructure , 2011, IEEE Systems Journal.

[5]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[6]  T. J. Overbye,et al.  A Test Case for the Calculation of Geomagnetically Induced Currents , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[7]  Seth Blumsack,et al.  The Topological and Electrical Structure of Power Grids , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Generating Statistically Correct Random Topologies for Testing Smart Grid Communication and Control Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  On Bus Type Assignments in Random Topology Power Grid Models , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Thomas J. Overbye,et al.  Parametric steady-state voltage stability assessment of power systems using benchmark scenarios of geomagnetic disturbances , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI).

[11]  V. Voloshin.  Introduction to Graph and Hypergraph Theory , 2013 .

[12]  Marco Aiello,et al.  The Power Grid as a Complex Network: a Survey , 2011, ArXiv.

[13]  L. Infante,et al.  Hierarchical Clustering , 2020, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[14]  Thomas J. Overbye,et al.  A methodology for the creation of geographically realistic synthetic power flow models , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI).

[15]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[16]  D. West.  Introduction to Graph Theory , 1995 .

[17]  Thomas J. Overbye,et al.  Geomagnetically induced current sensitivity to assumed substation grounding resistance , 2013, 2013 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[18]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[19]  Réka Albert,et al.  Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.