A new Transcriptional Effect Level Index (TELI) for toxicogenomics-based toxicity assessment.

This study proposes and demonstrates the potential application of a new Transcriptional Effect Level Index (TELI) to convert the information-rich toxicogenomic data into integrated and quantitative endpoints. A library of transcriptional fusions of green fluorescent protein (GFP) that includes different promoters for 91 stress-related genes in E. coli K12, MG1655 is employed to evaluate the gene expression alteration induced by exposure to four nanomaterials (NMs), nano silver (nAg), nano titanium dioxide anatase (nTiO₂_a), nano titanium dioxide rutile (nTiO₂_r), and fullerene soot. TELI is determined for each toxicogenomic assay, and it incorporates the number and identity of genes that had altered expression, the magnitude of alteration, and the temporal pattern of gene expression change in response to toxicant exposure. TELI values exhibit a characteristic "sigmoid" shaped toxicity dose-response curve, based on which TELI(MAX) (the maximal value of TELI), TELI50 (concentration that yields half of TELI(MAX)), NOTEL(TELI) (TELI-based no observed transcriptional effect level), and Slope(TELI) (the slope of TELI-dose response curve) are obtained. TELI-based endpoints are compared to currently used endpoints such as EC50 and no observed transcriptional effect level (NOTEL). The agreement of NOTEL(TELI) and NOTEL values validates the concept and application of TELI. Multiple endpoints derived from TELI can describe the dose response behavior and characteristics more completely and holistically than single points such as NOTEL alone. TELI values determined for genes in each stress response category (e.g., oxidative stress, DNA repair) indicate mode of action (MOA)-related comparative transcriptional level toxicity among compounds, and it reveals detailed information of toxic response pathways such as different DNA damage and repair mechanisms among the NMs. This study presents a methodology for converting the rich toxicogenomic information into a readily usable and transferable format that can be potentially linked to regulation endpoints and incorporated into a decision-making framework.

[1]  John J. Schlager,et al.  Toxicity Evaluation for Safe Use of Nanomaterials: Recent Achievements and Technical Challenges , 2009 .

[2]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis: From Elementary to Intermediate , 1999 .

[3]  H. Hirt,et al.  Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. , 2004, Annual review of plant biology.

[4]  Xiangqin Cui,et al.  Exploration of low-dose estrogen effects: identification of No Observed Transcriptional Effect Level (NOTEL). , 2004, Toxicologic pathology.

[5]  G. Pöch,et al.  Calculating slope and ED50 of additive dose-response curves, and application of these tabulated parameter values. , 1995, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[6]  Thomas H Hutchinson,et al.  Ecotoxicogenomics: the challenge of integrating genomics into aquatic and terrestrial ecotoxicology. , 2004, Aquatic toxicology.

[7]  Melinda Miller Holt,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis From Elementary to Intermediate , 2001, Technometrics.

[8]  R. L. Jones,et al.  Unique cellular interaction of silver nanoparticles: size-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[9]  U. Alon,et al.  Assigning numbers to the arrows: Parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Mark R Wiesner,et al.  Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. , 2006, Nano letters.

[11]  H. A I F E N G W E N G, ‡ M I A O H E, § S O N J A H Prokaryotic Real-Time Gene Expression Profiling for Toxicity Assessment , 2009 .

[12]  T. Ternes,et al.  Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change? , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  A. Soto,et al.  Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  Edward J Perkins,et al.  Gene expression profiling in Daphnia magna, part II: validation of a copper specific gene expression signature with effluent from two copper mines in California. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  The utility of DNA microarrays for characterizing genotoxicity. , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  Tung-Sheng Shih,et al.  The apoptotic effect of nanosilver is mediated by a ROS- and JNK-dependent mechanism involving the mitochondrial pathway in NIH3T3 cells. , 2008, Toxicology letters.

[17]  T. Webb,et al.  Pulmonary toxicity study in rats with three forms of ultrafine-TiO2 particles: differential responses related to surface properties. , 2007, Toxicology.

[18]  Wenxuan Zhong,et al.  A data-driven clustering method for time course gene expression data , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  D. Paustenbach,et al.  The European Union’s REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements , 2009, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[20]  H. Lindberg,et al.  Genotoxic effects of nanosized and fine TiO2 , 2009, Human & experimental toxicology.

[21]  Dhimiter Bello,et al.  Nanomaterials properties vs. biological oxidative damage: Implications for toxicity screening and exposure assessment , 2009 .

[22]  T. Yamanaka,et al.  The TAO-Gen Algorithm for Identifying Gene Interaction Networks with Application to SOS Repair in E. coli , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  A. Soto,et al.  Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans , 1994 .

[24]  Gerald T Ankley,et al.  Toxicogenomics in regulatory ecotoxicology. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  R. Young,et al.  DOSE RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS FOR ACUTE IONIZING-RADIATION LETHALITY , 2003, Health physics.

[26]  M. Hande,et al.  Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells. , 2009, ACS nano.

[27]  Uri Alon,et al.  Invariant Distribution of Promoter Activities in Escherichia coli , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  EcoCyc: A comprehensive view of Escherichia coli biology , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[30]  U. Alon,et al.  A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli , 2006, Nature Methods.

[31]  Jac A. Nickoloff,et al.  DNA repair in prokaryotes and lower eukaryotes , 1998 .

[32]  E. Perkins,et al.  Gene expression profiling in Daphnia magna part I: concentration-dependent profiles provide support for the No Observed Transcriptional Effect Level. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Charles W. Schmidt,et al.  TOX 21: New Dimensions of Toxicity Testing , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  S. Okabe,et al.  Classification of heavy-metal toxicity by human DNA microarray analysis. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  S-H A Y D E N Mechanistic Toxicity Assessment of Nanomaterials by Whole-Cell-Array Stress Genes Expression Analysis , 2010 .

[36]  M. Cox,et al.  recA protein-promoted ATP hydrolysis occurs throughout recA nucleoprotein filaments. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.