ESTIMATING SELECTION ON NEONATAL TRAITS IN RED DEER USING ELASTICITY PATH ANALYSIS

Abstract Van Tienderen recently published a method that links selection gradients between a phenotypic trait and multiple fitness components with the effects of these fitness components on the population growth rate (mean absolute fitness). The method allows selection to be simultaneously estimated across multiple fitness components in a population dynamic framework. In this paper we apply the method to a population of red deer living in the North Block of the Isle of Rum, Scotland. We show that (1) selection on birth date and birth weight can operate through multiple fitness components simultaneously; (2) our estimates of the response to selection are consistent with the observed change in trait values that we cannot explain with environmental and phenotypic covariates; (3) selection on both traits has fluctuated over the course of the study; (4) selection operates through different fitness components in different years; and (5) no environmental covariates correlate with selection because different fitness components respond to density and climatic variation in contrasting ways.

[1]  Robert H. Kushler,et al.  Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-PLUS , 2003, Technometrics.

[2]  Denis Réale,et al.  Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devil is in the detail. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Jon Slate,et al.  ANTLER SIZE IN RED DEER: HERITABILITY AND SELECTION BUT NO EVOLUTION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[6]  EVOLUTION IN THE REAL WORLD: STOCHASTIC VARIATION AND THE DETERMINANTS OF FITNESS IN CARLINA VULGARIS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  H. Kokko,et al.  Cohort effects and population dynamics , 2002 .

[8]  D. O. Logofet.  Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2002 .

[9]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  Sex differences in emigration and mortality affect optimal management of deer populations , 2002, Nature.

[10]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[11]  Ana Ivelisse Avilés,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001, Technometrics.

[12]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Cryptic evolution in a wild bird population , 2001, Nature.

[13]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  J. M. Hoekstra,et al.  The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[15]  I. Owens,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION AND QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS IN WESTERN WOMEN: A TWIN STUDY , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores , 2000 .

[17]  H. Korpelainen.  Fitness, reproduction and longevity among European aristocratic and rural Finnish families in the 1700s and 1800s , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The relative roles of density and climatic variation on population dynamics and fecundity rates in three contrasting ungulate species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  P. V. Tienderen,et al.  ELASTICITIES AND THE LINK BETWEEN DEMOGRAPHIC AND EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS , 2000 .

[20]  H. Kroon,et al.  ELASTICITIES: A REVIEW OF METHODS AND MODEL LIMITATIONS , 2000 .

[21]  S. Ellner,et al.  SIZE‐SPECIFIC SENSITIVITY: APPLYING A NEW STRUCTURED POPULATION MODEL , 2000 .

[22]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  A. Grant,et al.  Evolutionary fitness in ecology: Comparing measures of fitness in stochastic, density-dependent environments , 2000 .

[24]  J. Slate,et al.  MICROSATELLITE LOCI REVEAL SEX‐DEPENDENT RESPONSES TO INBREEDING AND OUTBREEDING IN RED DEER CALVES , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  David A. Elston,et al.  Estimating the contributions of population density and climatic fluctuations to interannual variation in survival of Soay sheep , 1999 .

[26]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer , 1999, Nature.

[28]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions in winter survival in red deer , 1998 .

[29]  The effect of age at first breeding on Ural owl lifetime reproductive success and fitness under cyclic food conditions , 1998 .

[30]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Integrated recovery/recapture data analysis , 1998 .

[31]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  Tim Coulson,et al.  POPULATION SUBSTRUCTURE, LOCAL DENSITY, AND CALF WINTER SURVIVAL IN RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) , 1997 .

[33]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Stability and Instability in Ungulate Populations: An Empirical Analysis , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[34]  J. Hurrell.  Decadal Trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional Temperatures and Precipitation , 1995, Science.

[35]  M. Festa‐Bianchet,et al.  Life History Consequences of Variation in Age of Primiparity in Bighorn Ewes , 1995 .

[36]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes , 1992 .

[37]  D. Houle.  Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. , 1992, Genetics.

[38]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Cohort Variation in Reproduction and Survival: Implications for Population Demography , 1992 .

[39]  T. Clutton‐Brock.  Reproductive success : studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems , 1989 .

[40]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. , 1988, Science.

[41]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION: STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND BIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Early development and population dynamics in red deer. I: Density-dependent effects on juvenile survival , 1987 .

[43]  B. Mitchell,et al.  Fertility in female Red deer (Cervus elaphus) : the effects of body composition, age and reproductive status , 1986 .

[44]  P. Fennessy.  Red deer—behaviour and ecology of two sexes , 1984 .

[45]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  B. Mitchell,et al.  FERTILITY AND BODY WEIGHT IN FEMALE RED DEER: A DENSITY-DEPENDENT RELATIONSHIP , 1983 .

[47]  R. Lande,et al.  A Quantitative Genetic Theory of Life History Evolution , 1982 .

[48]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .