Retrieval practice as a learning strategy for individuals with Down syndrome A preliminary study

ABSTRACT. Remembering recently studied materials (i.e., retrieval practice) is more beneficial for learning than restudying these materials. Objective: To investigate whether retrieval practice benefits learning for individuals with Down syndrome. Methods: Eighteen individuals with Down syndrome (mean age=21.61 years, SD=5.93) performed a task entailing a first read of an encyclopedic text covering a series of target words. After reading the text twice, participants recalled half of the target words (retrieval practice), and reread the other half (restudy). After 48 hours, participants answered a multiple-choice test including all target words. Subsequently, WASI’s Vocabulary and Matrix reasoning subtests were administered to estimate intelligence. Results: The benefit of retrieval practice for learning was numerically greater than the benefit of restudy, although this advantage did not reach statistical significance. Inspection of individual data suggested that the benefit of retrieval practice was greater than the benefit of restudy for the majority of the participants, independently of the participants’ vocabulary or reasoning abilities. Conclusion: Although more research is needed before retrieval practice can be recommended as a learning strategy for individuals with Down syndrome, the data suggest that retrieval practice can be a useful teaching tool for at least part of this population.

[1]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing , 2017 .

[2]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Retrieval-Based Learning: Positive Effects of Retrieval Practice in Elementary School Children , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[3]  Jackie L. Gottshall,et al.  Diminished testing benefits in young adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder , 2015, Memory.

[4]  Antônio Jaeger,et al.  Test-enhanced learning in third-grade children , 2015 .

[5]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Does testing with feedback help grade-school children learn key concepts in science? , 2014 .

[6]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[7]  Raquel Eloísa Eisenkraemer,et al.  Una Revision Sistematica del Efecto de Prueba en el Aprendizaje , 2013 .

[8]  Stefano Vicari,et al.  Executive functions in intellectual disabilities: a comparison between Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. , 2013, Research in developmental disabilities.

[9]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Quizzing in Middle-School Science: Successful Transfer Performance on Classroom Exams , 2013 .

[10]  Xiaoping Pu,et al.  The effectiveness of test-enhanced learning depends on trait test anxiety and working-memory capacity. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[11]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory , 2012 .

[12]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: An experimental study , 2012 .

[13]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: long-term improvements from quizzing. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  Robert A Bjork,et al.  When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning in a Middle School Science Classroom: The Effects of Quiz Frequency and Placement. , 2011 .

[16]  Chi-Shing Tse,et al.  The Benefits and Costs of Repeated Testing on the Learning of Face–name Pairs in Healthy Older Adults Face–name Learning in Healthy Older Adults , 2022 .

[17]  John DeLuca,et al.  Retrieval practice: A simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury , 2010, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[18]  John Deluca,et al.  Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect. , 2010, Neuropsychology.

[19]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Using tests to enhance 8th grade students' retention of U.S. history facts , 2009 .

[20]  A. C. Butler,et al.  Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Long-Term Memory for Verbal and Visual Information in Down Syndrome and Williams Syndrome: Performance on the Doors and People Test , 2007, Cortex.

[22]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention , 2007 .

[23]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[24]  D. Bandeira,et al.  Matrizes progressivas coloridas de Raven - escala especial: normas para Porto Alegre, RS , 2004 .

[25]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Verbal and visuospatial working memory deficits in children with Down syndrome. , 2004, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[26]  G. Carlesimo,et al.  Long-term memory in mental retardation: Evidence for a specific impairment in subjects with Down's syndrome , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Sn Ramraje,et al.  Comparison of the effect of post-instruction multiple-choice and short-answer tests on delayed retention learning. , 2011, The Australasian medical journal.

[28]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Education and children with Down syndrome: neuroscience, development, and intervention. , 2007, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.