Evaluation of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment soil moisture simulations for the second half of the twentieth century

[1] Soil moisture trends, particularly during the growing season, are an important possible consequence of global warming. Climate model simulations of future soil moisture changes should be made with models that can produce reliable simulations of soil moisture for past climate changes. In this paper, we compare soil moisture simulations from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment climate models forced with observed climate forcings for the past century, and evaluate them using in situ soil moisture measurements from over 140 stations or districts in midlatitudes of the Northern Hemisphere. To account for the observed spatial scale of soil moisture variations, we used regionally averaged soil moisture for six regions. The models showed realistic seasonal cycles for Ukraine, Russia, and Illinois, but generally poor seasonal cycles for Mongolia and China. To explore the summer drying issue for the second half of the 20th century, we analyzed the linear trend of soil moisture for Ukraine and Russia. Observations from both regions show increases in summer for the period from 1958–1999 that were larger than most trends in the model simulations. Only two out of 25 model realizations show trends comparable to those of observations. These two trends, however, are due to internal model variability rather than a result of external forcing. Changes in precipitation and temperature cannot fully explain soil moisture increases for Ukraine and Russia, which indicates that other factors might have played a dominant role on the observed patterns for soil moisture. We suggest that changes in solar irradiance (the dimming effect) and resultant changes in evaporative demand explain most of the observed soil moisture trends. To understand such sensitivity, we analyzed soil moisture outputs in a special version of the ECHAM5 model that was capable of capturing the observed radiation pattern as a result of incorporating a sophisticated aerosol scheme. Results suggest that both radiation and precipitation patterns are required to be adequately simulated to reproduce the observed soil moisture trends realistically.

[1]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  Large-Scale Changes of Soil Wetness Induced by an Increase in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 1987 .

[2]  N. Kiang,et al.  Land Surface Model Development for the GISS GCM: Effects of Improved Canopy Physiology on Simulated Climate , 2005 .

[3]  Xingguo Mo,et al.  Evaluation of Reanalysis Soil Moisture Simulations Using Updated Chinese Soil Moisture Observations , 2005 .

[4]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  Simulated long-term changes in river discharge and soil moisture due to global warming / Simulations à long terme de changements d’écoulement fluvial et d’humidité du sol causés par le réchauffement global , 2004 .

[5]  Guiling Wang.  Agricultural drought in a future climate: results from 15 global climate models participating in the IPCC 4th assessment , 2005 .

[6]  D. Verseghy,et al.  CLASS-A Canadian Land Surface Scheme for GCMs , 1993 .

[7]  A. Pitman.  The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models , 2003 .

[8]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The land surface climatology of the community land model coupled to the NCAR community climate model , 2002 .

[9]  D. Moorhead,et al.  Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate , 2002, Nature.

[10]  D. Legates,et al.  Mean seasonal and spatial variability in gauge‐corrected, global precipitation , 1990 .

[11]  A. Robock,et al.  Scales of temporal and spatial variability of midlatitude soil moisture , 1996 .

[12]  W. Gates.  AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. , 1992 .

[13]  R. Betts,et al.  Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records , 2006, Nature.

[14]  David A. Robinson,et al.  Land surface conditions over Eurasia and Indian summer monsoon rainfall , 2003 .

[15]  T. Wigley,et al.  Influences of precipitation changes and direct CO2 effects on streamflow , 1985, Nature.

[16]  Luca Bonaventura,et al.  The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM 5. PART I: Model description , 2003 .

[17]  R. Betts,et al.  The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity , 1999 .

[18]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Technical Description of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2004 .

[19]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Modern Global Climate Change , 2003, Science.

[20]  Kumiko Takata,et al.  Development of the minimal advanced treatments of surface interaction and runoff , 2003 .

[21]  G. Meehl,et al.  A Comparison of Soil-Moisture Sensitivity in Two Global Climate Models , 1988 .

[22]  E. Dutton,et al.  Do Satellites Detect Trends in Surface Solar Radiation? , 2004, Science.

[23]  John S. Woollen,et al.  NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society . , 2002 .

[24]  GLOWA-Danube INTEGRATIVE TECHNIQUES , SZENARIOS AND STRATEGIES REGARDING GLOBAL CHANGE OF THE WATER CYCLE , 2005 .

