Audioconference participants often have difficulty identifying the voices of other conferees, especially in ad hoc groups of unfamiliar members. Simultaneous presentation of multiple voices through a single, monaural channel can be discordant and difficult to comprehend. To address these shortcomings, we have developed the Vocal Village, a communications tool that allows for real-time spatialized audioconferencing across the Internet. The Vocal Village system uses binaural audio signals to present the voices of individual conference participants from different apparent positions in space by adding location cues to audio information.This paper describes our experimental research to determine whether the real-time, "within the head," spatialization cues implemented by Vocal Village are sufficient to provide performance benefits compared to traditional, monaural audio-conferencing methods. Performance benefits included memory, speaker identification, and participant preference. We also investigated whether providing users with the ability to control the location of conference participants within a virtual auditory space further enhanced any such benefits.The "within the head" spatialization used in this experiment did not lead to a statistically significant increase in the ability to remember who said what in an audioconference. However, there was a borderline significant increase in remembering who said what when participants were given the opportunity to move the voices of two similar sounding conferees into different apparent locations. Participants also significantly preferred spatialized audio formats over the mono audio format. Spatialization had a significant effect on improving participants' perceived confidence in their memory of conferee viewpoints. Additionally, spatialization significantly reduced both the perceived difficulty of identifying speakers during conferences, as well as the amount of attention perceived to be dedicated to performing such voice identification. Providing subjects with the ability to control the apparent location of conference participants resulted in the greatest benefit to both of these measures.
[1]
Claudia Rawlins,et al.
The Impact of Teleconferencing on the Leadership of Small Decision-Making Groups
,
1990
.
[2]
S. Weisband.
Maintaining Awareness in Distributed Team Collaboration: Implications for Leadership and Performance
,
2002
.
[3]
Jacques Vallee,et al.
Electronic Meetings: Technical Alternatives
,
1979
.
[4]
Janet Fulk,et al.
Wired Meetings: Technological Mediation of Organizational Gatherings
,
2001
.
[5]
Robert E. Kraut,et al.
--Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work
,
2001
.
[6]
Jessica J. Baldis.
Effects of spatial audio on memory, comprehension, and preference during desktop conferences
,
2001,
CHI.
[7]
James R. Rhyne,et al.
Tools for supporting the collaborative process
,
1992,
UIST '92.
[8]
T. Anderson,et al.
Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments
,
1997
.
[9]
R. Johansen,et al.
Electronic meetings : technical alternatives and social choices
,
1979
.
[10]
John Short,et al.
The social psychology of telecommunications
,
1976
.
[11]
Susan R. Fussell.
Social and Cognitive Processes in Interpersonal Communication: Implications for Advanced Telecommunications Technologies
,
1995,
Hum. Factors.
[12]
Kevin Mills,et al.
Introduction to the electronic symposium on computer-supported cooperative work
,
1999,
CSUR.
[13]
Jonathan Caruso David Tudge,et al.
Cooperative Problem-Solving in the Classroom.
,
1989
.