From tangled banks to toxic bunnies; a reflection on the issues involved in developing an ecosystem approach for environmental radiation protection

OBJECTIVES The objective of this paper is to present the results of discussions at a workshop held as part of the International Congress of Radiation Research (Environmental Health stream) in Manchester UK, 2019. The main objective of the workshop was to provide a platform for radioecologists to engage with radiobiologists to address major questions around developing an Ecosystem approach in radioecology and radiation protection of the environment. The aim was to establish a critical framework to guide research that would permit integration of a pan-ecosystem approach into radiation protection guidelines and regulation for the environment. CONCLUSIONS The conclusions were that the interaction between radioecologists and radiobiologists is useful in particular in addressing field versus laboratory issues where there are issues and challenges in designing good field experiments and a need to cross validate field data against laboratory data and vice versa. Other main conclusions were that there is a need to appreciate wider issues in ecology to design good approaches for an ecosystems approach in radioecology and that with the capture of "Big Data", novel tools such as machine learning can now be applied to help with the complex issues involved in developing an ecosystem approach.

[1]  A. Møller,et al.  High frequency of albinism and tumours in free-living birds around Chernobyl. , 2013, Mutation research.

[2]  A. Møller,et al.  Increased oxidative stress in barn swallows from the Chernobyl region. , 2010, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[3]  M. Wood,et al.  Radionuclide transfer to wildlife at a 'Reference site' in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone and resultant radiation exposures. , 2020, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[4]  Awadhesh N Jha,et al.  Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[5]  Michael E. Byrne,et al.  Quantifying the spatial and temporal variation in dose from external exposure to radiation: a new tool for use on free-ranging wildlife. , 2015, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[6]  E. Bailey,et al.  Impact of Environmental Radiation on the Health and Reproductive Status of Fish from Chernobyl. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Low doses and non‐targeted effects in environmental radiation protection; where are we now and where should we go? , 2017, Environmental research.

[8]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Fusing shallow and deep learning for bioacoustic bird species classification , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[9]  A. Rubanovich,et al.  The Dose and Dose-Rate Effects of Paternal Irradiation on Transgenerational Instability in Mice: A Radiotherapy Connection , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  Cd-tolerant Suillus luteus: a fungal insurance for pines exposed to Cd. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[11]  M. Lynch,et al.  Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium , 2016, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[12]  D. Copplestone,et al.  Variation in chronic radiation exposure does not drive life history divergence among Daphnia populations across the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[13]  S. Geras’kin,et al.  Effects of long-term chronic exposure to radionuclides in plant populations. , 2013, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[14]  M. Wood,et al.  Selecting passive dosimetry technologies for measuring the external dose of terrestrial wildlife. , 2018, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[15]  K. Staenz,et al.  Spectral unmixing of airborne hyperspectral data for baseline mapping of mine tailings areas , 2008 .

[16]  N. Beresford,et al.  More than thirty years after the Chernobyl accident: What do we know about the effects of radiation on the environment? , 2019, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[17]  J. Marchesi,et al.  Host-microbiota interactions: from holobiont theory to analysis , 2019, Microbiome.

[18]  Maciej Swat,et al.  Systems oncology: towards patient-specific treatment regimes informed by multiscale mathematical modelling. , 2015, Seminars in cancer biology.

[19]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Radiation effects and ecological processes in a freshwater microcosm. , 2019, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[20]  R. Seidl,et al.  Harnessing Deep Learning in Ecology: An Example Predicting Bark Beetle Outbreaks , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[21]  K. Makova,et al.  Elevated mitochondrial genome variation after 50 generations of radiation exposure in a wild rodent , 2017, Evolutionary applications.

[22]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Field studies reveal functions of chemical mediators in plant interactions. , 2018, Chemical Society reviews.

[23]  Sharon Munn,et al.  Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) development I: strategies and principles. , 2014, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[24]  N. Beresford,et al.  Genetic, epigenetic and microbiome characterisation of an earthworm species (Octolasion lacteum) along a radiation exposure gradient at Chernobyl. , 2019, Environmental pollution.

