Ability × Treatment Interaction Effects on Children's Learning in Large-group and Small-group Approaches

This study investigated ability × treatment interaction effects on students' learning in large-group and small-group teaching approaches. Each of two elementary teachers taught a 2-week geometry unit to two classes of fourth- and fifth-grade students. Each class received one teaching approach. Stratified random assignment was used to assign students to classes. Students completed aptitude measures at the beginning of the study and achievement, attitude, and retention measures at the end. Regression analyses showed a significant curvilinear aptitude-treatment interaction (ATI) for ability that supported previous ATI findings. High- and low-ability students did better in the small-group approach than in the large-group approach. Medium-ability students did slightly better in the large-group approach than in the small-group approach. Analyses of observations of group processes indicated that high- and low-ability students benefited from peer tutoring processes that occurred in the small groups.

[1]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Children's Learning in Large-Group and Small-Group Approaches: Study II. Report from the Project on Studies of Instructional Programming for the Individual Student. , 1979 .

[2]  Vernon L. Allen,et al.  Children as teachers : theory and research on tutoring , 1976 .

[3]  David L. DeVries.  Teams-Games-Tournament (TGT) Effects on Reading Skills in the Elementary Grades. Report No. 200. , 1975 .

[4]  K. Dunn,et al.  Teaching Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: A Practical Approach , 1978 .

[5]  L. Cronbach.  Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. , 1975 .

[6]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitude and instructional methods , 1977 .

[7]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[8]  G. O. M. Leith,et al.  INDIVIDUAL VERSUS CO‐OPERATIVE LEARNING , 1969 .

[9]  W. Dixon.  BMD : biomedical computer programs , 1967 .

[10]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Research on teaching : concepts, findings and implications , 1981 .

[11]  M. Clifford.  A Revised Measure of Locus of Control. , 1976 .

[12]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Learning through Tutoring: Low-Achieving Children as Tutors. , 1973 .

[13]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[14]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  4: Psychology of Learning Environments: Behavioral, Structural, or Perceptual? , 1976 .

[15]  P. Peterson.  Interactive effects of student anxiety, achievement orientation, and teacher behavior on student achievement and attitude. , 1977, Journal of educational psychology.

[16]  S. Sharan.  Cooperative Learning in Small Groups: Recent Methods and Effects on Achievement, Attitudes, and Ethnic Relations , 1980 .

[17]  David L. DeVries,et al.  Team Competition and Group Practice: Effects on Student Achievement and Attitudes. Report No. 212. , 1976 .

[18]  D. Devries,et al.  Learning Games and Student Teams: Their Effects on Student Attitudes and Achievement. , 1972 .

[19]  R. Cloward.  14 – Teenagers as Tutors of Academically Low-Achieving Children: Impact on Tutors and Tutees , 1976 .

[20]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Learning in individual and small group settings , 1977 .

[21]  Eva Nick,et al.  The dependability of behavioral measurements: theory of generalizability for scores and profiles , 1973 .

[22]  H. Klausmeier.  First Year of Intervention Study to Facilitate Children's Concept Learning. Technical Report No. 424. , 1976 .

[23]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. , 1974 .

[24]  D. Solomon,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Children's Performance in Varied Educational Settings. Final Report. , 1976 .