In situ force mapping of mammary gland transformation.

Tumor progression is characterized by an incremental stiffening of the tissue. The importance of tissue rigidity to cancer is appreciated, yet the contribution of specific tissue elements to tumor stiffening and their physiological significance remains unclear. We performed high-resolution atomic force microscopy indentation in live and snap-frozen fluorescently labeled mammary tissues to explore the origin of the tissue stiffening associated with mammary tumor development in PyMT mice. The tumor epithelium, the tumor-associated vasculature and the extracellular matrix all contributed to mammary gland stiffening as it transitioned from normal to invasive carcinoma. Consistent with the concept that extracellular matrix stiffness modifies cell tension, we found that isolated transformed mammary epithelial cells were intrinsically stiffer than their normal counterparts but that the malignant epithelium in situ was far stiffer than isolated breast tumor cells. Moreover, using an in situ vitrification approach, we determined that the extracellular matrix adjacent to the epithelium progressively stiffened as tissue evolved from normal through benign to an invasive state. Importantly, we also noted that there was significant mechanical heterogeneity within the transformed tissue both in the epithelium and the tumor-associated neovasculature. The vascular bed within the tumor core was substantially stiffer than the large patent vessels at the invasive front that are surrounded by the stiffest extracellular matrix. These findings clarify the contribution of individual mammary gland tissue elements to the altered biomechanical landscape of cancerous tissues and emphasize the importance of studying cancer cell evolution under conditions that preserve native interactions.

[1]  Hertz On the Contact of Elastic Solids , 1882 .

[2]  L. Liotta,et al.  Metastatic potential correlates with enzymatic degradation of basement membrane collagen , 1980, Nature.

[3]  C B Frank,et al.  The effect of cryopreservation on the biomechanical behavior of bovine articular cartilage , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  R. Cardiff,et al.  Induction of mammary tumors by expression of polyomavirus middle T oncogene: a transgenic mouse model for metastatic disease , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  C F Abrams,et al.  Effects of freezing on mechanical properties of rat skin. , 1992, American journal of veterinary research.

[6]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips , 1993 .

[7]  R. Friedman,et al.  Effects of multiple freezing-thawing cycles on ultimate indentation load and stiffness of bovine cancellous bone. , 1997, American journal of veterinary research.

[8]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[10]  R K Jain,et al.  Mechanics of interstitial-lymphatic fluid transport: theoretical foundation and experimental validation. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R. Jain,et al.  Oncotic pressure in solid tumors is elevated. , 2000, Cancer research.

[12]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases , 2000, Nature.

[13]  S. Kuwada,et al.  Integrin α5/β1 Mediates Fibronectin-dependent Epithelial Cell Proliferation through Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation , 2000 .

[14]  S. Kuwada,et al.  Integrin alpha5/beta1 mediates fibronectin-dependent epithelial cell proliferation through epidermal growth factor receptor activation. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[15]  R. Cardiff,et al.  Mammary Disease Mice Model Premalignant Polyoma Middle-T Transgenic Updated Version , 2001 .

[16]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention , 2001, Current oncology reports.

[17]  D. Hammer,et al.  Cell separation mediated by differential rolling adhesion. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  A. Nagy,et al.  Embryonic stem cells and mice expressing different GFP variants for multiple non-invasive reporter usage within a single animal , 2002, BMC biotechnology.

[19]  Kornelia Polyak,et al.  Breast cancer gene discovery , 2002, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.

[20]  Zena Werb,et al.  Stromal Effects on Mammary Gland Development and Breast Cancer , 2002, Science.

[21]  I. Macdonald,et al.  Metastasis: Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  J. Zavadil,et al.  Single cell behavior in metastatic primary mammary tumors correlated with gene expression patterns revealed by molecular profiling. , 2002, Cancer research.

[23]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Cancer as a disease of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and extracellular matrix regulation. , 2002, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[24]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  Abbas Samani,et al.  Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Kevin D. Costa,et al.  Single-Cell Elastography: Probing for Disease with the Atomic Force Microscope , 2004, Disease markers.

[27]  Jeffrey W Pollard,et al.  Progression to malignancy in the polyoma middle T oncoprotein mouse breast cancer model provides a reliable model for human diseases. , 2003, The American journal of pathology.

[28]  Ingo R. Titze,et al.  Effect of Postmortem Changes and Freezing on the Viscoelastic Properties of Vocal Fold Tissues , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Pathology: Cancer cells compress intratumour vessels , 2004, Nature.

[30]  K J Gooch,et al.  The relative magnitudes of endothelial force generation and matrix stiffness modulate capillary morphogenesis in vitro. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[31]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[32]  L. Junqueira,et al.  The influence of tissue section thickness on the study of collagen by the Picrosirius-polarization method , 2004, Histochemistry.

[33]  Gavin Thurston,et al.  Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in cancer causes loss of endothelial fenestrations, regression of tumor vessels, and appearance of basement membrane ghosts. , 2004, The American journal of pathology.