[25]  E. Scott,et al.  Field effects studies in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone: Lessons to be learnt. , 2019, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[26]  L. Barnthouse,et al.  Using an Ecosystem Approach to complement protection schemes based on organism-level endpoints. , 2014, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[27]  Isao Kawaguchi,et al.  Inter-comparison of population models for the calculation of radiation dose effects on wildlife , 2012, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics.

[28]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Chronic exposure by ingestion of environmentally relevant doses of 226Ra leads to transient growth perturbations in fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas, Rafinesque, 1820) , 2013, International journal of radiation biology.

[29]  Manigandan Muniraj,et al.  Geo tagged internet of things (iot) device for radiation monitoring , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[30]  G. Milinevsky,et al.  Highly reduced mass loss rates and increased litter layer in radioactively contaminated areas , 2014, Oecologia.

[31]  P. Matson,et al.  Special Feature: The Relative Contributions to Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Forces in Population and Community Ecology , 1992 .

[32]  A. Møller,et al.  Abundance and genetic damage of barn swallows from Fukushima , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[33]  E. Levin,et al.  The toxicology of climate change: environmental contaminants in a warming world. , 2009, Environment international.

[34]  B. Gaylord,et al.  Evolutionary change during experimental ocean acidification , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Gary S. Caldwell,et al.  Integrative assessment of low-dose gamma radiation effects on Daphnia magna reproduction: Toxicity pathway assembly and AOP development. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  A. Møller,et al.  Resistance of Feather-Associated Bacteria to Intermediate Levels of Ionizing Radiation near Chernobyl , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[37]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Transgenerational effects of historic radiation dose in pale grass blue butterflies around Fukushima following the Fukushima Dai‐ichi Nuclear Power Plant meltdown accident , 2019, Environmental research.

[38]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Regulation in Terrestrial Ecosystems, and the Implied Balance of Nature , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[39]  A. Møller,et al.  Elevated Frequency of Cataracts in Birds from Chernobyl , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  M. Wood,et al.  Addressing current knowledge gaps on radionuclide transfer to reptiles , 2011 .

[41]  C. Streffer Transgenerational transmission of radiation damage: genomic instability and congenital malformation. , 2006, Journal of radiation research.

[42]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Targets, pools, shoulders, and communication – a reflection on the evolution of low-dose radiobiology , 2019, International journal of radiation biology.

[43]  J. Beasley,et al.  Long-term census data reveal abundant wildlife populations at Chernobyl , 2015, Current Biology.

[44]  James H. Brown,et al.  Experimental Manipulation of a Desert Rodent Community: Food Addition and Species Removal , 1985 .

[45]  A. Møller,et al.  Long‐term effects of ionizing radiation after the Chernobyl accident: Possible contribution of historic dose , 2018, Environmental research.

[46]  A. Bano,et al.  Adaptation of chickpea to desiccation stress is enhanced by symbiotic rhizobia , 2010, Symbiosis.

[47]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  Epigenetics for ecologists. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[48]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Decision-Making in Agent-Based Modeling: A Current Review and Future Prospectus , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[49]  D. Hickey,et al.  COMPETITION BETWEEN METAL TOLERANT AND NORMAL PLANT POPULATIONS; A FIELD EXPERIMENT ON NORMAL SOIL , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[50]  A. Soares,et al.  Validation of a two-generational reproduction test in Daphnia magna: An interlaboratory exercise. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[51]  Ursula Kälin,et al.  Defoliation estimation of forest trees from ground-level images , 2019 .

[52]  Kristian Zarb Adami,et al.  A Machine Learning approach for automatic land cover mapping from DSLR images over the Maltese Islands , 2018, Environ. Model. Softw..

