Satellites and Suburbs: A High-Resolution Model of Open-Space Conversion

This study examines the determinants of urbanized area across a 10,000-mile square swath in central North Carolina, an area undergoing extensive conversion of forest and agricultural land.We model the temporal and spatial dimensions of these landscape changes using a database that links five satellite images spanning 1976?2001 to a suite of socioeconomic, ecological and GIScreated explanatory variables. By specifying the complementary log-log derivation of the proportional hazards model, we employ a methodology for modeling a continuous time process – the conversion of land to impervious surface – using discrete-time satellite data. Spatial effects are captured by several variables derived from the imagery that measure the landscape configuration surrounding a pixel. Empirical results confirm the significance of several determinants of urbanization identified elsewhere in the literature, including proximity to roads and population density, but also suggest that the parameterization of these variables is biased when the influence of landscape configuration is unaccounted for. We conclude that the inclusion of spatial pattern metrics significantly improves both the explanatory and predictive power of the estimated model of urbanization.

[1]  Colin Vance,et al.  Analyzing spatial hierarchies in remotely sensed data: Insights from a multilevel model of tropical deforestation , 2006 .

[2]  Shoufan Fang,et al.  The impact of interactions in spatial simulation of the dynamics of urban sprawl , 2005 .

[3]  Mark E. Lichtenstein,et al.  Urbanization on the US landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century , 2004 .

[4]  Kathleen P. Bell,et al.  Modeling and Managing Urban Growth at the Rural-Urban Fringe: A Parcel-Level Model of Residential Land Use Change , 2003, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[5]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Zoning, Development Timing, and Agricultural Land Use at the Suburban Fringe: A Competing Risks Approach , 2003, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[6]  Gregory D. Squires,et al.  Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, & Policy Responses , 2002 .

[7]  B. Meredith Burke,et al.  Book Review: Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ Across the U.S. William Fulton, Rolf Pendall, Mai Nguyen, and Alicia Harrison. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, July 2001 (www.brook.edu/urban/fulton%2d pendall.htm) , 2002 .

[8]  Harry H. Kelejian,et al.  On the asymptotic distribution of the Moran I test statistic with applications , 2001 .

[9]  E. Irwin,et al.  The Problem of Identifying Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values , 2001 .

[10]  J. Kline,et al.  Integrating Urbanization into Landscape-level Ecological Assessments , 2001, Ecosystems.

[11]  Mark M. Fleming,et al.  Growth Controls and Fragmented Suburban Development: The Effect on Land Values , 1999, Ann. GIS.

[12]  N. Bockstael,et al.  Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS , 1997 .

[13]  A. Pfaff.  What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from satellite and socioeconomic data , 1997 .

[14]  Gerald Nelson,et al.  Do Roads Cause Deforestation? Using Satellite Images in Econometric Analysis of Land Use , 1997 .

[15]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Land Ownership and Land‐Cover Change in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula , 1996 .

[16]  K. Chomitz,et al.  Roads, Lands, Markets, and Deforestation: A Spatial Model of Land Use in Belize , 1995 .

[17]  D. MacCleery,et al.  Forest resources of the United States, 1992. Forest Service general technical report (Final) , 1993 .

[18]  Robert W. Helsley,et al.  The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth , 1989 .

[19]  William Alonso,et al.  Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent , 1966 .

[20]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of Association for Cross Classifications III: Approximate Sampling Theory , 1963 .

[21]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of Association for Cross Classifications. II: Further Discussion and References , 1959 .

[22]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  Corrigenda: Measures of Association for Cross Classifications , 1957 .

[23]  S. Srinivasan.  Linking land use and transportation in a rapidly urbanizing context: A study in Delhi, India , 2005 .

[24]  E. Irwin,et al.  Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns , 2002 .

[25]  R. Ewing,et al.  MEASURING SPRAWL AND ITS IMPACT , 2002 .

[26]  Jeffrey P. Prestemon,et al.  Timber Products Supply and Demand , 2002 .

[27]  Paul A. Jargowsky,et al.  Sprawl, Concentration of Poverty, and Urban Inequality * , 2001 .

[28]  P. Allison.  Survival analysis using the SAS system : a practical guide , 1995 .

[29]  James Howard Kunstler,et al.  The geography of nowhere : the rise and decline of America's man - made landscape , 1993 .

[30]  Ralph J. Alig,et al.  Urban and built-up land area changes in the United States: an empirical investigation of determinants. , 1987 .

[31]  R. Sheffield,et al.  North Carolina's forests , 1979 .

[32]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .