Magnetic resonance flow measurements in real time: Comparison with a standard gradient‐echo technique

Ultrafast gradient systems and hybrid imaging sequences offer the opportunity to acquire phase contrast flow data in real time. In a 1.5‐Tesla magnetic resonance (MR)‐tomograph, peak velocity and volume flow were assessed in 36 large vessels (aorta) and 33 medium‐sized vessels (carotid and iliac artery) using a real‐time (segmented k‐space turbo gradient‐echo planar imaging sequence) in comparison with a gradient‐echo technique. With the real‐time technique, the matrix was reduced from 116 to 64, and temporal resolution changed from 30 msec to 124 msec. Measurements of peak velocity correlated in large (r = 0.88) and medium‐sized vessels (r = 0.81). Volume flow measurements correlated in large vessels (r = 0.87), however, a poor correlation (r = 0.64) was found in medium‐sized vessels. Thus, scan time can be significantly reduced and images acquired without electrocardiogram (ECG)‐triggering. Flow volume can only be determined in large vessels with sufficient accuracy, mainly due to reduced spatial resolution in smaller vessels.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;14:306–310. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  P Boesiger,et al.  Visualization and quantification of the human blood flow by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  J. Pauly,et al.  Nonsubtractive spiral phase contrast velocity imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Theoretical aspects of motion sensitivity and compensation in echo‐planar imaging , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  N J Pelc,et al.  Arterial and venous blood flow: noninvasive quantitation with MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[5]  D. Parker,et al.  The Voxel Sensitivity Function in Fourier Transform Imaging: Applications to Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Nico Westerhof,et al.  In Vivo Validation of Magnetic Resonance Blood Volume Flow Measurements with Limited Spatial Resolution in Small Vessels , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  D L Parker,et al.  The effect of image resolution on vessel signal in high‐resolution magnetic resonance angiography , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  D N Firmin,et al.  Real time blood flow imaging by spiral scan phase velocity mapping , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  R L Ehman,et al.  Analysis of systematic and random error in MR volumetric flow measurements , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  G C McKinnon,et al.  Interleaved echo planar phase contrast angiography , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  D N Firmin,et al.  The application of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurement , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  J F Debatin,et al.  Interleaved echo planar flow quantitation , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Debatin,et al.  MR characterization of blood flow in native and grafted internal mammary arteries , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  M. Morton,et al.  Volumetric flow rates in the portal venous system: measurement with cine phase-contrast MR imaging. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  M. Boska ATP production rates as a function of force level in the human gastrocnemius/soleus using 31P MRS , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  E Fleck,et al.  Magnetic resonance real-time imaging for the evaluation of left ventricular function. , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  N J Pelc,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Blood Flow with a Phase Subtraction Technique: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[19]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Plow quantitation with echo‐planar phase‐contrast velocity mapping: In vitro and in vivo evaluation , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Kim Butts,et al.  Analysis of flow effects in echo‐planar imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  C. Higgins,et al.  Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo validation. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  P. Gibbs,et al.  Real‐time flow measurements using echo‐planar imaging , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  D N Firmin,et al.  Vena caval flow: assessment with cine MR velocity mapping. , 1990, Radiology.

[24]  J M Pauly,et al.  New real-time interactive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging system complements echocardiography. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  D. Firmin,et al.  Echo‐planar high‐resolution flow velocity mapping , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  R. Herfkens,et al.  Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[27]  G. Mckinnon Ultrafast interleaved gradient‐echo‐planar imaging on a standard scanner , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  D. Parker,et al.  Accuracy of phase‐contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial‐volume effects , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  N J Pelc,et al.  Renal artery blood flow: quantitation with phase-contrast MR imaging with and without breath holding. , 1994, Radiology.

[30]  D Meier,et al.  Quantitative flow measurements on phantoms and on blood vessels with MR , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  P. Bendel,et al.  Blood flow in the carotid arteries: quantification by using phase-sensitive MR imaging. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.