[53]  J J DeMarco,et al.  A Monte Carlo-based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: from phantom testing to patient-specific models , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[54]  A. Møller,et al.  Ionizing radiation, antioxidant response and oxidative damage: A meta-analysis. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[55]  D. Oughton,et al.  A framework for exposure characterization and gamma dosimetry at the NMBU FIGARO irradiation facility , 2018, International journal of radiation biology.

[56]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[57]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[58]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Effects of historic radiation dose on the frequency of sex-linked recessive lethals in Drosophila populations following the Chernobyl nuclear accident. , 2019, Environmental research.

[59]  K. Beaugelin-Seiller,et al.  Estimating radiological exposure of wildlife in the field. , 2018, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[60]  B. Blaylock The fecundity of a Gambysia affinis affinis population exposed to chronic environmental radiation. , 1969, Radiation research.

[61]  K Beaugelin-Seiller,et al.  Are radiosensitivity data derived from natural field conditions consistent with data from controlled exposures? A case study of Chernobyl wildlife chronically exposed to low dose rates. , 2013, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[62]  E. Kazakova,et al.  Scots pine as a promising indicator organism for biomonitoring of the polluted environment: A case study on chronically irradiated populations. , 2019, Mutation research.

[63]  A. Dmitriev,et al.  Effect of chronic irradiation on plant resistance to biotic stress in 30-km chernobyl nuclear power plant exclusion zone , 2011, Russian Journal of Plant Physiology.

[64]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Eco-systems biology--from the gene to the stream. , 2010, Mutation research.

[65]  S. Geras’kin,et al.  Chronic radiation exposure modifies temporal dynamics of cytogenetic but not reproductive indicators in Scots pine populations. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[66]  A. Jaworska,et al.  Realism and usefulness of multispecies experiment designs with regard to application in radioecology: A review. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[67]  Eric Hervet,et al.  Applications for deep learning in ecology , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[68]  K. Nishikawa,et al.  Mechanism of evolution by genetic assimilation , 2018, Biophysical Reviews.

[69]  J. Vives i Batlle,et al.  Population modelling to compare chronic external radiotoxicity between individual and population endpoints in four taxonomic groups. , 2016, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[70]  K. Beaugelin-Seiller,et al.  Effects of radionuclide contamination on leaf litter decomposition in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[71]  K Beaugelin-Seiller,et al.  Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context—an overview of the PROTECT coordinated action project , 2010, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[72]  M. Wood,et al.  Measuring the radiation exposure of Norwegian reindeer under field conditions. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[73]  Timothy D. Solberg,et al.  Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology: Opportunities, Requirements, and Needs , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[74]  Neil W. Fuller,et al.  Chronic radiation exposure at Chernobyl shows no effect on genetic diversity in the freshwater crustacean, Asellus aquaticus thirty years on , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[75]  A. Jha Genotoxicological studies in aquatic organisms: an overview. , 2004, Mutation research.

[76]  O. Lind,et al.  In vivo assessment of reactive oxygen species production and oxidative stress effects induced by chronic exposure to gamma radiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2019, Free radical biology & medicine.

[77]  I. Schlosser,et al.  9 – Bottom-Up versus Top-Down Regulation of Vertebrate Populations: Lessons from Birds and Fish , 1992 .

[78]  J. Carr,et al.  Adaptive response in frogs chronically exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation in the environment. , 2011, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[79]  S. McCready,et al.  Long term effects of Chernobyl contamination on DNA repair function and plant resistance to different biotic and abiotic stress factors , 2016, Cytology and Genetics.

[80]  D. Biron,et al.  Understanding low radiation background biology through controlled evolution experiments , 2017, Evolutionary applications.

[81]  A. Møller,et al.  Species richness and abundance of forest birds in relation to radiation at Chernobyl , 2007, Biology Letters.

