Delaying discharge after the stimulus significantly decreases muscle activation thresholds with small impact on the selectivity: an in vivo study using TIME

AbstractThe number of devices for electrical stimulation of nerve fibres implanted worldwide for medical applications is constantly increasing. Stimulation charge is one of the most important parameters of stimulation. High stimulation charge may cause tissue and electrode damage and also compromise the battery life of the electrical stimulators. Therefore, the objective of minimizing stimulation charge is an important issue. Delaying the second phase of biphasic stimulation waveform may decrease the charge required for fibre activation, but its impact on stimulation selectivity is not known. This information is particularly relevant when transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) is used, since it has been designed to provide for high selectivity. In this in vivo study, the rat sciatic nerve was electrically stimulated using monopolar and bipolar configurations with TIME. The results demonstrated that the inclusion of a 100-μs delay between the cathodic and the anodic phase of the stimulus allows to reduce charge requirements by around 30 %, while only slightly affecting stimulation selectivity. This study shows that adding a delay to the typical stimulation waveform significantly ($$P < 0.001$$P<0.001) reduces the charge required for nerve fibres activation. Therefore, waveforms with the delayed discharge phase are more suitable for electrical stimulation of nerve fibres.

[1]  Jose L Pons,et al.  Converging clinical and engineering research on neurorehabilitation , 2013 .

[2]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[3]  S. P. Wright,et al.  Adjusted P-values for simultaneous inference , 1992 .

[4]  E. Javel,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties , 1999, Hearing Research.

[5]  H. Abdi.  The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons , 2006 .

[6]  David Guiraud,et al.  A distributed architecture for activating the peripheral nervous system , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  J. Thomas Mortimer,et al.  The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic stimulating currents , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Xavier Navarro,et al.  Topographical distribution of motor fascicles in the sciatic‐tibial nerve of the rat , 2010, Muscle & nerve.

[9]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  Comparison of stimulation selectivity in monopolar and bipolar configuration using the Transversal Intrafascicular Multichannel Electrode (TIME) - Preliminary results , 2013 .

[10]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  Enrico Marani,et al.  Functional electric stimulation for sensory and motor functions: progress and problems , 2003 .

[12]  W. Grill,et al.  Selective control of muscle activation with a multipolar nerve cuff electrode , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Daniel R. Merrill,et al.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  C. Azevedo-Coste,et al.  Comparative analysis of transverse intrafascicular multichannel, longitudinal intrafascicular and multipolar cuff electrodes for the selective stimulation of nerve fascicles , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  Xavier Navarro,et al.  Interfaces with the peripheral nerve for the control of neuroprostheses. , 2013, International review of neurobiology.

[16]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Neural Interfaces for Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: The State of the Art and Future Possibilities , 2011, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[17]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Development of a neurotechnological system for relieving phantom limb pain using transverse intrafascicular electrodes (TIME) , 2012, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[18]  F. Rattay.  Analysis of Models for External Stimulation of Axons , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Neil Salkind.  Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics , 2006 .

[20]  Jeffrey E. Arle,et al.  The Neuromodulation Approach , 2011 .

[21]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  Original electronic design to perform epimysial and neural stimulation in paraplegia , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[23]  S. Micera,et al.  Experimental Validation of a Hybrid Computational Model for Selective Stimulation Using Transverse Intrafascicular Multichannel Electrodes , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  Stimulation Selectivity of the “Thin-Film Longitudinal Intrafascicular Electrode” (tfLIFE) and the “Transverse Intrafascicular Multi-Channel Electrode” (TIME) in the Large Nerve Animal Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Stimulus waveforms for selective neural stimulation , 1995 .

[26]  Robert K. Shepherd,et al.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival , 2006, Hearing Research.

[27]  Christian Hauptmann,et al.  Modified Pulse Shapes for Effective Neural Stimulation , 2011, Front. Neuroeng..

[28]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  Biocompatibility of Chronically Implanted Transverse Intrafascicular Multichannel Electrode (TIME) in the Rat Sciatic Nerve , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  J. Mortimer,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Recruitment Characteristics of Direct Nerve Stimulation , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.