Spectral density affects the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech: Implications for cochlear implant simulations.

For small numbers of channels, tone vocoders using low envelope cutoff frequencies are less intelligible than noise vocoders, even though the noise carriers introduce random fluctuations into the crucial envelope information. Here it is shown that using tone carriers with a denser spectrum improves performance considerably over typical tone vocoders, at least equaling, and often surpassing, the performance possible with noise vocoders. In short, the spectral sparseness of tone vocoded sounds for low channel numbers, separate from the degradations introduced by using only a small number of channels, is an important limitation on the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech.

[1]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Brian Roberts,et al.  The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Constructing adequate non-speech analogues: what is special about speech anyway? , 2007, Developmental science.

[4]  S. Sheft,et al.  The Influence of Environmental Sound Training on the Perception of Spectrally Degraded Speech and Environmental Sounds , 2012, Trends in amplification.

[5]  M. Dorman,et al.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P C Loizou,et al.  On the number of channels needed to understand speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[9]  Peter F Assmann,et al.  Identification of frequency-shifted vowels. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J Bamford,et al.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[11]  Julio González,et al.  Gender and speaker identification as a function of the number of channels in spectrally reduced speech. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Evidence for Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Plasticity in Speech Perception. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: Implications for auditory prostheses , 2008, Hearing Research.

[16]  S. Rosen Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  Alan Kan,et al.  Speech Perception in Noise with a Harmonic Complex Excited Vocoder , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.