[82]  M. Wood,et al.  Dose assessment in environmental radiological protection: State of the art and perspectives. , 2017, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[83]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Body Size and Consumer-Resource Dynamics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[84]  Y. Dubrova,et al.  The combined effects of acute irradiation and food supply on survival and fertility in Daphnia magna. , 2019, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[85]  Weng-Keen Wong,et al.  Status of research and development of learning-based approaches in nuclear science and engineering: A review , 2020 .

[86]  Y. Dubrova,et al.  The long-term effects of acute exposure to ionising radiation on survival and fertility in Daphnia magna. , 2016, Environmental research.

[87]  Tzu-Husan Lin,et al.  Development of an intelligent disaster information-integrated platform for radiation monitoring , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[88]  S. A. Geraskin,et al.  Genetic consequences of radioactive contamination by the Chernobyl fallout to agricultural crops. , 2003, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[89]  H. Burbano,et al.  Genomic basis and evolutionary potential for extreme drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[90]  Kathryn Higley,et al.  A comparison of the ellipsoidal and voxelized dosimetric methodologies for internal, heterogeneous radionuclide sources. , 2015, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[91]  K. McCann The diversity–stability debate , 2000, Nature.

[92]  A. Whitehead,et al.  Adaptive introgression enables evolutionary rescue from extreme environmental pollution , 2019, Science.

[93]  O. Loucks,et al.  From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology , 1995, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[94]  Ecosystems effects 25 years after Chernobyl: pollinators, fruit set and recruitment , 2012, Oecologia.

[95]  M. Johansen,et al.  Comparison of Homogeneous and Particulate Lung Dose Rates For Small Mammals , 2017, Health physics.

[96]  A. Møller,et al.  Chronic exposure to low-dose radiation at Chernobyl favours adaptation to oxidative stress in birds , 2014, Functional Ecology.

[97]  A. Møller,et al.  DNA damage in barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) from the Chernobyl region detected by use of the comet assay. , 2010, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[98]  M. Timmermans,et al.  Genetic Variation in Toxicant-Stressed Populations: An Evaluation of the “Genetic Erosion” Hypothesis , 2002 .

[99]  J. Levinton,et al.  Rapid loss of genetically based resistance to metals after the cleanup of a Superfund site , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[100]  Margaret Kosmala,et al.  Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[101]  P. Schofield,et al.  Evolving paradigms for the biological response to low dose ionizing radiation; the role of epigenetics , 2018, International journal of radiation biology.

[102]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-based models in ecology after four decades , 2014, F1000prime reports.

[103]  S. Fesenko Review of radiation effects in non-human species in areas affected by the Kyshtym accident , 2019, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[104]  D. Oughton,et al.  Current evidence for a role of epigenetic mechanisms in response to ionizing radiation in an ecotoxicological context. , 2019, Environmental pollution.

[105]  N. Morley The effects of radioactive pollution on the dynamics of infectious diseases in wildlife. , 2012, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[106]  P. Romeo,et al.  Low-Dose Irradiation Promotes Persistent Oxidative Stress and Decreases Self-Renewal in Hematopoietic Stem Cells. , 2017, Cell reports.

[107]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Priming and filtering of anti-herbivore defenses among Nicotiana attenuata plants connected by mycorrhizal networks. , 2019, Plant, cell & environment.

[108]  C. Mothersill,et al.  One-Decade-Spanning transgenerational effects of historic radiation dose in wild populations of bank voles exposed to radioactive contamination following the chernobyl nuclear disaster. , 2019, Environmental research.

[109]  A. Møller,et al.  Elevated Mortality among Birds in Chernobyl as Judged from Skewed Age and Sex Ratios , 2012, PloS one.

[110]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Parental gamma irradiation induces reprotoxic effects accompanied by genomic instability in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos , 2017, Environmental research.

[111]  E. Kazakova,et al.  Radiation exposure in the remote period after the Chernobyl accident caused oxidative stress and genetic effects in Scots pine populations , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[112]  J. E. Burrows,et al.  Towards solving a scientific controversy - The effects of ionising radiation on the environment. , 2020, Journal of environmental radioactivity.