Accessing newly learned names and meanings in the native language

Ten healthy adults encountered pictures of unfamiliar archaic tools and successfully learned either their name, verbal definition of their usage, or both. Neural representation of the newly acquired information was probed with magnetoencephalography in an overt picture‐naming task before and after learning, and in two categorization tasks after learning. Within 400 ms, activation proceeded from occipital through parietal to left temporal cortex, inferior frontal cortex (naming) and right temporal cortex (categorization). Comparison of naming of newly learned versus familiar pictures indicated that acquisition and maintenance of word forms are supported by the same neural network. Explicit access to newly learned phonology when such information was known strongly enhanced left temporal activation. By contrast, access to newly learned semantics had no comparable, direct neural effects. Both the behavioral learning pattern and neurophysiological results point to fundamentally different implementation of and access to phonological versus semantic features in processing pictured objects. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[2]  W. Glaser Picture naming , 1992, Cognition.

[3]  Stephan Heckers,et al.  Hippocampal and brain stem activation during word retrieval after repeated and semantic encoding. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Thomas Elbert,et al.  Semantic Categorization in the Human Brain , 2003, Psychological science.

[5]  J. Rodd,et al.  Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach , 1999, Psychological research.

[7]  R. Hari,et al.  Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming , 1994, Nature.

[8]  R Salmelin,et al.  Information processing in the human brain: magnetoencephalographic approach. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Learning new names for new objects: Cortical effects as measured by magnetoencephalography , 2004, Brain and Language.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Anatomic Constraints on Cognitive Theories of Category Specificity , 2002, NeuroImage.

[11]  Matti Laine,et al.  Anomia: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects , 2006 .

[12]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[13]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Alex Martin,et al.  A neural system for learning about object function. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  The Neural Substrate of Picture Naming , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Ullman Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model , 2004, Cognition.

[17]  Paolo Vitali,et al.  Generating animal and tool names: An fMRI study of effective connectivity , 2005, Brain and Language.

[18]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The phonological loop as a language learning device. , 1998, Psychological review.

[19]  Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al.  Phonological encoding is not contingent on semantic feature retrieval: an electrophysiological study on object naming. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  R Todd Constable,et al.  The neurobiology of adaptive learning in reading: A contrast of different training conditions , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Cortical dynamics of visual/semantic vs. phonological analysis in picture confrontation , 2006, NeuroImage.

[22]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  Differential bilingual laterality: mythical monster found in Wales , 2002, Brain and Language.

[23]  M Boucart,et al.  Neural correlates of implicit object identification , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  S. Bookheimer Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Stefano F. Cappa,et al.  Word and picture matching: a PET study of semantic category effects , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Global shape cannot be attended without object identification. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Naming actions and objects: cortical dynamics in healthy adults and in an anomic patient with a dissociation in action/object naming , 2003, NeuroImage.

[30]  Matti Laine,et al.  Naming of newly learned objects: a PET activation study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  An MEG Study of Picture Naming , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  H. Freund,et al.  Single word reading in developmental stutterers and fluent speakers. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  M. Jung-Beeman Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Karl Zilles,et al.  A New Approach to Fast Elastic Alignment with Applications to Human Brain , 1996, VBC.

[35]  W. Levelt,et al.  Semantic Category Interference in Overt Picture Naming: Sharpening Current Density Localization by PCA , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Alex Martin,et al.  Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  Jean-François Démonet,et al.  Lexical learning of the English language: a PET study in healthy French subjects , 2004, NeuroImage.

[38]  Jean K. Gordon,et al.  A Neural Signature of Phonological Access: Distinguishing the Effects of Word Frequency from Familiarity and Length in Overt Picture Naming , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  C. Price,et al.  Three Distinct Ventral Occipitotemporal Regions for Reading and Object Naming , 1999, NeuroImage.

[40]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Adult Brain Plasticity Elicited by Anomia Treatment , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Storage and Rehearsal in Verbal Working Memory: Evidence From Positron Emission Tomography , 1996 .

[42]  S Kuriki,et al.  Motor planning center for speech articulation in the normal human brain. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[43]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon , 2005, NeuroImage.

[44]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Naming the Same Entities from Visual or from Auditory Stimulation Engages Similar Regions of Left Inferotemporal Cortices , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  L. Stowe,et al.  Rethinking the neurological basis of language , 2005 .

[46]  R. Salmelin Clinical neurophysiology of language: The MEG approach , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.