WIC Participation and Relative Quality of Household Food Purchases: Evidence from Foodaps

We examine the effect of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on the quality of household food purchases using the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS) and propensity score matching. A healthy purchasing index (HPI) is used to measure nutritional quality of household food purchases. WIC foods explain the improvement in quality of food purchases, not self‐selection of more nutrition‐conscious households into the program. The improvement in purchase quality was driven entirely by WIC participating households who redeemed WIC foods during the interview week. There was no significant difference between WIC participants who did not redeem WIC foods and eligible nonparticipants. In this sample, there is no evidence that lack of access to clinics has adverse effects on participation nor is there evidence that HPI depends on supermarket access. A supervised machine learning process supports our main conclusion on the importance of WIC foods.

[1]  Susan Athey,et al.  The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics , 2018, The Economics of Artificial Intelligence.

[2]  H. Jensen,et al.  Did Revisions to the WIC Program Affect Household Expenditures on Whole Grains , 2016 .

[3]  Lyudmyla Sonchak The Impact of WIC on Birth Outcomes: New Evidence from South Carolina , 2016, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[4]  Stefan Wager,et al.  Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests , 2015, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[5]  Susan Athey,et al.  Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Lisa Mancino,et al.  Where Do Americans Usually Shop for Food and How Do They Travel To Get There? Initial Findings from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey , 2015 .

[7]  Janet Currie,et al.  Within-Mother Estimates of the Effects of WIC on Birth Outcomes in New York City , 2014, Economic inquiry.

[8]  T. Andreyeva,et al.  Incentivizing fruit and vegetable purchases among participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children , 2014, Public Health Nutrition.

[9]  Matías Busso,et al.  New Evidence on the Finite Sample Properties of Propensity Score Reweighting and Matching Estimators , 2014, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[10]  Maya Rossin-Slater WIC in Your Neighborhood: New Evidence on the Impacts of Geographic Access to Clinics. , 2013, Journal of public economics.

[11]  S. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2010. , 2013, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[12]  Rachel Hayes Polon,et al.  Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010 , 2013 .

[13]  KyungMann Kim,et al.  Contrasting treatment‐specific survival using double‐robust estimators , 2012 .

[14]  H. Eyles,et al.  Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: a systematic review , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[15]  E. Frazão,et al.  The WIC Program: Background, Trends, and Economic Issues, 2015 Edition , 2012 .

[16]  L. Tiehen,et al.  WIC Participation Patterns: An Investigation of Delayed Entry and Early Exit , 2012 .

[17]  Li Feng,et al.  Effects of Federal Nutrition Program on Birth Outcomes , 2012 .

[18]  Marianne E. Page,et al.  Can targeted transfers improve birth outcomes?: Evidence from the introduction of the WIC program , 2011 .

[19]  Simon Jackman,et al.  Nineteen Ways of Looking at Statistical Software , 2011 .

[20]  B. Devaney WIC Turns 35 Program Effectiveness and Future Directions , 2010 .

[21]  C. A. Swann,et al.  WIC Eligibility and Participation: The Roles of Changing Policies, Economic Conditions, and Demographics , 2010 .

[22]  A. Drichoutis,et al.  Can Nutritional Label Use Influence Body Weight Outcomes? , 2009 .

[23]  Y. Ye,et al.  Using propensity scores to adjust for selection bias when assessing the effectiveness of Alcoholics Anonymous in observational studies. , 2009, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[24]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Does prenatal WIC participation improve birth outcomes? New evidence from Florida , 2009, Journal of Public Economics.

[25]  Megan E. Patrick,et al.  Teenage alcohol use and educational attainment. , 2008, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[26]  L. Tiehen,et al.  Why Wait?: Examining Delayed WIC Participation Among Pregnant Women , 2008 .

[27]  Adam E. Wyse,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Small School Size on Mathematics Achievement: A Propensity Score-Matching Approach , 2008, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[28]  Jasjeet S. Sekhon,et al.  Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization: The Matching Package for R , 2008 .

[29]  Guanglei Hong,et al.  Effects of kindergarten retention on children's social-emotional development: an application of propensity score method to multivariate, multilevel data. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[30]  M. Bitler,et al.  Does WIC work? The effects of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes. , 2005, Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management].

[31]  M. Bitler,et al.  The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York City: what does it mean? , 2005, Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management].

[32]  Marco Caliendo,et al.  Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[33]  T. DiPrete,et al.  7. Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects: Rosenbaum Bounds on Matching Estimators and Instrumental Variables Estimation with Imperfect Instruments , 2004 .

[34]  Randy Capps Assessing Implementation of the 2002 Farm Bill's Legal Immigrant Food Stamp Restorations: Final Report to the United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service , 2004 .

[35]  T. Joyce,et al.  The Changing Association between Prenatal Participation in WIC and Birth Outcomes in New York City , 2004, Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management].

[36]  M. Bitler,et al.  Medicaid at Birth, WIC Take Up, and Children's Outcomes , 2004 .

[37]  B. Popkin,et al.  The effect of participation in the WIC program on preschoolers' diets. , 2004, The Journal of pediatrics.

[38]  T. Shakespeare,et al.  Observational Studies , 2003 .

[39]  A. Siega-Riz,et al.  Sociodemographic determinants of added sugar intake in preschoolers 2 to 5 years old. , 2002, The Journal of pediatrics.

[40]  P. McNamara,et al.  The Effect of Income and Food Programs on Dietary Quality: A Seemingly Unrelated Regression Analysis with Error Components , 1999 .

[41]  G. Owen,et al.  Twenty years of WIC: a review of some effects of the program. , 1997, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[42]  J. Burghardt,et al.  The School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study. Summary of Findings. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service , 1993 .

[43]  D B Rubin,et al.  Practical implications of modes of statistical inference for causal effects and the critical role of the assignment mechanism. , 1991, Biometrics.

[44]  D. Rubin,et al.  Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 1985 .

[45]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[46]  E. Frazão,et al.  Where Do WIC Participants Redeem Their Food Benefits? An Analysis of WIC Food Dollar Redemption Patterns by Store Type , 2016 .

[47]  Maya Rossin-Slater,et al.  Early-life origins of life-cycle well-being: research and policy implications. , 2015, Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management].

[48]  Luke Keele,et al.  An overview of rbounds: An R package for Rosenbaum bounds sensitivity analysis with matched data. , 2010 .

[49]  B. Lin,et al.  EFFECTS OF FOOD ASSISTANCE AND NUTRITION PROGRAMS ON NUTRITION AND HEALTH: VOLUME 3, LITERATURE REVIEW , 2004 .

[50]  M. Bitler,et al.  WIC Eligibility and Participation , 2003 .