[25]  Soliciting Participation in Climate Model Analyses Leading to IPCC Fourth Assessment Report , 2004 .

[26]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Land-Surface Model Development for the GISS GCM , 1997 .

[27]  P. Milly.  Sensitivity of greenhouse summer dryness to changes in plant rooting characteristics , 1997 .

[28]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale , 1995 .

[29]  Scott A. Isard,et al.  A Soil Moisture Climatology of Illinois , 1994 .

[30]  A. Robock,et al.  The Global Soil Moisture Data Bank , 2000 .

[31]  P. Dirmeyer,et al.  Improving the quality of simulated soil moisture with a multi‐model ensemble approach , 2007 .

[32]  P. Milly,et al.  Global Modeling of Land Water and Energy Balances. Part I: The Land Dynamics (LaD) Model , 2002 .

[33]  K. Taylor.  Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[34]  P. Jones,et al.  REPRESENTING TWENTIETH CENTURY SPACE-TIME CLIMATE VARIABILITY. , 1998 .

[35]  R. Hirsch,et al.  Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data , 1982 .

[36]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Simulations of a boreal grassland hydrology at Valdai, Russia: PILPS phase 2(d). , 2000 .

[37]  Mingquan Mu,et al.  Forty‐five years of observed soil moisture in the Ukraine: No summer desiccation (yet) , 2004 .

[38]  G. Bonan.  The Land Surface Climatology of the NCAR Land Surface Model Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model , 1998 .

[39]  A. Robock,et al.  Solar dimming and CO2 effects on soil moisture trends , 2006 .

[40]  Suxia Liu,et al.  Evaluation of Global Soil Wetness Project Soil Moisture Simulations , 1999 .

[41]  P. Dirmeyer,et al.  Comparison, Validation, and Transferability of Eight Multiyear Global Soil Wetness Products , 2004 .

[42]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Effects of frozen soil on soil temperature, spring infiltration, and runoff: Results from the PILPS 2(d) experiment at Valdai, Russia , 2003 .

[43]  J. Gregory,et al.  Summer Drought in Northern Midlatitudes in a Time-Dependent CO2 Climate Experiment , 1997 .

[44]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The Interplay between Transpiration and Runoff Formulations in Land Surface Schemes Used with Atmospheric Models , 1997 .

[45]  T. Peterson,et al.  Evaporation losing its strength , 1995, Nature.

[46]  O. Boucher,et al.  The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2004 .

[47]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space-Time Climate Variability. Part II: Development of 1901-96 Monthly Grids of Terrestrial Surface Climate , 2000 .

[48]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  Can aerosols spin down the water cycle in a warmer and moister world? , 2004 .

[49]  Jared Entin,et al.  Evaluation of the AMIP soil moisture simulations , 1998 .

[50]  A. Robock,et al.  Soil moisture simulations in revised AMIP models. , 2000 .

[51]  J. Pal,et al.  Summer dryness in a warmer climate: a process study with a regional climate model , 2002 .

[52]  M. Wild,et al.  Regional climate simulation with a high resolution GCM: surface hydrology , 1996 .

[53]  Mark Heuer,et al.  Influences of biomass heat and biochemical energy storages on the land surface fluxes and radiative temperature , 2007 .

[54]  Piers J. Sellers,et al.  Effects of implementing the simple biosphere model in a general circulation model , 1989 .

[55]  M. Roderick,et al.  The cause of decreased pan evaporation over the past 50 years. , 2002, Science.

[56]  M. Kanamitsu,et al.  NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2) , 2002 .

[57]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[58]  C. Long,et al.  From Dimming to Brightening: Decadal Changes in Solar Radiation at Earth's Surface , 2005, Science.

[59]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Class—A Canadian land surface scheme for GCMS. I. Soil model , 2007 .

[60]  B. Bonan,et al.  A Land Surface Model (LSM Version 1.0) for Ecological, Hydrological, and Atmospheric Studies: Technical Description and User's Guide , 1996 .

[61]  A. Henderson‐sellers,et al.  Sensitivity of global climate model simulations to increased stomatal resistance and CO2 increases , 1995 .