Do Negative Messages Work?

We examine the effectiveness of negative campaigning. Specifically, we focus on the question, Do negative campaign messages alter citizens’ evaluations of competing candidates? We rely on a research design that replicates the campaign environment for nearly 100 Senate elections involving thousands of voters. Furthermore, we utilize a theoretical framework that sheds light on how negative information influences people’s social judgments. In general, the results suggest that negative messages delivered in a legitimate fashion and focusing on a relevant topic depress evaluations of opponents. In contrast, negative messages containing irrelevant information delivered in an overly strident manner depress evaluations of both candidates involved in the campaign. In addition, the findings indicate that the impact of negative messages varies depending on (a) the status of the candidate delivering the message, (b) the characteristics of the citizens receiving the message, and (c) the style of the candidates’criticisms (e.g., policy vs. personal attacks).

[1]  R. Lau,et al.  Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections , 2002 .

[2]  M. Zanna,et al.  Impact of Negative Advertising on Evaluations of Political Candidates: The 1993 Canadian Federal Election , 1997 .

[3]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[4]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[5]  J. Bargh Automatic and conscious processing of social information. , 1984 .

[6]  P. Kenney,et al.  Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[7]  D. Rucinski The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[8]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1992 .

[9]  Gary A. Copeland,et al.  Southern Voters' Reaction to Negative Political Ads in 1986 Election , 1989 .

[10]  Craig Leonard Brians,et al.  Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer? , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[11]  B. Pinkleton The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations: An Exploration , 1997 .

[12]  K. Goldstein,et al.  Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads , 1999 .

[13]  Kathleen E. Kendall Presidential campaign discourse : strategic communication problems , 1995 .

[14]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[15]  Kim Fridkin Kahn,et al.  Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. , 1992 .

[16]  Samuel Kernell,et al.  Presidential Popularity and Negative Voting: An Alternative Explanation of the Midterm Congressional Decline of the President's Party , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[17]  K. Goldstein,et al.  New Evidence for New Arguments: Money and Advertising in the 1996 Senate Elections , 2000, The Journal of Politics.

[18]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[19]  B. Reeves,et al.  Emotion and Memory Responses for Negative Political Advertising: A Study of Television Commercials Used in the 1988 Presidential Election. , 1989 .

[20]  Lynda Lee Kaid,et al.  Effects of the Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton , 1997 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[22]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Unraveling the complexities of social life : a festschrift in honor of Robert B. Zajonc , 2001 .

[23]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  James B. Lemert News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns: , 1991 .

[25]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior , 1985 .

[26]  T. Sulkin Explaining Campaign Intensity , 2001 .

[27]  L. L. Kaid,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Negative Political Advertisements. , 1987 .

[28]  R. Stein Economic Voting for Governor and U. S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism , 1990, The Journal of Politics.

[29]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology , 1991 .

[30]  J. Forgas Feeling and thinking : the role of affect in social cognition , 2000 .

[31]  C. Franklin Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[32]  Patrick J. Kenney,et al.  The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns , 1999 .

[33]  J. Ferejohn,et al.  Presidential Coattails in Historical Perspective , 1984 .

[34]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate , 1995 .

[35]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. , 1980 .

[37]  Philip E. Converse,et al.  A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[38]  Craig Leonard Brians,et al.  Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News and Newspapers , 1996 .

[39]  Kim Fridkin Kahn The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns , 1996 .

[40]  Michael D. Martinez,et al.  The irrelevance of negative campaigns to political trust: Experimental and survey results , 1990 .

[41]  J. Geer,et al.  Creating impressions: An experimental investigation of political advertising on television , 1994 .

[42]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Dean E. Alger The Media and Politics , 1989 .

[44]  G. Kwarciany Buying time , 2002, Nursing.

[45]  Gina M. Garramone,et al.  Appeals and strategies of negative political advertising , 1988 .

[46]  P. Squire Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in U. S. Senate Elections , 1992 .

[47]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The psychology of the mere. , 2001 .

[48]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  Negativity in political perception , 1982 .

[49]  P. Squire Challengers in U. S. Senate Elections , 1989 .

[50]  D. Apter,et al.  Ideology and discontent , 1966 .

[51]  James E. Campbell,et al.  Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[52]  P. Converse The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[53]  Eric R. A. N. Smith,et al.  A Further Examination of Challenger Quality in Senate Elections , 1996 .

[54]  Kathleen Hall Jamieson,et al.  Everything You Think You Know About Politics...and Why You're Wrong , 2000 .

[55]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  Political judgment : structure and process , 1995 .

[56]  Todd Donovan Campaign Warriors: Political Consultants in Elections - Book Review , 2001 .

[57]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  On the correction of feeling-induced judgmental biases. , 2000 .

[59]  M. Zanna,et al.  Context effects in impression formation: Changes in connotative meaning. , 1974 .

[60]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Comparing Positive and Negative Political Advertising on Radio , 1992 .

[61]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Politics of Congressional Elections , 1983 .

[62]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[63]  A. Chadha Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections , 1997 .