Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis

We compared the configurational and firing properties of 7270 motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) recorded with either concentric (CNE) or monopolar (MNE) needle electrodes from the brachial biceps and anterior tibial muscles of 10 healthy young adults (mean age 27 ± 4.5 years) using automatic decomposition electromyography (ADEMG). In both muscles, mean MUAP amplitude, rise rate, and number of turns were significantly greater when recorded with MNE (paired t‐test, P < 0.001 in each case). Similar findings were observed at all three tested levels of isometric contractile force: threshold, 10% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), and 30% MVC. In contrast, there was no significant difference between electrode types on measurements of mean MUAP duration or firing rate (P > 0.05 in each case). These findings indicate that it is acceptable to generalize normative data on MUAP duration and firing rate from one electrode type to another, but that measures of MUAP amplitude and complexity require independent normative databases.

[1]  F. Buchthal,et al.  Muscle Action Potentials in Polymyositis , 1953, Neurology.

[2]  E. Adrian,et al.  The discharge of impulses in motor nerve fibres , 1929, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Electrical properties of commercial concentric EMG electrodes , 1985, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part I: Turns and amplitude measurements , 1986, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their dependence on physical variables. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[6]  H. Jasper,et al.  Unipolar electromyograms of normal and denervated human muscle. , 1949, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Automatic Decomposition of the Clinical Electromyogram , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  J. Petajan,et al.  Frequency control of motor unit action potentials. , 1969, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  L J Dorfman,et al.  Age effects on properties of motor unit action potentials: ADEMG analysis , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[10]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for Measurement , 1986, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[11]  K. McGill,et al.  Automatic decomposition electromyography (ADEMG): validation and normative data in brachial biceps. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  E Stålberg,et al.  Automatic analysis of the EMG interference pattern. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.