[34]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[35]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[36]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[37]  Ralph Sinkus,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Breast: Correlation of Signal Intensity Data With Viscoelastic Properties , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[38]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[39]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[40]  John S. Condeelis,et al.  ROCK- and Myosin-Dependent Matrix Deformation Enables Protease-Independent Tumor-Cell Invasion In Vivo , 2006, Current Biology.

[41]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk : A Meta-analysis Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Updated , 2006 .

[42]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[43]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. , 2007, Soft matter.

[44]  L. Esserman,et al.  A role for biomarkers in the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer in younger women , 2007, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[45]  E Amler,et al.  Biochemical and biophysical aspects of collagen nanostructure in the extracellular matrix. , 2007, Physiological research.

[46]  J. Climent,et al.  Characterization of breast cancer by array comparative genomic hybridization. , 2007, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[47]  Paula D. Bos,et al.  Mediators of vascular remodelling co-opted for sequential steps in lung metastasis , 2007, Nature.

[48]  Dai Fukumura,et al.  Tumor microenvironment abnormalities: Causes, consequences, and strategies to normalize , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[49]  J. Rao,et al.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[50]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Microtissue elasticity: measurements by atomic force microscopy and its influence on cell differentiation. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[51]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[52]  G. Isenberg,et al.  Bending of z-lines by mechanical stimuli: an input signal for integrin dependent modulation of ion channels? , 2008, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[53]  Teodor Gotszalk,et al.  Calibration of atomic force microscope , 2008 .

[54]  C. Lim,et al.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[55]  B. Garmy-Susini,et al.  Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[56]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: The force journey of a tumor cell , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[57]  Cees W J Oomens,et al.  Linear viscoelastic behavior of subcutaneous adipose tissue. , 2008, Biorheology.

[58]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Can cancer be reversed by engineering the tumor microenvironment? , 2008, Seminars in cancer biology.

[59]  C. Rueden,et al.  Bmc Medicine Collagen Density Promotes Mammary Tumor Initiation and Progression , 2022 .

[60]  Mikala Egeblad,et al.  Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.

[61]  M. Insana,et al.  Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[62]  M. Olson,et al.  Tissue selective expression of conditionally‐regulated ROCK by gene targeting to a defined locus , 2009, Genesis.

[63]  Valerie M. Weaver,et al.  A tense situation: forcing tumour progression , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[64]  Robert S. Adelstein,et al.  Local Cortical Tension by Myosin II Guides 3D Endothelial Cell Branching , 2009, Current Biology.

[65]  ZHAO GANG,et al.  AND METHODS Experimental Design All animal care and experimentation conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals from the National Academy of Sciences , 2009 .

[66]  P. Janmey,et al.  The mechanical cell , 2009, Current Biology.

[67]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  The effects of substrate elasticity on endothelial cell network formation and traction force generation , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[68]  Daniel A. Hammer,et al.  Integrin Clustering Is Driven by Mechanical Resistance from the Glycocalyx and the Substrate , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[69]  Alissa M. Weaver,et al.  Regulation of cancer invasiveness by the physical extracellular matrix environment , 2009, Cell adhesion & migration.

[70]  C. Murphy,et al.  Determining the mechanical properties of human corneal basement membranes with atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[71]  P. Thurner Atomic force microscopy and indentation force measurement of bone. , 2009, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[72]  Paula D. Bos,et al.  Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[73]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[74]  A. Díez-Pérez,et al.  The tissue diagnostic instrument. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[75]  P. A. Dimilla,et al.  Vascular smooth muscle cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[76]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Non-Linear Elasticity of Extracellular Matrices Enables Contractile Cells to Communicate Local Position and Orientation , 2009, PloS one.

[77]  Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: A comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[78]  W. You,et al.  Pericyte deficiencies lead to aberrant tumor vascularizaton in the brain of the NG2 null mouse. , 2010, Developmental biology.

[79]  Z. Werb,et al.  Matrix Metalloproteinases: Regulators of the Tumor Microenvironment , 2010, Cell.

[80]  Dai Fukumura,et al.  Tumor Microvasculature and Microenvironment: Novel Insights Through Intravital Imaging in Pre‐Clinical Models , 2010, Microcirculation.

[81]  Dihua Yu,et al.  Cancer cell stiffness: integrated roles of three-dimensional matrix stiffness and transforming potential. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[82]  Sebastian Wojcinski,et al.  Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[83]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Harnessing Traction-Mediated Manipulation of the Cell-Matrix Interface to Control Stem Cell Fate , 2010, Nature materials.

[84]  Xavier Estivill,et al.  Gene expression signatures in breast cancer distinguish phenotype characteristics, histologic subtypes, and tumor invasiveness , 2010, Cancer.

[85]  I. Kasman,et al.  Ricinus communis agglutinin I leads to rapid down-regulation of VEGFR-2 and endothelial cell apoptosis in tumor blood vessels. , 2010, The American journal of pathology.

[86]  K. Mokbel Management of Ductal Carcinoma In situ , 2013 .