Developing a novel fuzzy neutrosophic numbers based decision making analysis for prioritizing the energy storage technologies

Abstract The energy storage plays a fundamental role for sustainable energy systems and potential future economy. The aim of this study is to evaluate and prioritize the energy storage technology alternatives (methods) considering technical, cost, and environmental and social criteria. We propose a hybrid trapezoidal neutrosophic fuzzy numbers based Dombi weighted geometric averaging operator and MultiAtributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) model. A case study in Romania is carried out to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed model. It is also compared with some existing methods to verify the superiority of the proposed model. Six technical storage methods are examined as follows: A1: Hydro-pumping (HP), A2: Hydrogen Underground Storage (HU), A3: Hydrogen “on ground” multiple storage solution (HM), A4: Hybrid 1 (HP + HU), A5: Hybrid 2 (HP + HM), and A6: Hybrid 3 (HU + HM). The results show that the alternative A4: hydro-pumping and hydrogen underground storage method is the best among all alternatives.

[1]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  A Neutrosophic Extension of the MULTIMOORA Method , 2017, Informatica.

[2]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its applications in multiple attribute decision‐making , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[3]  A. Walters,et al.  Technical and environmental aspects of underground hydrogen storage , 1976 .

[4]  Jun Ye,et al.  Trapezoidal neutrosophic set and its application to multiple attribute decision-making , 2014, Neural Computing and Applications.

[5]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Location Selection for Wind Farms Using GIS Multi-Criteria Hybrid Model: An Approach Based on Fuzzy and Rough Numbers , 2017 .

[6]  Hüseyin Basligil,et al.  A Hybrid Multicriteria Decision Making Methodology Based on Type-2 Fuzzy Sets For Selection Among Energy Storage Alternatives , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[7]  İbrahim Zeki Akyurt,et al.  An integrated ARAS and interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets method for underground site selection: Seasonal hydrogen storage in salt caverns , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[8]  Samarjit Kar,et al.  An Approach to Rank Picture Fuzzy Numbers for Decision Making Problems , 2019, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[9]  V. Annapoorani,et al.  Application of normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy sets to site selection for hydrogen underground storage , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[10]  Aleksandar Petrović,et al.  Application of the AHP-VIKOR hybrid model in media selection for informing of endangered in emergency situations , 2019 .

[11]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems ith simplified neutrosophic sets uan - , 2014 .

[12]  Florentin Smarandache,et al.  Neutrosophic set - a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set , 2004, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing.

[13]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Some intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making , 2018, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Yongquan Zhou,et al.  Multi-criteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[15]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots , 2016 .

[16]  Jun Ye,et al.  Dombi Aggregation Operators of Linguistic Cubic Variables for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2018, Inf..

[17]  Lincoln Paterson,et al.  Physical, chemical and energy aspects of underground hydrogen storage , 1979 .

[18]  Jun Ye,et al.  Cosine Measures of Linguistic Neutrosophic Numbers and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making , 2017, Inf..

[19]  Xiaorong He,et al.  Typhoon disaster assessment based on Dombi hesitant fuzzy information aggregation operators , 2018, Natural Hazards.

[20]  Jack Brouwer,et al.  Impact of hydrogen energy storage on California electric power system: Towards 100% renewable electricity , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[21]  József Dombi,et al.  The Generalized Dombi Operator Family and the Multiplicative Utility Function , 2009 .

[22]  Ridvan Sahin,et al.  A Multi-criteria neutrosophic group decision making metod based TOPSIS for supplier selection , 2014, ArXiv.

[23]  J. B. Taylor,et al.  Technical and economic assessment of methods for the storage of large quantities of hydrogen , 1986 .

[24]  Karel Bouzek,et al.  The hydrogen context and vulnerabilities in the central and Eastern European countries , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[25]  Manik Chandra Das,et al.  MCDM technique application to the selection of an Indian institute of technology , 2019 .

[26]  Aaron W Thornton,et al.  Hydrogen Storage Materials for Mobile and Stationary Applications: Current State of the Art. , 2015, ChemSusChem.

