Decomposition of LiDAR waveforms with negative tails by Gaussian mixture model

Abstract. Waveform decomposition techniques are commonly used to extract attributes of targets from light detection and ranging (LiDAR) waveforms. The conventional Gaussian decomposition (GD) cannot deal with system waveforms (SWs) with non-Gaussian shapes, whereas the recently proposed B-spline-based decomposition method holds an assumption of similarity transformation. We present a multi-Gaussian decomposition (MGD) algorithm that employs a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to represent the SW. Compared with the GD algorithm, the MGD algorithm exploits the characteristic of the SW using the GMM and hence can fit the received waveforms better than the GD algorithm. In contrast to the B-spline-based method, the proposed algorithm holds a more reasonable assumption that a received waveform is a convolution result of the SW with the target response, which accords with the ranging principle better. The MGD algorithm was validated using the experimental waveforms with negative tails collected by our self-designed LiDAR system. The GD algorithm and the B-spline-based decomposition were also introduced and studied for comparison. The experimental results show that the GMM with six components fit the SW with an acceptable residual. The experimental results also show that the MGD algorithm produced better decomposition results than the other two algorithms in terms of range retrieval, whereas the B-spline-based decomposition showed the best performance with regards to the root-mean-square-error for waveform fitting.

[1]  Claudia Künzer,et al.  Regularizing method for the determination of the backscatter cross section in lidar data. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  Hanyun Wang,et al.  Iterative Tensor Voting for Pavement Crack Extraction Using Mobile Laser Scanning Data , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Zheng Niu,et al.  Height Extraction of Maize Using Airborne Full-Waveform LIDAR Data and a Deconvolution Algorithm , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  Michael A. Lefsky,et al.  Modeling canopy height in a savanna ecosystem using spaceborne lidar waveforms , 2014 .

[5]  M. Pfennigbauer,et al.  Design and evaluation of a full-wave surface and bottom-detection algorithm for LiDAR bathymetry of very shallow waters , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  B-spline deconvolution for differential target cross-section determination in full-waveform laser scanning data , 2011 .

[7]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  A New TwIST: Two-Step Iterative Shrinkage/Thresholding Algorithms for Image Restoration , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Craig L. Glennie,et al.  Empirical Waveform Decomposition and Radiometric Calibration of a Terrestrial Full-Waveform Laser Scanner , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Qingquan Li,et al.  Decomposition of LiDAR waveforms by B-spline-based modeling , 2017 .

[10]  Yi-Hsing Tseng,et al.  A Wavelet-Based Echo Detector for Waveform LiDAR Data , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Robert Nowak,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Full-Waveform Lidar Algorithms , 2011 .

[12]  Uwe Stilla,et al.  Range determination with waveform recording laser systems using a Wiener Filter , 2006 .

[13]  Peng Liu,et al.  A comparison of waveform processing algorithms for single-wavelength LiDAR bathymetry , 2015 .

[14]  Mohsen Azadbakht,et al.  A Sparsity-Based Regularization Approach for Deconvolution of Full-Waveform Airborne Lidar Data , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[16]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Xiaojuan Li,et al.  Sub-footprint analysis to uncover tree height variation using ICESat/GLAS , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[18]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[19]  Q. Guo,et al.  Simple method for direct crown base height estimation of individual conifer trees using airborne LiDAR data. , 2018, Optics express.

[20]  C. Mallet,et al.  Processing full-waveform lidar data: Modelling raw signals , 2015 .

[21]  Frédéric Bretar,et al.  Full-waveform topographic lidar : State-of-the-art , 2009 .

[22]  Feng Ling,et al.  An Iterative Interpolation Deconvolution Algorithm for Superresolution Land Cover Mapping , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Giorgos Mountrakis,et al.  A linearly approximated iterative Gaussian decomposition method for waveform LiDAR processing , 2017 .

[24]  Sorin C. Popescu,et al.  Gold – A novel deconvolution algorithm with optimization for waveform LiDAR processing , 2017 .

[25]  Gregory Asner,et al.  A Comparison of Signal Deconvolution Algorithms Based on Small-Footprint LiDAR Waveform Simulation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.