A contingency model of perceived effectiveness in accounting information systems: Organizational coordination and control effects

Abstract A contingency model is advanced that examines sources of requirements for organizational coordination and control as they affect the extent of integration in an accounting information system. Requirements that are contingent on the degree of organizational formalization, information interdependence among functional areas, and dependence in interorganizational information sharing and electronic data interchange links, are examined. The congruence or fit of system integration with those requirements is a key concept that influences beliefs about system effectiveness. Results of the empirical study indicated that, as hypothesized, the fit between the accounting system design and the contingency factors resulted in a more successful system. Specifically, system fit was a significant factor that explained variations in perceived AIS effectiveness, as measured by decision makers' perceived satisfaction with the accuracy and monitoring effectiveness of output information. The effect of system fit on a second factor of perceived AIS effectiveness, as measured by decision-makers' satisfaction with the perceived quality of information content in system outputs, was only marginally significant. The study addresses an important area in accounting systems research that directly relates to the decision facilitation and control objectives of accounting information.

[1]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Postauditing capital expenditures and firm performance: The role of asymmetric information , 1992 .

[2]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[3]  William J. Doll,et al.  Test‐Retest Reliability of the End‐User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1991 .

[4]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[5]  J. Zimmerman.  Accounting for Decision Making and Control , 1994 .

[6]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis , 1983 .

[7]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation , 1984 .

[8]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Design of Cost Management Systems , 1998 .

[9]  J. Galaskiewicz,et al.  Interorganizational Coordination: Theory, Research, and Implementation , 1982 .

[10]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Determinants of Electronic Integration in the Insurance Industry: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[11]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[12]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems , 1976 .

[13]  Knowlton W. Johnson.  Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use , 1998 .

[14]  M. Aiken,et al.  Routine Technology, Social Structure, and Organization Goals , 1969 .

[15]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[16]  Stephanie S. Barrett,et al.  Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems , 1982, MIS Q..

[17]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  SAP: integrated information systems and the implications for management accountants , 1998 .

[18]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[19]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[20]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  The Impact of Data Integration on the Costs and Benefits of Information Systems , 1992, MIS Q..

[21]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[23]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  On the Repeated Test-Retest Reliability of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument: A Comment* , 1994 .

[24]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Management control systems and departmental interdependencies: An empirical study , 1987 .

[25]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Organization Theory and Methodology , 1998 .

[27]  E QuinnRobert,et al.  A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria , 1983 .

[28]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[29]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[30]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Resource Sharing Among Sbus: Strategic Antecedents and Administrative Implications , 1986 .

[31]  Thomas H. Jerdee,et al.  The Job(s) of Management , 1965 .

[32]  Robert A. Simons.  Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis , 1987 .

[33]  C. Fisher,et al.  The impact of perceived environmental uncertainty and individual differences on management information requirements: A research note☆ , 1996 .

[34]  K. Cameron,et al.  A Study of Organizational Effectiveness and Its Predictors , 1983 .

[35]  C. D. Wrigley,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.

[36]  Christopher G. Gresov.  Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. , 1989 .

[37]  Lokman Mia,et al.  The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness , 1994 .

[38]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[39]  RamamurthyK.,et al.  Implementation of electronic data interchange , 1994 .

[40]  L W Fry,et al.  Technology-structure research: three critical issues. , 1982, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[41]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[42]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[43]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[44]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[45]  Keen.  An Empirical Evaluation of User Information Satisfaction (UIS) Measures for Use with General Ledger Accounting Software I. Introduction , 2002 .

[46]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Budgetary Participation and Managerial Performance : The Impact of Information and Environmental Volatility , 1992 .

[47]  Vincent K. Chong,et al.  Management accounting systems, task uncertainty and managerial performance: A research note , 1996 .

[48]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[49]  A. Lewin,et al.  Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[50]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[51]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  User satisfaction , 1994 .

[52]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Information Links and Electronic Marketplaces: The Role of Interorganizational Information Systems in Vertical Markets , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[54]  H DavenportThomas.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system , 1998 .

[55]  BakosJ. Yannis.  Information links and electronic marketplaces , 1991 .

[56]  J. Fredrickson.  The Strategic Decision Process and Organizational Structure , 1986 .

[57]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  Strategy, Control Systems, and Resource Sharing: Effects on Business-Unit Performance , 1990 .

[58]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[59]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[60]  D. Otley.  The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis , 1980 .

[61]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[62]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[63]  F. Gul,et al.  The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: A test of three-way interaction , 1994 .

[64]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology on JIT Shipments , 1994 .

[65]  Gerald A. Feltham,et al.  Cost Determination: A Conceptual Approach , 1976 .

[66]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.