[27]  Lili Zhang,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making method based on neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy Heronian mean aggregation operators , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[28]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Bipolar fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its application in multiple-attribute decision-making process , 2018, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[29]  Soumava Boral,et al.  An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA , 2020, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[30]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  Some single-valued neutrosophic dombi prioritized weighted aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[31]  Zhang-peng Tian,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making method based on a cross-entropy with interval neutrosophic sets , 2015, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[32]  Muhammet Deveci,et al.  Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland , 2020 .

[33]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre , 2018 .

[34]  Li-hua Yang,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach with Multivalued Neutrosophic Linguistic Normalized Weighted Bonferroni Mean Hamacher Operator , 2018 .

[35]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Evaluation of e-commerce websites: An integrated approach under a single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic environment , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[36]  J. Dombi.  A general class of fuzzy operators, the demorgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators , 1982 .

[37]  Chao Chen,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria assessment of the energy storage technologies , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[38]  Yao Ouyang,et al.  Interval neutrosophic numbers Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[39]  Stefan Grönkvist,et al.  Large-scale storage of hydrogen , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[40]  Surapati Pramanik,et al.  Cosine Similarity Measure Based Multi-attribute Decision-making with Trapezoidal Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers , 2015 .

[41]  Bent Sørensen,et al.  Hydrogen as an energy carrier: Scenarios for future use of hydrogen in the Danish energy system , 2004 .

[42]  Jun Ye.  Some weighted aggregation operators of trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and their multiple attribute decision making method , 2017 .

[43]  Mumtaz Karatas,et al.  Hydrogen energy storage method selection using fuzzy axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process , 2020, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[44]  Christopher P. Schaber,et al.  Utility-Scale Storage of Renewable Energy , 2004 .

[45]  Adrian V. Gheorghe,et al.  Towards a hydrogen economy in Romania: Statistics, technical and scientific general aspects , 2013 .

[46]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Sustainability ranking of energy storage technologies under uncertainties , 2018 .

[47]  Jianwei Gao,et al.  An Extended VIKOR-Based Approach for Pumped Hydro Energy Storage Plant Site Selection with Heterogeneous Information , 2017, Inf..

[48]  Xiaorong He,et al.  Group decision making based on Dombi operators and its application to personnel evaluation , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[49]  Bent Sørensen,et al.  Underground hydrogen storage in geological formations, and comparison with other storage solutions , 2007 .

[50]  Dragan Pamuar,et al.  Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers , 2017 .

[51]  Arif Darmawan,et al.  A conceptual chemical looping combustion power system design in a power-to-gas energy storage scenario , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[52]  Yusuf Subas,et al.  A ranking method of single valued neutrosophic numbers and its applications to multi-attribute decision making problems , 2016, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[53]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Evaluation of energy storage technologies for integration with renewable electricity: Quantifying expert opinions , 2012 .

[54]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R'AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry , 2018 .

[55]  F. Gracceva,et al.  Hydrogen perspectives in Italy: Analysis of possible deployment scenarios , 2008 .

[56]  Wende Zhang,et al.  Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on trapezoidal fuzzy neutrosophic numbers , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[57]  Yi Wang,et al.  Fuzzy stochastic multi-criteria decision-making methods with interval neutrosophic probability based on regret theory , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[58]  Jun Ye,et al.  Dombi Aggregation Operators of Neutrosophic Cubic Sets for Multiple Attribute Decision-Making , 2018, Algorithms.

[59]  U. Lindblom,et al.  A conceptual design for compressed hydrogen storage in mined caverns , 1985 .

[60]  Lin Li,et al.  Multi-criteria group decision-making method based on interdependent inputs of single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic information , 2016, Neural Computing and Applications.

[61]  Tufan Demirel,et al.  Location selection for underground natural gas storage using Choquet integral , 2017 .

[62]  Muhammet Deveci.  Site selection for hydrogen underground storage using interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets , 2018 .

[63]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Cost assessment and evaluation of various hydrogen delivery scenarios , 2017 .

[64]  Bong-Jin Gim,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen storage systems for automobiles in Korea using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2014 .