Input-output nonlinearities and time delays increase tracking errors in hand grasp neuroprostheses.

Tracking tasks were designed to study how different input-output relationships (nonlinearities and time delays) would affect the performance of functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) hand grasp neuroprostheses. Simulated hand grasp neuroprostheses and real hand grasp neuroprostheses with and without closed-loop control were evaluated, with the subjects adjusting the input to the system so that the output would match a visual target track at three different bandwidths (able bodied subjects with the simulated systems and neuroprosthesis users with the real systems). For both systems, the tracking error increased as the input-output nonlinearity increased. Other factors that affected tracking performance were the target bandwidth and delays in the neuroprosthesis. The results support the hypothesis that hand grasp neuroprostheses with linear input-output properties and no delays will be controlled more accurately.

[1]  P.E. Crago,et al.  Assessment of input-output properties and control of neuroprosthetic hand grasp , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  J. I. Elkind,et al.  Transmission of Information in Simple Manual Control Systems , 1961 .

[3]  P. H. Peckham,et al.  Restoration of functional control by electrical stimulation in the upper extremity of the quadriplegic patient. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  Doubler Ja,et al.  An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a prosthesis-control technique. , 1984 .

[5]  Michel A. Lemay,et al.  External Control of Limb Movements Involving Environmental Interactions , 1990 .

[6]  P. Peckham,et al.  Evaluation of shoulder movement as a command control source , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Patrick E. Crago,et al.  TRACKING PERFORMANCE OF PATIENTS CONTROLLING FES HAND GRASP ORTHOSES. , 1986 .

[8]  P. H. Peckham,et al.  Closed-Loop Control of Force During Electrical Stimulation of Muscle , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  H.J. Chizeck,et al.  Feedback regulation of hand grasp opening and contact force during stimulation of paralyzed muscle , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  W. Durfee,et al.  Methods for estimating isometric recruitment curves of electrically stimulated muscle , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  M. Keith,et al.  Functional evaluation of quadriplegic patients using a hand neuroprosthesis. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  K.L. Kilgore,et al.  Synthesis of hand grasp using functional neuromuscular stimulation , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  P. Crago,et al.  Modulation of Muscle Force by Recruitment During Intramuscular Stimulation , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  P.E. Crago,et al.  Automated tuning of a closed-loop hand grasp neuroprosthesis , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  W.K. Durfee,et al.  Task-based methods for evaluating electrically stimulated antagonist muscle controllers , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  L. A. Bernotas,et al.  A Discrete-Time Model of Electrcally Stimulated Muscle , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  W K Durfee,et al.  Simulator for evaluating shoulder motion as a command source for FES grasp restoration systems. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.